Risk of Closure
Great S&M romance in DA:I - but next time, can WE be the dominant one?
#77
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 05:44
I think you have to not recruit Dorian to get that scene.
LOL, why would anyone not recruit Dorian? He's the heart of the party ![]()
- Hazegurl, Lord Bolton et CDR Aedan Cousland aiment ceci
#78
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 05:46
Lol @ "modern free love and sex" killing our society.
'Cause nobody ever had kinky sex before Y2K.
Nobody ever had kinky sex openly before the 1960s, when the Communist-sponsored Hippie Movement advocated free love and free sex at the expense of healthy relationships and marriages. Before that it was a hush-hush thing, which is how it should be. Now such deviancy and degradation are open, advocated, and even paraded.
#79
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 05:46
LOL, why would anyone not recruit Dorian? He's the heart of the party
Oh no, I love Dorian!
I'm just pretty sure that's the prerequisite to getting the Cullen/Leliana chess scene. According to YouTube, anyway.
- Octarin aime ceci
#80
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 05:46
Lol @ "modern free love and sex" killing our society.
'Cause nobody ever had kinky sex before Y2K.
Oh, yeah, and nevermind the seventies, pfft.
- vertigomez aime ceci
#81
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 05:47
@mods: Feel free to delete my post containing Jack's quote, too.
#82
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 05:48
Nobody ever had kinky sex openly before the 1960s, when the Communist-sponsored Hippie Movement advocated free love and free sex at the expense of healthy relationships and marriages. Before that it was a hush-hush thing, which is how it should be. Now such deviancy and degradation are open, advocated, and even paraded.
You're cute.
- WildOrchid, Grieving Natashina, Malthier et 1 autre aiment ceci
#83
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 05:49
You're cute.
The sad part is that I think he actually believes himself
- Grieving Natashina et Malthier aiment ceci
#84
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 05:51
Nobody ever had kinky sex openly before the 1960s, when the Communist-sponsored Hippie Movement advocated free love and free sex at the expense of healthy relationships and marriages. Before that it was a hush-hush thing, which is how it should be. Now such deviancy and degradation are open, advocated, and even paraded.

#85
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 05:52
The sad part is that I think he actually believes himself
Hey, it's hard being that attention-starved! Guy's gotta get recognition somehow.
- WildOrchid et Malthier aiment ceci
#86
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 05:53
The sad part is that I think he actually believes himself
The sad part is it's all verifiable, backed, and even confirmed in declassified KGB documents. Many of the "founders" of the hippie movement in the 60s-70s were men with Communist leanings and sketchy backgrounds. It was a highly subversive movement with subversive goals, and much of the drugs they used, be it LSD or anything else, had been manufactured by the Government in thought-control processes, then were dispensed carefully throughout the country as an experiment. The free love movement was designed to assist in populatory control and the degradation of families, marriage, and stable relationships to throw off the U.S. breeding practices, which vice-versa was the intent of CIA drug experiments targeting the Soviet population. Your idea of free love, liberalism, and even kinky sex, it's all Cold War politics and espionage that were fought in an invisible war you, your parents, and your grandparents never knew about.
If you don't believe me, then go look up MK Ultra, which even ****ing Wikipedia has an article about.
Sure, some elements of the 60s movements were fine, like the anti-war ideas; rock music and acidic rock? Hell yes. Those I can support. But the free love, free sex, and free drugs? That's when you start annihilating the fabric of Western society.
The S&M ideology as it is now surfaced in the 1700s under wealthy noblemen who would hire mistresses to service them. These nobles had pain fetishes many times, so this entire practice became known as "BDSM". It was a very low-profile, low-brow sexual lifestyle that was rightly criminalized for many years, and by the early 1900s it had lost most of its steam and nearly faded as just a bad memory of antiquity. Until the 1960s, when Hippies and ProgLibs brought back old-style sex practices under the guise of it being 'free love', forgetting that things like S&M destroyed families, relationships, and lives in the nobility and elsewhere.
#87
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 05:55
I hope BioWare doesn't cave into any of your creepy demands.
#89
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 05:57
The sad part is it's all verifiable, backed, and even confirmed in declassified KGB documents. Many of the "founders" of the hippie movement in the 60s-70s were men with Communist leanings and sketchy backgrounds. It was a highly subversive movement with subversive goals, and much of the drugs they used, be it LSD or anything else, had been manufactured by the Government in thought-control processes, then were dispensed carefully throughout the country as an experiment. The free love movement was designed to assist in populatory control and the degradation of families, marriage, and stable relationships to throw off the U.S. breeding practices, which vice-versa was the intent of CIA drug experiments targeting the Soviet population. Your idea of free love, liberalism, and even kinky sex, it's all Cold War politics and espionage that were fought in an invisible war you, your parents, and your grandparents never knew about.
If you don't believe me, then go look up MK Ultra, which even ****ing Wikipedia has an article about.
Sure, some elements of the 60s movements were fine, like the anti-war ideas; rock music and acidic rock? Hell yes. Those I can support. But the free love, free sex, and free drugs? That's when you start annihilating the fabric of Western society.

- Handsome Jack aime ceci
#90
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 05:59
HELP ME JESUS
(Communists!!1 Hipp I es'qjlB$! PEOPLE ENJOYING THE SEX OH NOES)
/goodbye friends I have not had nearly enough caffeine for this road trip
The S&M ideology as it is now surfaced in the 1700s under wealthy noblemen who would hire mistresses to service them. These nobles had pain fetishes many times, so this entire practice became known as "BDSM". It was a very low-profile, low-brow sexual lifestyle that was rightly criminalized for many years, and by the early 1900s it had lost most of its steam and nearly faded as just a bad memory of antiquity. Until the 1960s, when Hippies and ProgLibs brought back old-style sex practices under the guise of it being 'free love', forgetting that things like S&M destroyed families, relationships, and lives in the nobility and elsewhere.
That was an addition to my main post. If you think "Enjoying Sex" is reason enough to do it, then you should advocate for the legalization of things like making love to your horse or your car, amongst other things. After all, it's enjoyable sex, right? OMG DONT TAKE MY FREE SEX AWAY!!!
S&M caused great distraught amongst married families, which was mostly the fault of those partaking, yes, but it was rightly criminalized to help them, along with adultery. Both these things are now legal, unfortunately.
It was never a harmless sex practice, and never has been.
WHICH, BACK ON TOPIC SO WE STOP DERAILING THIS THREAD THEN BLAME IT ON HANDSOME JACK
Is why it doesn't belong in Dragon Age. It makes no sense in Dragon Age's society, and S&M character like Bull are walking parodies, hollow husks of what writing once was.
#91
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 06:00
Nobody ever had kinky sex openly before the 1960s, when the Communist-sponsored Hippie Movement advocated free love and free sex at the expense of healthy relationships and marriages. Before that it was a hush-hush thing, which is how it should be. Now such deviancy and degradation are open, advocated, and even paraded.
Oh bebe, this is glorious.
Hyperion sponsored morality lessons!
- vertigomez et WildOrchid aiment ceci
#92
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 06:04
Derailing ends here.
As I asked originally; why does S&M need to be added? What would it give value to? Why would it be necessary?
- WikipediaBrown et CDR Aedan Cousland aiment ceci
#93
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 06:09
Nobody ever had kinky sex openly before the 1960s, when the Communist-sponsored Hippie Movement advocated free love and free sex at the expense of healthy relationships and marriages. Before that it was a hush-hush thing, which is how it should be. Now such deviancy and degradation are open, advocated, and even paraded.
Considering that there are various depictions of what we might call "kinky" sex on various ancient sites, and they are mentioned in several ancient texts, your point falls rather flat.
- vertigomez aime ceci
#94
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 06:12
Considering that there are various depictions of what we might call "kinky" sex on various ancient sites, and they are mentioned in several ancient texts, your point falls rather flat.
I was speaking of Western society.
And mind you, ancient societies based on deviancy and pleasure collapsed like a pile of bricks, burning in the fire of their own hubris. Rome, Greece, Persia, India/Mughals, China's dynasties, the Mongols; they crashed and they burned.
#95
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 06:13
Considering that there are various depictions of what we might call "kinky" sex on various ancient sites, and they are mentioned in several ancient texts, your point falls rather flat.
And you SERIOUSLY take him seriously? Are you serious?
Overburn overhere. Going overthere for tonight....

#96
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 06:13
And you SERIOUSLY take him seriously? Are you serious?
Overburn overhere. Going overthere for tonight....
Instead of repeating against it, let me ask a clear and concise question.
Why shouldn't I be taken seriously?
#97
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 06:15
Instead of repeating against it, let me ask a clear and concise question.
Why shouldn't I be taken seriously?
Because of what you post....
- Octarin aime ceci
#98
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 06:17
Because of what you post....
And why does that mean I shouldn't be taken seriously?
Answers people. Let's get to the root of this.
#99
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 06:20
I was speaking of Western society.
And mind you, ancient societies based on deviancy and pleasure collapsed like a pile of bricks, burning in the fire of their own hubris. Rome, Greece, Persia, India/Mughals, China's dynasties, the Mongols; they crashed and they burned.
Such behavior can be traced to the 14th century as well.
As far as civilizations crashing and burning, they all do, sooner or later. It has nothing to do with perceived "deviancy" or what not.
- WildOrchid aime ceci
#100
Posté 11 mai 2015 - 06:20
And why does that mean I shouldn't be taken seriously?
Answers people. Let's get to the root of this.
Some things are overly self-evident, my dear. Cheerio.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




