Aller au contenu

Photo

Feedback... be more like The Witcher 3


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
15897 réponses à ce sujet

#5251
KBomb

KBomb
  • Members
  • 3 927 messages

I have not tried that outcome myself, but I strongly suspect

Spoiler

 I never went that route either, but I forgot about that little set up. I do believe you may be right.

 

 

I meant the man. The horse I don't care about.

:o You don't care about Roach? Shame upon you!

 

Actually, I have had several of my friends curse that horse to death and back for being completely "stupid". I am quite fond of her. Even more so when she comes about photobombing conversations or if I forget to use Axii and she deposits me smack in the middle of a pack of ghouls.

 

She gives me the lol's.  :wub:  (I can't believe he is a she. I just assumed with a name like "Roach" it was male, but then I do remember Geralt saying all his horses were "Roach". That's what one gets for assuming.)



#5252
London

London
  • Members
  • 971 messages
I just left White Orchard so my impressions of Witcher 3 are still a but premature - but some quick thoughts.

1. A ton of auto-dialogue. People slammed ME3 for this but Geralt goes on and on after choosing a 3 word choice. Some might say it's because he is a pre-designed character, but then to be fair we could say Shepard has some level of character pre-designed as well. When people complain about the dialogue wheel for being misleading - well Geralt has surprises in store for you. Some options where I thought I was being nice, Geralt is flat out rude.

2. Geralt is bland, but I appreciate his dry humor. Made me chuckle a few times. Will be curious how this pans out. DAI made me laugh quite a few times.

3. Controls are awkward. Especially on the horse. I had to reload on a horse race since it galloped to the wrong side of a fence and couldn't get back over. Combat Geralt flies all over. I just spam left mouse button and sometimes dodge or use a sign. It doesn't really matter who Geralt hits, you only need to do very basic aiming. DAIs feels more tactical while playing. That said I like the bestiary entries in Witcher 3 that provide good strategies on weaknesses.

4. Witcher 3s world is more interesting, but I'm not on the floor drooling over it. Townspeople actually have stationary activities / animations which is superior to DAIs NPcs doing nothing. They also change locations at night. The ones that move around are generic with no real dialogue. They are nobody's that just walk around. The NPCs also tell the same stories every time I pass them. For example, I've heard the kid get scolded by his father and told not to play with his friend like 39 times. So While DAIs world is like a picture frozen in time, Witcher 3s is like Groundhog Day. Everything is interesting, but only the first time through. Then the world breaks immersion because it's not realistic that people would have the same exact conversation 10 times or more. Still, Witcher 3 does a better job of environmental storytelling than DAI.

5. I like that Witcher 3 has unintentional consequences that punish you for trying to be helpful. Right now it's hard to tell how something will turn out which keeps me on my toes and makes me think more about my choices. DAI did not have any choices whose results shocked me. It had a Couple that made me think but your choices in DAI always go as you planned on them. I think I like Witcher 3s approach as Geralt is just one man and he can't control most of what goes on around him.

6. Yennefers exciting moment on the way out of White Orchard was nothing compared to how awesome Leliana was in the Mage path storyline. Maybe she will have actual badass moments later.

7. Voice acting is better in DAI but Witcher 3s is better than past Witcher games.

Anyway will see if these impressions change as I go on.
  • Heimdall, Akrabra, SwobyJ et 1 autre aiment ceci

#5253
ashwind

ashwind
  • Members
  • 3 150 messages

I just left White Orchard so my impressions of Witcher 3 are still a but premature - but some quick thoughts.

1. A ton of auto-dialogue. People slammed ME3 for this but Geralt goes on and on after choosing a 3 word choice. Some might say it's because he is a pre-designed character, but then to be fair we could say Shepard has some level of character pre-designed as well. When people complain about the dialogue wheel for being misleading - well Geralt has surprises in store for you. Some options where I thought I was being nice, Geralt is flat out rude.

2. Geralt is bland, but I appreciate his dry humor. Made me chuckle a few times. Will be curious how this pans out. DAI made me laugh quite a few times.

3. Controls are awkward. Especially on the horse. I had to reload on a horse race since it galloped to the wrong side of a fence and couldn't get back over. Combat Geralt flies all over. I just spam left mouse button and sometimes dodge or use a sign. It doesn't really matter who Geralt hits, you only need to do very basic aiming. DAIs feels more tactical while playing. That said I like the bestiary entries in Witcher 3 that provide good strategies on weaknesses.

4. Witcher 3s world is more interesting, but I'm not on the floor drooling over it. Townspeople actually have stationary activities / animations which is superior to DAIs NPcs doing nothing. They also change locations at night. The ones that move around are generic with no real dialogue. They are nobody's that just walk around. The NPCs also tell the same stories every time I pass them. For example, I've heard the kid get scolded by his father and told not to play with his friend like 39 times. So While DAIs world is like a picture frozen in time, Witcher 3s is like Groundhog Day. Everything is interesting, but only the first time through. Then the world breaks immersion because it's not realistic that people would have the same exact conversation 10 times or more. Still, Witcher 3 does a better job of environmental storytelling than DAI.

5. I like that Witcher 3 has unintentional consequences that punish you for trying to be helpful. Right now it's hard to tell how something will turn out which keeps me on my toes and makes me think more about my choices. DAI did not have any choices whose results shocked me. It had a Couple that made me think but your choices in DAI always go as you planned on them. I think I like Witcher 3s approach as Geralt is just one man and he can't control most of what goes on around him.

6. Yennefers exciting moment on the way out of White Orchard was nothing compared to how awesome Leliana was in the Mage path storyline. Maybe she will have actual badass moments later.

7. Voice acting is better in DAI but Witcher 3s is better than past Witcher games.

Anyway will see if these impressions change as I go on.

 

Witchers are stripped of emotions when they are made into witchers. Which is why Geralt is "bland". :P



#5254
TheOgre

TheOgre
  • Members
  • 2 260 messages
Spoiler


I could be off on that one but midnight had posted something similar to that being the case in the books before.

Just to be clear.. I like Geralts minimalistic to the point Dialogue.

#5255
Eonetic

Eonetic
  • Members
  • 112 messages

Geralt's backstory is contained in 7 novels (8 with SoS) and so without having read them you miss out on quite a bit.

 

Personally as someone who has read the books, it's nice that the game does not force me to sit through hours of tedious retelling of things that i already know.

 

The way they did it by integrating the backstory from the books into codexs,descriptions and dialogue is the best i think they could have done.

Sometimes it's a bit vague but it gives important backstory on the previous events for those who are interested in it and does not shove down the throat of people who arent or already know it.


  • KBomb aime ceci

#5256
KBomb

KBomb
  • Members
  • 3 927 messages

I just left White Orchard so my impressions of Witcher 3 are still a but premature - but some quick thoughts.

1. A ton of auto-dialogue. People slammed ME3 for this but Geralt goes on and on after choosing a 3 word choice. Some might say it's because he is a pre-designed character, but then to be fair we could say Shepard has some level of character pre-designed as well. When people complain about the dialogue wheel for being misleading - well Geralt has surprises in store for you. Some options where I thought I was being nice, Geralt is flat out rude.

2. Geralt is bland, but I appreciate his dry humor. Made me chuckle a few times. Will be curious how this pans out. DAI made me laugh quite a few times.

3. Controls are awkward. Especially on the horse. I had to reload on a horse race since it galloped to the wrong side of a fence and couldn't get back over. Combat Geralt flies all over. I just spam left mouse button and sometimes dodge or use a sign. It doesn't really matter who Geralt hits, you only need to do very basic aiming. DAIs feels more tactical while playing. That said I like the bestiary entries in Witcher 3 that provide good strategies on weaknesses.

4. Witcher 3s world is more interesting, but I'm not on the floor drooling over it. Townspeople actually have stationary activities / animations which is superior to DAIs NPcs doing nothing. They also change locations at night. The ones that move around are generic with no real dialogue. They are nobody's that just walk around. The NPCs also tell the same stories every time I pass them. For example, I've heard the kid get scolded by his father and told not to play with his friend like 39 times. So While DAIs world is like a picture frozen in time, Witcher 3s is like Groundhog Day. Everything is interesting, but only the first time through. Then the world breaks immersion because it's not realistic that people would have the same exact conversation 10 times or more. Still, Witcher 3 does a better job of environmental storytelling than DAI.

5. I like that Witcher 3 has unintentional consequences that punish you for trying to be helpful. Right now it's hard to tell how something will turn out which keeps me on my toes and makes me think more about my choices. DAI did not have any choices whose results shocked me. It had a Couple that made me think but your choices in DAI always go as you planned on them. I think I like Witcher 3s approach as Geralt is just one man and he can't control most of what goes on around him.

6. Yennefers exciting moment on the way out of White Orchard was nothing compared to how awesome Leliana was in the Mage path storyline. Maybe she will have actual badass moments later.

7. Voice acting is better in DAI but Witcher 3s is better than past Witcher games.

Anyway will see if these impressions change as I go on.

Very nice impression! Thumbs up.

 

1. Can you give an example of what you chose for Geralt to say when he replied with a rude dialog? I thought the replies were spot on with the choices. I also didn't mind the auto-dialog, ,maybe it's because I expected it. 

 

2. A lot of people agree with you on this point. I really find Geralt to be an amazing character, but he seems to be a character that YMMV gives meaning to. There are tons of hilarious moments with him in the game. He really has a lot of humorous situations and conversations. 

 

3. I don't think either game is as tactical as they could be. In both games you can get through many fights just spamming the attack button, however, with both games you can be very tactical if you choose to be. With TW3, it's more about planning your tactics before the fight, utilizing your bestiary, mixing and applying oils and using decoctions, brewing and setting which potions would benefit you more and of course, using the appropriate sign coinciding with the creature's weakness. DAI relies more on in-fight tactics and it's different in the aspect you have a team to manage. I love the combat in TW3, but I also love the combat in DAI. A lot of people dislike both.

 

4. I think both games are pretty even on ambient banter. Well, actually, I think TW3 may be slightly better. In DAI when you go to the refugee camp in the Hinterlands, everyone says the same thing over and over and over again and also at the ramparts in Exalted Plains. In TW3, there are a few villages where it's static conversations too, but just like DAI's Redcliffe, there are some banter/conversations that are different. I actually think TW3 is a bit better in the long run, though. When I visited one village in TW3, this little kid was singing a song about Emrhys, but later when I returned (after doing the town's contracts and a couple of side missions) the kid was actually singing a song about Geralt. The townspeople also react to you personally over certain things. I tried jumping over a kid and he yelled at me for it. Once, I bumped into a little girl and she told me to stop stepping on her. I have also had people comment on missions I completed, how ugly my character was and use different greetings depending on how much I have helped the village I am in.

 

5. There are many upcoming choices that make you think and sometimes you don't have very much time to think about them. There is one where someone wanted me to do something completely horrible in order to help someone, I did it and immediately felt terrible about my decision, turns out it was the right one to make. So you might make a decision in a mission thinking it's the more honorable or most kind choice, only to find out later that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

 

6. The scene with meeting Yennifer is nothing compared to upcoming scenes with her. Imo, I thought there were a lot of badass moments not only for Yen, but for a lot of TW3's women. The mages are pretty kickass in this game and there are plenty of moments where you can see why mages are thought to be as powerful as they really are. There is a moment with Triss where you really see what she is capable of and let's you know that conjuring butterflies is a small spell compared to what she can dish out when she wants to. 

 

7. I think DAI has better voice acting, too. I was really impressed with TW3's actors though. Especially the Baron and the crew at Kaer Morhen. Even Geralt was much better this go round. I think since a lot of people complained of his monotone voice in TW1-2, CDPR wanted to make him more "human". They couldn't go too overboard with it though or it wouldn't have felt like Geralt. I think they found a nice balance with him and in some of the scenes, you really do get a chance to see him more as human and less as a cold witcher.

 

Anyway, hope you enjoy the game more as you get into it. Have fun and let us know what you think!


  • London et TheOgre aiment ceci

#5257
Ashelsu

Ashelsu
  • Members
  • 910 messages

 I never went that route either, but I forgot about that little set up. I do believe you may be right.

 

 

:o You don't care about Roach? Shame upon you!

 

Actually, I have had several of my friends curse that horse to death and back for being completely "stupid". I am quite fond of her. Even more so when she comes about photobombing conversations or if I forget to use Axii and she deposits me smack in the middle of a pack of ghouls.

 

She gives me the lol's.  :wub:  (I can't believe he is a she. I just assumed with a name like "Roach" it was male, but then I do remember Geralt saying all his horses were "Roach". That's what one gets for assuming.)

Geralt's horses are always mares and he names them all "Płotka". Roach (fish) is a direct translation, but not sure if a good one (an unpleasant insect or Vernon Roche sound too familiar and it's probably confusing for english speakers :D).

I know you can get another horse from the Emperor, but it just not right to ditch your loyal friend. Probably on the "Evil Geralt" play.


  • KBomb, SnakeCode et Lord Bolton aiment ceci

#5258
Dreadstruck

Dreadstruck
  • Members
  • 2 326 messages

It doesn't really matter though, Geralt names all his horses "Roach". :D

 

Also, semi-related to the discussion:

 

yoUr3GI.jpg

 

Now we know to which dimension she despawns when geralt doesn't need her. :P



#5259
Heathen Oxman

Heathen Oxman
  • Members
  • 414 messages

One thing I'm pretty impressed with CDPR is, in an era where women in videogames are criticized for running into battle wearing nothing but skimpy outfits, TW3 gives us men who run into battle wearing nothing but boxer shorts.

 

Well-played, CDPR! :D


  • quinwhisperer et Lord Bolton aiment ceci

#5260
Rawgrim

Rawgrim
  • Members
  • 11 534 messages

Geralt isn't a character we get to create ourselves, so auto-dialog in this case is not a biggie. In games that claims that the player gets to create his own character, it is kind of a biggie, since auto-dialog strips the player of control over his own character.


  • KBomb, AmberDragon et TheOgre aiment ceci

#5261
London

London
  • Members
  • 971 messages

Very nice impression! Thumbs up.

1. Can you give an example of what you chose for Geralt to say when he replied with a rude dialog? I thought the replies were spot on with the choices. I also didn't mind the auto-dialog, ,maybe it's because I expected it.

2. A lot of people agree with you on this point. I really find Geralt to be an amazing character, but he seems to be a character that YMMV gives meaning to. There are tons of hilarious moments with him in the game. He really has a lot of humorous situations and conversations.

3. I don't think either game is as tactical as they could be. In both games you can get through many fights just spamming the attack button, however, with both games you can be very tactical if you choose to be. With TW3, it's more about planning your tactics before the fight, utilizing your bestiary, mixing and applying oils and using decoctions, brewing and setting which potions would benefit you more and of course, using the appropriate sign coinciding with the creature's weakness. DAI relies more on in-fight tactics and it's different in the aspect you have a team to manage. I love the combat in TW3, but I also love the combat in DAI. A lot of people dislike both.

4. I think both games are pretty even on ambient banter. Well, actually, I think TW3 may be slightly better. In DAI when you go to the refugee camp in the Hinterlands, everyone says the same thing over and over and over again and also at the ramparts in Exalted Plains. In TW3, there are a few villages where it's static conversations too, but just like DAI's Redcliffe, there are some banter/conversations that are different. I actually think TW3 is a bit better in the long run, though. When I visited one village in TW3, this little kid was singing a song about Emrhys, but later when I returned (after doing the town's contracts and a couple of side missions) the kid was actually singing a song about Geralt. The townspeople also react to you personally over certain things. I tried jumping over a kid and he yelled at me for it. Once, I bumped into a little girl and she told me to stop stepping on her. I have also had people comment on missions I completed, how ugly my character was and use different greetings depending on how much I have helped the village I am in.

5. There are many upcoming choices that make you think and sometimes you don't have very much time to think about them. There is one where someone wanted me to do something completely horrible in order to help someone, I did it and immediately felt terrible about my decision, turns out it was the right one to make. So you might make a decision in a mission thinking it's the more honorable or most kind choice, only to find out later that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

6. The scene with meeting Yennifer is nothing compared to upcoming scenes with her. Imo, I thought there were a lot of badass moments not only for Yen, but for a lot of TW3's women. The mages are pretty kickass in this game and there are plenty of moments where you can see why mages are thought to be as powerful as they really are. There is a moment with Triss where you really see what she is capable of and let's you know that conjuring butterflies is a small spell compared to what she can dish out when she wants to.

7. I think DAI has better voice acting, too. I was really impressed with TW3's actors though. Especially the Baron and the crew at Kaer Morhen. Even Geralt was much better this go round. I think since a lot of people complained of his monotone voice in TW1-2, CDPR wanted to make him more "human". They couldn't go too overboard with it though or it wouldn't have felt like Geralt. I think they found a nice balance with him and in some of the scenes, you really do get a chance to see him more as human and less as a cold witcher.

Anyway, hope you enjoy the game more as you get into it. Have fun and let us know what you think!

Thanks for your reply. I really am enjoying Witcher 3 - but I am trying to be fair. Also sorry for any typos, my iPad sometimes changes my words into whatever it wants and I don't always catch them all :)

1. One example was meeting the Emporor. I am trying to play a shrewed Geralt, not letting people know too much what he is doing or how he feels. So when I met the Emporer I bowed. Then Geralt proceeded to say something rude and the Emporer called me insolent - a situation I intended to avoid. I really don't mind this at all though - I only mentioned it because people hold BioWare up to far higher standards on their dialogue wheel than they do for The Witcher. I dont think you create your own character in BioWare games. You can change superficial qualities like gender, voice, and hair, and you make decisions about what the character decides to do, but all are choices that fit the character. You are still playing Shepard, or The Inquisitor, or Hawke - not "Create Your Own Hero". There is just more variety in what the role looks like.

2. I like Geralt. I've been seeing him as a grouch that despite his mutations and training not to care, still cares. And I think even the intro area had lots of quests where you could have played him as someone who doesn't get involved in others affairs at all. I haven't had any BioWare character play like Geralt, so he is a refreshing character for me. I guess you could play an ambivalent Inquisitor - but it's still not the same.

3. I agree here. This system I liked since Witcher 2 (I skipped the first one - I'm too late to this franchise and I think games just evolved too much since then for me to want to spend free time on it now - especially because I have too many games I have yet to play at all since I enjoy my RPGs too much.). I think researching monsters, balanced by the fact that as a Witcher Geralt already knows a thing or two about most monsters, is really interesting. Also it encourages you to use more skills in Geralts toolbox. But, when all else fails - left click left click left click. Dodge. This is what happened for me during the griffon. I was given a crossbow right before but didn't know how to even use it. DAIs autoattack and numbered hot keys you stare at are just easier for me to remember than Witchers commands all over the keyboard - though I'm starting to get the hang of them so this will be a temporary complaint.

4. This morning I entered Velen and an NPC couple were arguing and then went inside and shut the door. I went in and they told me to get out - which is realistic. This didn't repeat. So I think Witcher does have far more interesting things happening in the environment than DAI. I think DAIs NPCs were so dull in the open world that I forgot they had dialogue at all. But now that you mention it - it is even worse than Witcher. At least Witchers NPCs have interesting stories to overhear that throw you into the setting. DAIs generic "have you heard" with no follow up, or complaining the soldiers do in Exalted Plains, just makes me cringe. And running into your forces in the world is just dumb - like when they are standing in the middle of nowhere guarding a chest with a generic, nothing special dagger or something. Just Why?

5. Looking forward to this - will add some challenge to decisions which for me haven't been easy to begin with at times.

6. I love badass women. So much the pretty terrible Resident Evil movie franchise is something I rewatch at least once a year in a marathon sitting. Or the Underworlds with Kate Beckinsale. Can't wait to see more of this from Witchers women. I know Triss impressed me a few times in Witcher 2 so can't wait to see her again. Already very torn over which of the ladies I should romance.

7. Agree here!

#5262
duckley

duckley
  • Members
  • 1 865 messages

I love Geralt's personality and how he has grown through the three games -so dry and sardonic. I love his facial expressions - you can just feel his eyes rolls in half the whacky situations he finds himself in or whacky people he has to deal with ...  LOL.

 

One advantage IMO of having a game wit  the same protagonist - is that you can see how they grow, change and hopefully mature through the series. I love seeing Shepard or Nate for example, as they get older and hopefully wiser. Looking forward to Uncharted 4 for that reason.


  • Xetykins, SnakeCode, Lord Bolton et 2 autres aiment ceci

#5263
panzerwzh

panzerwzh
  • Members
  • 1 226 messages

 

Pretty much sums up the difference between TW3 and DAI.

There are tons of basic things (e.g. decent plot/dialogue writing, character interation and expression, play chioce development etc.) Bioware needs to learn from CDPR.


  • duckley, Lord Bolton et AmberDragon aiment ceci

#5264
GithCheater

GithCheater
  • Members
  • 815 messages

One thing I'm pretty impressed with CDPR is, in an era where women in videogames are criticized for running into battle wearing nothing but skimpy outfits, TW3 gives us men who run into battle wearing nothing but boxer shorts.

 

Well-played, CDPR! :D

 

On the other, Geralt never removes his boxer shorts so as not offend homophobes.


  • SwobyJ aime ceci

#5265
TheOgre

TheOgre
  • Members
  • 2 260 messages

 

Pretty much sums up the difference between TW3 and DAI.

There are tons of basic things (e.g. decent plot/dialogue writing, character interation and expression, play chioce development etc.) Bioware needs to learn from CDPR.

 

Good points in the video, especially around 10:52-11:45


  • panzerwzh et Lord Bolton aiment ceci

#5266
DiamondBarJohn

DiamondBarJohn
  • Members
  • 52 messages

Witchers are stripped of emotions when they are made into witchers. Which is why Geralt is "bland". :P

 

Which makes his dialogue in the play really hilarious.


  • duckley aime ceci

#5267
panzerwzh

panzerwzh
  • Members
  • 1 226 messages

And another nice trick from TW3, improve the emotion expression and detail of in game model, hence all "cutscences" could be rendered with in game engine.

 

http://i.imgur.com/pGUSbAU.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/fNhYjmc.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/cCMBAEU.png



#5268
Dread-Reaper

Dread-Reaper
  • Members
  • 444 messages

Witchers are stripped of emotions when they are made into witchers. Which is why Geralt is "bland". :P

This is false. They are encouraged during their training to not show emotions, as to keep cool-headed, logistical and reinforce their neutrality stance. 


  • TheOgre aime ceci

#5269
Lord Bolton

Lord Bolton
  • Members
  • 598 messages

 

Pretty much sums up the difference between TW3 and DAI.

There are tons of basic things (e.g. decent plot/dialogue writing, character interation and expression, play chioce development etc.) Bioware needs to learn from CDPR.

This is wonderful! Thank you for sharing this.

Also, Youtube comments for this video are quite interesting.


  • panzerwzh aime ceci

#5270
panzerwzh

panzerwzh
  • Members
  • 1 226 messages

The path of witcher is about neutrality. As Geralt told Ciri in books 'Do you understand what this neutrality is, which stirs you so? To be neutral does not mean to be indifferent or insensitive. You don’t have to kill your feelings. It’s enough to kill hatred within yourself.'

 

Geralt is super protective and crazy for the ones he loved (i.e. Ciri & Yenna). So are Ciri and Yenna.

 

https://41.media.tum...af21o4_1280.jpg



#5271
panzerwzh

panzerwzh
  • Members
  • 1 226 messages

This is wonderful! Thank you for sharing this.

Also, Youtube comments for this video are quite interesting.

With pleasure! :)



#5272
KBomb

KBomb
  • Members
  • 3 927 messages

Thanks for your reply. I really am enjoying Witcher 3 - but I am trying to be fair. Also sorry for any typos, my iPad sometimes changes my words into whatever it wants and I don't always catch them all :)

1. One example was meeting the Emporor. I am trying to play a shrewed Geralt, not letting people know too much what he is doing or how he feels. So when I met the Emporer I bowed. Then Geralt proceeded to say something rude and the Emporer called me insolent - a situation I intended to avoid. I really don't mind this at all though - I only mentioned it because people hold BioWare up to far higher standards on their dialogue wheel than they do for The Witcher. I dont think you create your own character in BioWare games. You can change superficial qualities like gender, voice, and hair, and you make decisions about what the character decides to do, but all are choices that fit the character. You are still playing Shepard, or The Inquisitor, or Hawke - not "Create Your Own Hero". There is just more variety in what the role looks like.

2. I like Geralt. I've been seeing him as a grouch that despite his mutations and training not to care, still cares. And I think even the intro area had lots of quests where you could have played him as someone who doesn't get involved in others affairs at all. I haven't had any BioWare character play like Geralt, so he is a refreshing character for me. I guess you could play an ambivalent Inquisitor - but it's still not the same.

3. I agree here. This system I liked since Witcher 2 (I skipped the first one - I'm too late to this franchise and I think games just evolved too much since then for me to want to spend free time on it now - especially because I have too many games I have yet to play at all since I enjoy my RPGs too much.). I think researching monsters, balanced by the fact that as a Witcher Geralt already knows a thing or two about most monsters, is really interesting. Also it encourages you to use more skills in Geralts toolbox. But, when all else fails - left click left click left click. Dodge. This is what happened for me during the griffon. I was given a crossbow right before but didn't know how to even use it. DAIs autoattack and numbered hot keys you stare at are just easier for me to remember than Witchers commands all over the keyboard - though I'm starting to get the hang of them so this will be a temporary complaint.

4. This morning I entered Velen and an NPC couple were arguing and then went inside and shut the door. I went in and they told me to get out - which is realistic. This didn't repeat. So I think Witcher does have far more interesting things happening in the environment than DAI. I think DAIs NPCs were so dull in the open world that I forgot they had dialogue at all. But now that you mention it - it is even worse than Witcher. At least Witchers NPCs have interesting stories to overhear that throw you into the setting. DAIs generic "have you heard" with no follow up, or complaining the soldiers do in Exalted Plains, just makes me cringe. And running into your forces in the world is just dumb - like when they are standing in the middle of nowhere guarding a chest with a generic, nothing special dagger or something. Just Why?

5. Looking forward to this - will add some challenge to decisions which for me haven't been easy to begin with at times.

6. I love badass women. So much the pretty terrible Resident Evil movie franchise is something I rewatch at least once a year in a marathon sitting. Or the Underworlds with Kate Beckinsale. Can't wait to see more of this from Witchers women. I know Triss impressed me a few times in Witcher 2 so can't wait to see her again. Already very torn over which of the ladies I should romance.

7. Agree here!


Oh, don't worry about typos. Everytime I use my phone to reply, I find typos.

I am so glad you're enjoying it more. There is one mission concerning a Baron, it's one of my favorite missions ever-- I'd love to hear your impression of it, as I think it really defines the difference in how quests are handled.

I do think TW3 is the better gaming experience. It's as close to perfection as one can get, in my opinion, but even so, I think it could stand a few improvements. I think DAI is a good game too and I enjoyed playing it, but between bugs and some design choices, it left me feeling a bit disappointed. Hopefully, they'll take some notes and improve some things come time for DA4. Anyway, enjoy your game!
  • SnakeCode, AmberDragon et TheOgre aiment ceci

#5273
Akrabra

Akrabra
  • Members
  • 2 364 messages

This is wonderful! Thank you for sharing this.

Also, Youtube comments for this video are quite interesting.

Good video, but one of the comments was abit insulting and elitist. "This is the bed that Bioware made, now they can sleep in it. I hope that they are happy with their NEW fanbase. As I've posted their before, the new fanbase is bunch of people that don't know old Bioware."

 

Knowing the old Bioware is not a requirement to enjoy their new games and the same for old fans that actually do enjoy their new games. Also to point out that CDRP has made 3 games, 2 of which i consider amazing, one that is amazing-ish. While Bioware has made about 13 - 15 hugely successfull RPG's, some which had great extensions in form of expansions and dlc. And most of these games i consider to be work of art. At some point you are gonna hit that bump in the road.

 

Sometimes i feel like we fans think we know the studio better than the people that actually run it. I think Ray and Greg left it in a poor state with selling the company to EA. I am not hating on Ray and Greg, they have both done amazing things for western RPG's. The sale however was handled rather poorly and had clear results in quality of the coming games under EA. Both the vision and themes were off and at the reduced development time did not help. I don't mind publishers buying developers aslong as they give them the required time to finish their vision for a product. EA has gotten better. Now with both DA:i and now ME:A having sufficient development time to get back to form. DA:I is not up there with the classics, but it was a huge step in the right direction in many ways, and i think the next game will be even better. If we can get the same with ME:A we will see that it is working and that EA finally understands what Bioware needs. 

 

Also remember that some day when CDRP has made like 10 games with the quality of the Witcher series, they will hit a snag, because every developer does and alot of fans will be judging and questioning the direction of the studio. It will be very interesting to see how they will handle that situation, when the time comes.

 

Sorry for the rant, just came to me. 


  • GithCheater, duckley et blahblahblah aiment ceci

#5274
Rawgrim

Rawgrim
  • Members
  • 11 534 messages

13-15 hugely successful rpgs is pushing it. BG1 and 2 were huge successes, ME 1-3, I guess. Dragon Age 1-3, Kotor 1. That is 9 games, if we use some good-will. I am not sure DA2 was that big a success, though.



#5275
Akrabra

Akrabra
  • Members
  • 2 364 messages

13-15 hugely successful rpgs is pushing it. BG1 and 2 were huge successes, ME 1-3, I guess. Dragon Age 1-3, Kotor 1. That is 9 games, if we use some good-will. I am not sure DA2 was that big a success, though.

It depends if we are going by sale or reception. I would say Jade Empire and Neverwinter Nights make the list aswell.