Aller au contenu

Photo

Feedback... be more like The Witcher 3


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
15883 réponses à ce sujet

#5651
KBomb

KBomb
  • Members
  • 3 927 messages

Re-occupation occurs in the Hinterlands, as well as almost every Keep claimed for the Inquisition.

You mean the refugee camp where you get Mother Giselle? Those people were already there before your Inquisitor showed up. You see that when Harding sends up the raven for the first time. There wasn't any re-occupation. What buildings were recreated or newly built that refugees occupy? That's what I am really confused on.

Also, besides the merchant, the keeps occupy agents and support staff for the Inquisition and I don't see that having any visible impact on the world around the keeps. You capture and claim them for the Inquisition. You don't liberate them as havens for refugees. The only thing I recall changing is seeing a few Inquisition soldiers in the area and a couple offering useless loot more often than not, but those things happen if you establish campsites, too. Do the outskirting villages even remark on the keeps after you capture them? I don't recall any banter that said otherwise, though it's easy for me to miss banter if I am not close enough to trigger subtitles.
  • panzerwzh, Uccio, Xetykins et 2 autres aiment ceci

#5652
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 928 messages

Even CDPR can't escape the internet's obsession with video game romances.

I don't think it's an obsession but more like the game is defaulted to one choice in this department, Yennefer.  If you pick Triss, the game still assumes you picked Yennefer while Triss is on a boat saying "Well?"  It's not a bug but more like a few inconsistencies with the story telling that were pointed out in the Triss thread. 

 

Overall, I was really happy to read their reply and I'm glad that it's not a knee jerk reaction but something they are actually researching for themselves with the suggestions in mind.  Either way, they are doing what is right for themselves and the customer which takes time, rather than slapping anything together in the most extreme ways in hopes of pleasing the audience.  *cough* Bioware *cough*


  • panzerwzh, Xetykins, chrstnmonks et 1 autre aiment ceci

#5653
line_genrou

line_genrou
  • Members
  • 992 messages

Even CDPR can't escape the internet's obsession with video game romances.

 


 

Funny you say that when W3 has a quest exactly about the romance between Yennefer and Geralt.

Their story is very important in the Witcher universe. The reaction is only natural.

 

For me it's pretty obvious Yennefer is the endgame. It was stated more than once that she is the love of Geralt's life, in those exact words, actually.

Triss took advantage of Geralt's amnesia to get it on with him, and of course never mentioned Yen to him.


  • panzerwzh et SnakeCode aiment ceci

#5654
line_genrou

line_genrou
  • Members
  • 992 messages

Let's marvel at this for a moment

 


  • panzerwzh, MeanderingMind et Hazegurl aiment ceci

#5655
Elhanan

Elhanan
  • Members
  • 18 593 messages

You mean the refugee camp where you get Mother Giselle? Those people were already there before your Inquisitor showed up. You see that when Harding sends up the raven for the first time. There wasn't any re-occupation. What buildings were recreated or newly built that refugees occupy? That's what I am really confused on.

Also, besides the merchant, the keeps occupy agents and support staff for the Inquisition and I don't see that having any visible impact on the world around the keeps. You capture and claim them for the Inquisition. You don't liberate them as havens for refugees. The only thing I recall changing is seeing a few Inquisition soldiers in the area and a couple offering useless loot more often than not, but those things happen if you establish campsites, too. Do the outskirting villages even remark on the keeps after you capture them? I don't recall any banter that said otherwise, though it's easy for me to miss banter if I am not close enough to trigger subtitles.


Guard towers, I believe; not village. As for Keeps, they become occupied with support staff including merchants, scouts, etc.

#5656
KBomb

KBomb
  • Members
  • 3 927 messages

Guard towers, I believe; not village. As for Keeps, they become occupied with support staff including merchants, scouts, etc.


I wouldn't call the guard towers newly erected buildings in which people move in and occupy. There are a couple of soldiers guarding them and that's about it. You can't even enter the ones in the Hinterlands and the ones you claim in Emprise du Lion aren't much better.

As for the latter half about the keeps-- that's exactly what I said previously. lol

Also, keep in mind that these things have little to do with the discussion we were having about the intriguing differences in landscapes. This seems to be another "Well, DAI has those things too! Well, sort of! Kind of if you look between the lines! In a way..." It kind of reeks of desperation to protect the view you have of DAI when there is no need to. Both games have really great moments, environments, characters, etc. One having more of something doesn't make the one that has less a bad game, not sure why you must feel the need to constantly defend it using examples that really only highlight the fact that in some things, DAI just doesn't hold up in comparison.

I hope they are taking notes and that there won't be a need for this discussion when DA4 debuts.
  • KilrB, Xetykins, SnakeCode et 1 autre aiment ceci

#5657
MoonDrummer

MoonDrummer
  • Members
  • 1 897 messages

Let's marvel at this for a moment

 

English language

American flag

 

giphy.gif


  • panzerwzh, TakezoDunmer2005 et SnakeCode aiment ceci

#5658
Xetykins

Xetykins
  • Members
  • 2 009 messages

You mean the refugee camp where you get Mother Giselle? Those people were already there before your Inquisitor showed up. You see that when Harding sends up the raven for the first time. There wasn't any re-occupation. What buildings were recreated or newly built that refugees occupy? That's what I am really confused on.
Also, besides the merchant, the keeps occupy agents and support staff for the Inquisition and I don't see that having any visible impact on the world around the keeps. You capture and claim them for the Inquisition. You don't liberate them as havens for refugees. The only thing I recall changing is seeing a few Inquisition soldiers in the area and a couple offering useless loot more often than not, but those things happen if you establish campsites, too. Do the outskirting villages even remark on the keeps after you capture them? I don't recall any banter that said otherwise, though it's easy for me to miss banter if I am not close enough to trigger subtitles.


I had to search youtube on these "new buildings" where the refugees moves in as well, as I might have missed it ( was sure i didn't). Nothing, and yes only merchant and troops moves in the not new keeps. Not sure what he's trying to prove here by saying things that aren't true.

On that note. I broke and bought the damned game. I'm a weak willed woman. Though, I won't play it til I'm back from holiday on Tuesday. I really hope the male protag will not bother me to the point that I have to stop playing. It's not about the money, it's the thought of not being able to experience this, because I'm just being excessively weird.
  • Dreadstruck, panzerwzh, HowlingSiren et 3 autres aiment ceci

#5659
Dreadstruck

Dreadstruck
  • Members
  • 2 326 messages

Isn't Emma Hiddleston from London? Thought an UK flag would make more sense, because it's sung by her but eh, whatever. :P



#5660
Elhanan

Elhanan
  • Members
  • 18 593 messages

I wouldn't call the guard towers newly erected buildings in which people move in and occupy. There are a couple of soldiers guarding them and that's about it. You can't even enter the ones in the Hinterlands and the ones you claim in Emprise du Lion aren't much better.

As for the latter half about the keeps-- that's exactly what I said previously. lol

Also, keep in mind that these things have little to do with the discussion we were having about the intriguing differences in landscapes. This seems to be another "Well, DAI has those things too! Well, sort of! Kind of if you look between the lines! In a way..." It kind of reeks of desperation to protect the view you have of DAI when there is no need to. Both games have really great moments, environments, characters, etc. One having more of something doesn't make the one that has less a bad game, not sure why you must feel the need to constantly defend it using examples that really only highlight the fact that in some things, DAI just doesn't hold up in comparison.

I hope they are taking notes and that there won't be a need for this discussion when DA4 debuts.


Seem to recall a displaced family speaking of being warm in the towers, and thankful for the food and blankets. And the Keeps are examples are legitimate occupations by non-soldiers, which is the point of showing an evolving environment.

#5661
TakezoDunmer2005

TakezoDunmer2005
  • Members
  • 40 messages

Quests and decisions that have consequences, a properly filled open world, much less pointless harvesting and looting, and much better gameplay. Also CD Projekt Red is giving out Free DLC specifically to divert from the greedy norm, putting Inquisition to shame.

 

Please don't take people's individual preferences personally here. There are a lot of things the majority of us can agree on!  :)

 

Also, fair warning, there are spoilers in this thread for the Dragon Age and Witcher franchises so read with caution. If you're contributing to the thread, please use "Spoiler" tags for discussing story elements.

 

Since I refuse to read through 200+ pages I'll simply stick to the OP...

 

First off, get rid of Origin...It's a punch in the tangerines to every person who purchases games from this diabolical company... (EA, not Bioware...As they're not even a company anymore) It's the sole reason I won't purchase this game.. (Seriously, needing steam and origin to function!?) q-(>_<)-p

 

Secondly, more choice for the people who are supporting this game (All the lovely GeNerds here)  by not bilking them out of their hard earned student loan money while nickle-diming them with pointless DLC...

 

Lastly, give the developers more creative freedom by sending EA's Upper management and the entire marketing staff to the middle east to fight IS/ISL/ISIS, armed with their calculators and PDAs...Worst come to worse the devs can fall back using kickstarter if the suits are unsuccessful in their mission, as it's a much more noble quest than game development indeed...



#5662
KBomb

KBomb
  • Members
  • 3 927 messages

Seem to recall a displaced family speaking of being warm in the towers, and thankful for the food and blankets. And the Keeps are examples are legitimate occupations by non-soldiers, which is the point of showing an evolving environment.

That family obviously didn't get any ram meat and are delusional from hunger. No family lives in any of the watchtowers, nor are any present nearby or on the site of the towers. The keeps are not examples of civilian occupation because those are employees of the Inquisition and but for the fact that the Inquisition claimed it as a spoil of war, those people would not be there. For instance, Skyhold employs maids and cooks. These are not soldiers, but you can't categorize them as refugees or civilians occupying a new stead. They are occupying Skyhold because they are part of the Inquisition. You must build watchtowers in order to gain access to mounts and you must claim keeps to further the story. (except for the one in Emprise du Lion, but at the moment, I can't remember if you're required to do that for story progression or to gain an agent only)

 

I am putting this next bit in a spoiler. It is long and that way no one has to read it if they do not wish to.

 

Spoiler

 

 

I had to search youtube on these "new buildings" where the refugees moves in as well, as I might have missed it ( was sure i didn't). Nothing, and yes only merchant and troops moves in the not new keeps. Not sure what he's trying to prove here by saying things that aren't true.

On that note. I broke and bought the damned game. I'm a weak willed woman. Though, I won't play it til I'm back from holiday on Tuesday. I really hope the male protag will not bother me to the point that I have to stop playing. It's not about the money, it's the thought of not being able to experience this, because I'm just being excessively weird.

 

WqhurEk.jpg

 

On a serious note: I hope you like it and I can't wait to read your thoughts on it. Hopefully you'll love Geralt. 


  • Uccio, Xetykins et AmberDragon aiment ceci

#5663
line_genrou

line_genrou
  • Members
  • 992 messages

I would recommend anyone wanting to play W3 to at least read The Witcher wiki because starting  with the last game on a trilogy is kinda confusing to be honest.

Or you could play the other two which are amazing games too.



#5664
HowlingSiren

HowlingSiren
  • Members
  • 599 messages

On that note. I broke and bought the damned game. I'm a weak willed woman. Though, I won't play it til I'm back from holiday on Tuesday. I really hope the male protag will not bother me to the point that I have to stop playing. It's not about the money, it's the thought of not being able to experience this, because I'm just being excessively weird.

I'm a woman too, and I much prefer playing as a woman (on that note, thank you BioWare for always giving us that opportunity). But I just loved playing as Geralt. Alongside my FemShep, he's become my favorite protagonist, and I never thought anyone could match her. I hope you'll feel the same way too, looking forward to hearing what you think. Have fun! 


  • Dreadstruck, KBomb, 9TailsFox et 2 autres aiment ceci

#5665
KBomb

KBomb
  • Members
  • 3 927 messages

I'm a woman too, and I much prefer playing as a woman (on that note, thank you BioWare for always giving us that opportunity). But I just loved playing as Geralt. Alongside my FemShep, he's become my favorite protagonist, and I never thought anyone could match her. I hope you'll feel the same way too, looking forward to hearing what you think. Have fun! 

I am throwing you a like and a +1 because this is pretty much how I feel-- except my little warden from DAO is probably my favorite female protagonist, followed by my Shepard from ME1 and Jill Valentine and Claire Redfield and Lara Croft.

 

I have played some fantastic males though and as a woman, it didn't seem lacking at all. Geralt, Nathan Drake and Soap MacTavish, Joel from TLoU, Ethan Mars from Heavy Rain, John Marston from RDR and Cole Phelps from L.A. Niore are all very high on my list of great male protagonists and have brought me many, many hours of great gaming. There are many more, too. I have seen a lot of people say they refuse to play a game that doesn't allow them to be female and I think it is kind of sad, because there are so many stellar games out there that they're missing out on.


  • Dreadstruck, panzerwzh, Akrabra et 4 autres aiment ceci

#5666
Torgette

Torgette
  • Members
  • 1 422 messages

English language

American flag

 

Sorry, can't hear you over the sound of my American-ness.

 

200_s.gif



#5667
Torgette

Torgette
  • Members
  • 1 422 messages

One thing TW3 needs is multiplayer, I think we can all agree about that.



#5668
TheOgre

TheOgre
  • Members
  • 2 260 messages

One thing TW3 needs is multiplayer, I think we can all agree about that.

 

Why?


  • AmberDragon aime ceci

#5669
SnakeCode

SnakeCode
  • Members
  • 2 675 messages

Why?

 

You know, though i'm definitely not a fan of multiplayer tacked on to single player games, I wouldn't say no to online Gwent tournaments. That would be really fun. It also wouldn't affect the main game in any way.


  • TheOgre aime ceci

#5670
AmberDragon

AmberDragon
  • Members
  • 291 messages

One thing TW3 needs is multiplayer, I think we can all agree about that.

 

Erm sorry but no we don't all agree about that, I personally couldn't care less about mulriplayer and it really doesn't need to be added to every single game. Multiplayer is just a way for companies like EA to make even more money nickle & diming players who have more money than sense...


  • panzerwzh, duckley, Uccio et 1 autre aiment ceci

#5671
duckley

duckley
  • Members
  • 1 863 messages

I had to search youtube on these "new buildings" where the refugees moves in as well, as I might have missed it ( was sure i didn't). Nothing, and yes only merchant and troops moves in the not new keeps. Not sure what he's trying to prove here by saying things that aren't true.

On that note. I broke and bought the damned game. I'm a weak willed woman. Though, I won't play it til I'm back from holiday on Tuesday. I really hope the male protag will not bother me to the point that I have to stop playing. It's not about the money, it's the thought of not being able to experience this, because I'm just being excessively weird.

Geralt is great fun to play IMO. I usually play women too. I wonder if I enjoy him so much because of the transitions he has made since first meeting him TW1. So cool to see the growth.


  • HowlingSiren, Ashelsu, KBomb et 2 autres aiment ceci

#5672
TheOgre

TheOgre
  • Members
  • 2 260 messages
@snakecode
I find that idea quite nice

With dragon age multi-player I was really disappointed to find out we couldn't help other players with story missions. I find their current mp an on off experience, only with friends. Otherwise it's just bland.
  • SnakeCode aime ceci

#5673
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 928 messages

One thing TW3 needs is multiplayer, I think we can all agree about that.

35129188.jpg

 

 

But I do like the online Gwent Tournament idea. ;)


  • panzerwzh, duckley, 9TailsFox et 3 autres aiment ceci

#5674
Eelectrica

Eelectrica
  • Members
  • 3 778 messages

One thing TW3 needs is multiplayer, I think we can all agree about that.

No, we can't. What exactly would you do with MP in Witcher 3?

 

A co-op exploration thing could be cool, but the problem is if they worked on MP, the main game would have suffered, and that would have been bad.

They're not under EA's wing where apparently they can say here's the SP budget, now here's the MP budget.

 

Cyberpunk is supposed to have MP. Hopefully it's a co-op campaign type thing. Something BW need to get back to instead of this horde mode nonsense they're suddenly obsessed with if they're going to do MP.

 

Gwent tournament, and I believe someones already doing something about that independently of CDPR.

http://www.gamespot....a/1100-6428050/



#5675
line_genrou

line_genrou
  • Members
  • 992 messages

One thing TW3 needs is multiplayer, I think we can all agree about that.

 

 NO.

Keep Multiplayer away from The Witcher. Well, W3 is the last one, but keep multiplayer away from any good RPG for the love of all that is holy. I pray that CDPR future titles will be amazing RPGs with no multiplayer. Ever.


  • Uccio aime ceci