Prefer these dev hours go to something more constructive:http://www.pcgamer.c...ne-mo-cap-data/
Ha! I live in Sweden just by a park. When i look outside my window right now there are two women sunbathing topless. It's not a big deal.
Norway isn't like that at all, i mean people do it, but it is frowned upon. A guy walking around without a t-shirt and flexing is perfectly legit though, for some odd reason.
Norway isn't like that at all, i mean people do it, but it is frowned upon. A guy walking around without a t-shirt and flexing is perfectly legit though, for some odd reason.
Really? Well we in Sweden have always considered Norway as the weird little brother, lol.
This is how you response to your fanbase! I love CDPR more and more now! GO TEAM YEN!
CDPR's response of lack of Yenna and Ciri's interaction
GingerEffect
"I only responded to allegations that we introduced less Ciri-Yennefer content because of Triss favoritism. My comment was not intended as an explanation for anything else.
Regarding Yennefer-Ciri content and the criticism voiced here, I do not necessarily share that opinion. For me, she never came off as cold. Determined, yes. Knows what she wants. Yes. Geralts reactions to her and her reactions to him seemed to display a weird, but kind of charming dynamic (to me), especially when we get to Skellige.
But I do not want to dismiss or belittle those criticisms even if I do not share them. The thread and the concerns raised have been forwarded just as other community concerns that have generated a lot of activity.
As I was not part of the creation of most of the Yennefer content, I cannot answer as to reasons why things were done in a specific way. Marcin Blacha and the Quest Designers for the Yennefer focused Quests would be the ones who can say more about this."
Regarding to responsing Fan's comments and discussion:
"Points that are raised by the community are discussed between designers and leads, most often. If we agree that something needs to change, we approach production and it is discussed in more detail and with all people who are affected involved. If overall we agree something needs to be changed, we look at how we can make adjustments and what would be required to really fix any given issue.
At that point it is pretty much out of designers hands. We may get the go ahead to do the changes or we may not. This can have various reasons. None of these include us being too lazy to do it 
.
For obvious reasons I cannot discuss specifics. Hope this gives a bit more of an idea of how we process your feedback here."
Again still most people don't get it. Those people finding out how many hrs of sex scenes there are are actively seeking for it. Some of the LPs I've seen did not even have them at all. Just like DAI, those are there for those who cares for it and are optional. Stop being biased, seriously.
This is how you response to your fanbase! I love CDPR more and more now! GO TEAM YEN!
CDPR's response of lack of Yenna and Ciri's interaction
GingerEffect
"I only responded to allegations that we introduced less Ciri-Yennefer content because of Triss favoritism. My comment was not intended as an explanation for anything else.
Regarding Yennefer-Ciri content and the criticism voiced here, I do not necessarily share that opinion. For me, she never came off as cold. Determined, yes. Knows what she wants. Yes. Geralts reactions to her and her reactions to him seemed to display a weird, but kind of charming dynamic (to me), especially when we get to Skellige.
But I do not want to dismiss or belittle those criticisms even if I do not share them. The thread and the concerns raised have been forwarded just as other community concerns that have generated a lot of activity.
As I was not part of the creation of most of the Yennefer content, I cannot answer as to reasons why things were done in a specific way. Marcin Blacha and the Quest Designers for the Yennefer focused Quests would be the ones who can say more about this."
Regarding to responsing Fan's comments and discussion:
"Points that are raised by the community are discussed between designers and leads, most often. If we agree that something needs to change, we approach production and it is discussed in more detail and with all people who are affected involved. If overall we agree something needs to be changed, we look at how we can make adjustments and what would be required to really fix any given issue.
At that point it is pretty much out of designers hands. We may get the go ahead to do the changes or we may not. This can have various reasons. None of these include us being too lazy to do it
For obvious reasons I cannot discuss specifics. Hope this gives a bit more of an idea of how we process your feedback here."
I kind of felt that Ciri was the one kinda of cold towards Yen
It would've been nice to see them bonding after so many years, but then again the main focus was between Geralt and Ciri
Perhaps if one were to actually read the article, then one may realize that this was about zots; not in game sex:https://twitter.com/...438277392834560Prefer the actual dev time to go elsewhere.
I kind of felt that Ciri was the one kinda of cold towards Yen
It would've been nice to see them bonding after so many years, but then again the main focus was between Geralt and Ciri
Ciri is so wild when she is with Geralt, I would love to see her feminine side when with Yen.
But I really impressed by CDPR's attitdue towards their fanbase's concern or criticism. Now I would get a copy of Xbone version (I got PC and PS4 already) so I could contribute to their next project!
Ciri is so wild when she is with Geralt, I would love to see her feminine side when with Yen.
But I really impressed by CDPR's attitdue towards their fanbase's concern or criticism. Now I would get a copy of Xbone version (I got PC and PS4 already) so I could contribute to their next project!
I got a feeling Geralt is the fun parent while Yen is the strict parent lol
On another note, damn they really nailed the animation. I remember Morrigan and Keiran's hug in DAI being so damn awkward and stiff.
Yenna is firm, frequently stern, sometimes masterfully formidable. But she was never boring...
Geralt is kind of a chunky dad easy going but when comes to trouble Yenna will make the right call.
I did read it. But you posted that link about how many hrs total sex scenes w3 got, while quoting my post as if to make a statement. How about linking the DAI hrs instead? But you know what? I dont care because for me its well done, just the right amount and not in your face. And Dorian's butt needs more screen time cuz its cute.
If those 16 hours are deal breakers to anyone, then you probably shouldn't play these type of games. These games are meant to have mature scenes not just for the aspect of "Ha! Look sex", but for the mature audience to gain a sense of back story. So if you can't deal with a sex scene, and that decides which game you choose, then this game is not for you. Again, I don't mean to call you immature, I just mean that this game has many mature themes not everyone is comfortable with.
This shouldn't be an issue at all. There is nothing shameful about consensual sex. Nothing Taboo. Not between a man and a women, both man, both women.Get. Over. It. I also don't think that those 16 hours of development for all these scenes were a waste. I felt them to be quite important.
I've played Witcher 3 almost non-stop since it released. In that time I have come across two, two, very brief and very tasteful sex scenes. That's it.
Nothing beats Yenna's unicorn! 
I don't get these people screaming "sexism" at every turn when it comes to TW3. To be honest, I hate it more when video games try to be all politically correct (which is something DAI does in a couple of occasions). I haven't finished TW3 yet but I've yet to see justification for all these complaints of how the game treats women and how there's sex everywhere. If anything, this game has more powerful women than men. Ciri, Cerys, Triss, Yennefer, the Logde of Sorceresses, and so many other female NPCs that are badasses. And from what I've seen, the sex scenes are more mature than the previous games and you even see Geralt's butt. And sure there are some moments where you see women being treated badly just as there are moments where you see men being treated badly. But both are there to make the player feel all these different kind of emotions throughout the game.
And while it was a gruesome sight, it made me feel something. And that's what I want in a video game, to have all these mixed feelings. I love when there's moments that make me happy and all gooey inside, but I also want moments that make me feel sad, angry, disgusted, you name it. If the game is causing all those emotions on me, is because it's doing something right. I don't want to play a game where everything is rainbows and sunshine, where everyone is treated the same way, where there is no conflict and tough choices to be made. That's pretty much how DAI is and I was bored to death with how safe and clean that game was and how it didn't make me feel anything. I hope this doesn't come across the wrong way though, I'm not some sadist or masochist, I just like it when a game gives me all these different kind of feelings, makes my experience feel like a true rollercoaster of emotions. I can understand how some scenes may be very disturbing to some people but I hate it when others just scream sexism for the sake of it.
And that video of the succubus, just because it shows some breasts it's sexism? A succubus is a creature that lures men with their sexuality to then feed on their energy through sex, so it's natural they take advantage of their looks to seduce men. I don't see how that's considered to be sexism when it's part of the lore. I'm not saying there isn't sexism in TW games, there most definitely is and I think that's the whole point, it's there exactly to convey how harsh life can be in these worlds and gives you the opportunity to make some good deeds. But just as there is sexism, there's other things that are just as bad or worse. But people tend to focus just on the sexism part and ignore everything else, even the strong and powerful women this game has. But this game has a dark theme after all, if you can't handle that, then you better stick to colorful fantasy games like DAI.
If those 16 hours are deal breakers to anyone, then you probably shouldn't play these type of games. These games are meant to have mature scenes not just for the aspect of "Ha! Look sex", but for the mature audience to gain a sense of back story. So if you can't deal with a sex scene, and that decides which game you choose, then this game is not for you. Again, I don't mean to call you immature, I just mean that this game has many mature themes not everyone is comfortable with.
This shouldn't be an issue at all. There is nothing shameful about consensual sex. Nothing Taboo. Not between a man and a women, both man, both women.Get. Over. It. I also don't think that those 16 hours of development for all these scenes were a waste. I felt them to be quite important.
TW3 is pretty fantasy when it comes to gender and sex, it doesn't even try to be realistic or fair to either gender among the common folk (much less evening the playing field with our super-model super-heroes), sex itself isn't as common as it's made out to be but when it does happen it's straight romance novel flair, but then there's a lot of charm to them going that route than trying to be totally realistic, you can tell they had fun making this game.
That's actually the second article to lie about the Baron quest. Nathan Grayson (yes, THAT Nathan Grayson) wrote the first for Kotaku. This one seems to be even more ridiculous though.
I think I smell an agenda.
That's actually the second article to lie about the Baron quest. Nathan Grayson (yes, THAT Nathan Grayson) wrote the first for Kotaku. This one seems to be even more ridiculous though.
I think I smell an agenda.
SJW never changes, I still remember the *****storm when TW2 released. And how the sex cards in TW1 used as perfect example for their agendas. Luckily there weren't gamergate then. Witcher series is always the faveourite target for those so call 3rd wave feminists.
Modifié par BioWareMod01, 11 juillet 2015 - 05:47 .
remove profanity
That's actually the second article to lie about the Baron quest. Nathan Grayson (yes, THAT Nathan Grayson) wrote the first for Kotaku. This one seems to be even more ridiculous though.
I think I smell an agenda.
It's kotaku and polygon. I'm wondering why normal people still take anything seriously coming from this sites.
They have their target audience and this audience doesn't care if anything they write is actually true as long as it supports their agenda.
Speak with Conan O'Brian, then get back to me....
How did they lie about the Baron quest?
The Baron did beat his wife. He admits to it. Geralt can sympathize with him if he chooses. And Geralt can believe that he will really change his ways, something many abusive husbands say in real life before going back to beating their wives.
Meanwhile the wife is placed in a position where she is unable to speak for herself - she is either insane or dead.
And no pity for the baron for his cheating abusive wife? Seriously its a double edge sword. Both are dipsticks imho.
The wife is worse as far as I'm concerned.
Retour en haut