I'm personally trying to defend DA:I's good points from people who rush to claim it's a crappy cheap game and that TW3 blows it out of the water.
Maybe it's a poor idea. In a couple of months the reactions will be more rational when the whole game would be played through. But it sort of pains me to see how people latch onto the next open world RPG to unfairly bash even those points of DA:I that so far has been done better. It seems that TW3 has become another excuse for people who wanted to bash DA:I to do it, no matter if fair or not.
Thats because DA:I's open world sucked
I liked the characters and some of the story missions but the open world was (while quite big) very lifeless and filled with terrible fetch quests
There were no interesting side characters or stories to find (no cutscenes either instead a lame Skyrim camera), Bioware just went lazy while designing it
TW3 on the other hand has great side quests (probably the best in any RPG game I have played, at least so far) they are very interesting, there are always choices to make no matter how small the quest and you even feel for some minor characters in certain situations
I think the good voice acting and cutscenes help here a lot too
And all the comparisons with TW3 are valid both went open world in their third game and I think (at least regarding the open world) that TW3 is better and Bioware needs to look at the game and take some notes for DA4