I like the Witcher ending but I'm not sure how Emhyr doesn't realize Ciri is alright when word of a Witcheress is known all throughout what is now Emhyr's land.
Feedback... be more like The Witcher 3
#10251
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 12:56
#10252
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 12:59
I like the Witcher ending but I'm not sure how Emhyr doesn't realize Ciri is alright when word of a Witcheress is known all throughout what is now Emhyr's land.
Haven't played the game in Polish yet so I can't confirm, but apparently in Polish rather than Emhyr saying "I do not wish to see you. Ever again." he says something that'd translate along the lines of "I do not wish to see you (singular)...you (plural) ever again."
Which could very well imply Emhyr knew Geralt was lying, but let her go willingly.
#10253
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 01:06
Another one! I'm surrounded by traitors an kingslayers... :/I like the Witcher ending but I'm not sure how Emhyr doesn't realize Ciri is alright when word of a Witcheress is known all throughout what is now Emhyr's land.
Anyone who isn't hellbent on bringing slavery to the north?
#10254
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 02:21
- MoonDrummer aime ceci
#10255
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 03:21
Spoiler
I did that on my current playthrough, no idea how it turns out yet though.
#10256
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 05:59
#10257
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 06:17
I prefer the Witcher ending, but the Empress ending is major feels.
Spoiler
- AmberDragon aime ceci
#10258
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 07:34
C'mon. Don't get into any kinds of discussion with a 100% fanboi. Let him live in his perfect little world in his head where Bioware is god and can do no wrong as we have seen on this thread again and again and again. So just let him flap in the silence within your ignore list.
Or just treat his post as comedy gold. Because anyone who blatantly lies about the non existent features of his favorite game just to make it look good is really not worth your time. ( inquisition building new keeps for the refugees, anyone?) Trying to fool people who HAS played the 2 games, unlike him.
On Topic: Trollololo is the best with his "Ravodid" song. Second was the shoe troll. Still Johnny owns them all!
Yeah I know, I tried...I really tried to speak rationally with him, but he just kept digging with those trolling posts. So I finally stuck him on my ignore list, can't deal with that nonsense anymore.
- AmberDragon aime ceci
#10259
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 07:36
A morbid part of me actually likes
- AmberDragon, MoonDrummer et TheOgre aiment ceci
#10260
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 07:45
In retrospect, it really does feel like the book was basically a tie-in to that one quest, doesn't it?
I agree with you, though. Good quest, but a little dense and inaccessible for some players, at least the first time through.
On topic, seems like TW3 does do this very well. I have never read any of the original books. I've played the games, read the ingame codex entries and books and stuff closely, and generally paid attention. As a result, I feel that I have a fine handle on the world, its major players, factions, etc, Geralt's history with all these other characters. The background information is conveyed naturally and organically, which is nice.
I don't know what the precise solution is, because it seems to come down to showing versus telling, and I for one really like the extensive, detail filled codexes and supplementary stuff in DA. I like picking through it for interesting or intersectional stuff. And honestly, the setting in DA seems a lot more expansive, detailed, and ambitious than the Witcher's setting overall, which seems to stick to a much smaller geographical area, with a smaller cast of major players, and a less comprehensively realized in-universe history. Conveying all that organically through the gameplay... might just not be possible. It would be awkward.
I really like the very detailed codices in DA as well. They provide a lot of fantastic background information about the history of the world, and I agree with you even that the setting is more expansive than the Witcher's. I prefer the Witcher's more focused approach though. Try to do to much, and the game will suffer for it. I just get annoyed when we go through a place like the Still Ruins and rather than get to see what is going on, we get fed a bunch of notes and the like. Maybe that is not the best example, as everything is frozen, or rather...slowed to a glacial crawl, but you get what I mean I think.
Seriously though, it's amazing how many people stop to write notes or letters or journal entries in the midst of whatever they're doing in those games. ![]()
- AmberDragon aime ceci
#10261
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 07:48
Another thing dragon age franchise can take form witcher are the finisher moves...
Really the finisher are fast but even realistic somehow i can see them working even for a click kind of combat ala inquisition... The overall animation of the weapon swing is simply amazing and fluid...
Instead in inquisition we have stupid flashy animation anime like... that is a thing that for me is a game breaker element expecially in a western RPG...
instead of...
Witcher3 anims looks fluid amazing and behave more natural... Inquisition anims are choppy flashy and anime style....
Well, that's actually something that they can take from themselves. We used to get really neat finishing sequences when we were fighting something large. Our characters would hop up on the dragon's head and start hacking away. I loved those. Don't know why they took it out.
Sometimes it seems to me that one the goals in DA:I was to strip it of so many things that sets Dragon Age apart.
- AmberDragon aime ceci
#10262
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 07:50
Well done subjecting the people of the North to slavery.
Witcher 2 Roche would be ashamed of Witcher 3 Roche. He lost the right to be broche when he turned traitor.
The north deserves it. They are barbarians and uncivilized at that. Down with Rad the Lad!
#10263
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 07:54
I don't think fallout4 will be this competitor...Maybe will be because many people are overhyped about it.. But honestly bethsheeda does not shine in regard of writing... Yes they do nice open world games but that's it... And since their new policy is dumb down games to make it accessible even to people that dislike rpg... I don't think fallout4 will be my cup of tea since they chosed to use a voiced protagonist...
Is also most likely possible that fallout4 will bring back paid mods... That of course will be cause a huge cut of bethsheeda follower based since they hate paid mods....
Skyrim lost several points on the rate when they attempted to introduce paid mod that is a matter of fact so in the end i think betsheeda now is playing the supergreedy card...
I Really hope to be wrong.... But i fear fallout4 will be more "shooter" than rpg.
I hope your wrong to. Your correct in that Bethesda does not shine in their writing, I really hope they improve that in FO4, though I to am a little wary about them adding in a voiced protagonist. I was perfectly content with the silent one. But...we'll see.
I don't think it will be more shooter than RPG though. Yeah it looks like they have improved the shooting mechanics, but they still have the V.A.T.S. system in place. I love that system to death. Some people are wary about the changes they made to the skills system, but I don't really think it's going to hurt it in the long run.
I'm looking forward to it because I love Fallout, I love post-apocalyptic stories in general. That, and I am really looking forward to building settlements. Really hope that feature is really well implemented.
#10264
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 07:56
Bah, I'll take Tywin Lannister over Radovid the Witless any day. Both are horrible people but at least Tywin doesn't have a pyre fetish. :S
Tywin would so totally own Radovid if they fought a war against one another. Love to hate that dude.
#10265
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 08:06
Another thing dragon age franchise can take form witcher are the finisher moves...
Really the finisher are fast but even realistic somehow i can see them working even for a click kind of combat ala inquisition... The overall animation of the weapon swing is simply amazing and fluid...
Instead in inquisition we have stupid flashy animation anime like... that is a thing that for me is a game breaker element expecially in a western RPG...
instead of...
Witcher3 anims looks fluid amazing and behave more natural... Inquisition anims are choppy flashy and anime style....
Just point out Geralt's sword fight skill is kind of practical as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOXdORyTqVY
and someone awesome just forged Geralt's swords
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJZekaPAd_M
- AmberDragon aime ceci
#10266
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 08:13
Just point out Geralt's sword fight skill is kind of practical as well.
*snip*
CDPR actually has a guy who's choreographed/mo-capped all of Geralt's moves since TW1.
- panzerwzh, AmberDragon et MoonDrummer aiment ceci
#10267
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 08:17
Spoiler
It's canon.
The north deserves it. They are barbarians and uncivilized at that. Down with Rad the Lad!
You just aren't stern enough!
#10268
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 08:21
I don't want to support Radovid or Nilfgaard, but lesser evils and all that.
Radovid is insane, but Nilfgaard discriminates against beards, and a beardless north...doesn't sound ideal. But Geralt's beard shall grow and anyone who stops him can shove it.
#10269
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 08:24
Da details! After 5 play through I'm still missing a lot interaction between Yenna and Geralt.
#10270
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 08:28
CDPR actually has a guy who's choreographed/mo-capped all of Geralt's moves since TW1.
Cool, no wonder the animation is so fluid and practical as well.
This is CDPR's 2008 animation which is quite amazing even by today's standard.
#10271
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 08:35
- AmberDragon aime ceci
#10272
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 11:01
…And honestly, the setting in DA seems a lot more expansive, detailed, and ambitious than the Witcher's setting overall, which seems to stick to a much smaller geographical area, with a smaller cast of major players, and a less comprehensively realized in-universe history. Conveying all that organically through the gameplay... might just not be possible. It would be awkward.
That is basically the result of DA being a deliberately created RPG setting (more or less) and the Witcher setting being the cumulative evolution of bits of background material in the various stories. There just isn’t much ‘Witcherverse’ outside the stories themselves.
You have the same difference between deliberately created RPG settings and universes from books, movies and TV series. If the latter get ‘converted’ into an RPG setting, the writers have to effectively ‘expand’ the setting because there really isn’t that much info and/or there are huge gaps. There may be a difference in scope between one IP and another – one may deal with a single hero’s adventures within a limited geographical area, the other with continent-spanning wars between huge empires – but the actual amount of info will be pretty disappointing in both cases.
Those kinds of RPG settings end up being ‘expanded universe’ stuff that can be retconned out of existence anytime because of changes in the original IP. Lucas wiping out the Star Wars expanded universe is just one well-known recent example.
The actual depth of info in the DA universe, by the standards of deliberately created RPG settings, is actually not that great – large nations have just a single paragraph devoted to them, good luck finding a king’s list or a good idea of how a particular army is organised or a society actually functions. It’s skin-deep, but it gives the illusion of being broader and deeper than the Witcherverse because it looks more expansive and complete.
In the end, having a larger or more structured amount of ‘lore’ doesn’t matter that much in a cRPG, unless it’s realised in terms of gameplay, story and visuals. Few people read in-game codices.
What I do notice in the Witcher games is that CDPR is pretty good in realising the world and in effectively creating ‘new’ world content through their visual design and adding lore by depicting the customs, folk religion and mental attitudes of ordinary people, soldiers and aristocrats. That is stuff they made up themselves, although they follow the Sapkowskian 'recipe' of mixing European mythology / fairy tales, history and classic (fantasy and other) literature.
It’s not perfect by any means, but a lot of times I have a ‘yep, that’s how it is / was / makes sense’ feeling. That is also quite a bit harder than putting some standard fantasy stuff on paper / in a Codex.
- panzerwzh et AmberDragon aiment ceci
#10273
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 11:13
It's canon.
Spoiler
But isn't that from the books ?
#10274
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 11:18
But isn't that from the books ?
Spoiler
CDPR clearly puts Voorhis
- MoonDrummer aime ceci
#10275
Posté 01 septembre 2015 - 11:27
CDPR clearly puts Voorhis
Spoiler
- TheOgre aime ceci





Retour en haut





