They didn't have to abandon damn near every political thread though. I mean they tossed so much from TW2 aside to focus on Ciri, but this isn't Ciri's game. It's a trilogy about Geralt. She's honestly not nearly as interesting to me, in the game or the books. Once you find her, I think that should have meant closure, and the rest of the game should have been about the war. Everything revolving around Ciri represents the worst of Sapkowski's work - it's all high fantasy schlock. It should have been minimized or avoided. We brought this up many times on their site before the game released, and even the lead writer admitted Ciri was an author's pet, which makes me wonder why they included her beyond a sense of obligation to the source material.
Ehh, I have never been one for politics in any case. I love intrigue, but you can have great intrigue without having to involve politics. Politics tend to get dull to me. Which is why despite I did like TW2's story, I much prefer TW3's much more personal stories.
I would agree that Ciri is not that interesting, but I still liked the character. She's got a good heart and that's usually enough for me to at least like a character a little bit. That, and she was a lot of fun to play as for me. I liked her abilities. She could have used more development though.
I would also have liked more involvement with the war, but I get why they didn't go that way. Geralt doesn't give a crap about the war. He might meddle in it from time to time to do things like help a deserting Nilfgardian soldier or whatever, but I really don't think he gives a crap about the overall direction of it. I wanted the Wild Hunt storyline to be more fleshed out as near the end it just felt far to rushed.