I think you're drawing a kinda arbitrary line between ghoul and darkspawn in this case, where both are becoming decidedly unique creatures.
So ghouls are already existing creatures affected by the taint. Darkspawn are beings created with the taint. I do see a difference there in terms of biology. Ghouls are poisoned by the taint, while darkspawn are venomous. Does that reduce the arbitrary line?
That's why it doesn't make sense to me that a female magister would be "poisoned" by the taint, while her colleagues were turned into something venomous. As we don't know the proper effects of the taint, I could accept that the woman was turned into something broodmother-like, a darkspawn able to reproduce, but I would still not categorize her as a broodmother, based on the "poisoned" vs. "venomous" distinction.





Retour en haut






