56 réponses à ce sujet

[von uber]

I'm sill kek that what's-his-name thinks I hate women. .

 

I do apologise, I thought you had posted in this delightful thread http://forum.bioware...s-really-exist/as well as this one http://forum.bioware...91-that-woman/, and it's just a peculiar obsession with Anita Sarkeesian, feminists and now it seems the perceived unfairness of getting more women into STEM subjects.

Again, I apologise.

[Sully13]

We need more people in the scientific comunity regardless.

BS about Shirts oppressing people and scareing people away from the field by telling them that they will be beaten with sticks wont help either.  

[Sully13]

Sorry... you had mentioned special classes for girls. I assumed that meant the girls would be in a class with only other girls?

No probs.

[Billy-the-Squid]

I'm not saying it is a problem that needs to be fixed (a different subject), I'm not saying it is 100% related to sexism (a different subject), I'm not saying feminists are right (a different subject) and I'm not saying there aren't very valid/logical reasons for men to make more (a different subject).

I'm saying there is a gender pay gap. To say differently means YOU are the one who is calling a puddle a reservoir.

 

The sky is blue, water is wet, cats are usually bigger arse holes than dogs, the orange I'm holding is orange and 2+2=4. So what?

 

Sweeping generalisations are about as useful as an autistic child's finger painting. Messy and not very helpful.

 

Much like the statistics which have rolled every sector in the economy together and drawn a correlation based on an arbitrary subject. So the **** what? It's grossly inaccurate and misleading. It doesn't actually mean anything beyond it being a crude, faulty representation.  

[Fast Jimmy]

The sky is blue, water is wet, cats are usually bigger arse holes than dogs, the orange I'm holding is orange and 2+2=4. So what?

Sweeping generalisations are about as useful as an autistic child's finger painting. Messy and not very helpful.

Much like the statistics which have rolled every sector in the economy together and drawn a correlation based on an arbitrary subject. So the **** what? It's grossly inaccurate and misleading. It doesn't actually mean anything beyond it being a crude, faulty representation.

On page one, I responded to the OP saying it was possible universities, faced with a lack of funding and budget cuts, have purposefully chosen the candidates who would accept the lowest pay possible and hence now have more hires that are female teaching STEM classes. Your response was that would not be possible, since there is no gender pay gap.

Two pages later, here we are.

[L. Han]

Hi. How are you all doing? You are all fine, yes? Would you like some tea or do you prefer coffee?

[Sully13]

Yes plese id love some Tea. this has become tedious to view.

 

I do apologise, I thought you had posted in this delightful thread http://forum.bioware...s-really-exist/as well as this one http://forum.bioware...91-that-woman/, and it's just a peculiar obsession with Anita Sarkeesian, feminists and now it seems the perceived unfairness of getting more women into STEM subjects.

Again, I apologise.

Oh the Con-artist thread.