What's the consensus here? Which ones do people prefer?
Staff
Seems pretty easy, Dragon Staff has higher base damage and more overall % attack/crit chance/heal on kill total than the T3 blade/grips can give. Though the upgradable staffs can get more Heal on Kill or Crit Chance at expense of damage (and some staves utility via Fury of the Veil or Mindchill).
That said, seems like if you want to do caster damage, Dragon Staff is an easy, easy winner. Plus I believe Barrier value is based off staff damage, so it wins there as well, right?
1H
Caliban and Sword of the Dragon seem remarkably close. The main difference is +8% crit chance on Dragon vs. 7% more heal on kill and 5% extra damage per 8 meters thing.
If I had to guess, Legionaire wants Dragon due to being tankier and Templar wants Caliban for bigger wombo combo? Though I suppose once you have enough cunning from promotions, Caliban becomes strictly better.
2H
Greatsword of the Dragon, Maul of the Dragon, Sulevin.
Seems fairly simple. Maul of the Dragon for disgusting damage, Sulevin for utility of the proc. Seems like a fair choice depending on group composition? Not sure what the point of the Greatsword there as it lacks upgrade slots so Maul blows it out of the water.
Bow
Seems extremely promotion/gear dependent. Bow of the Dragon has great all around stats, but Punched by the Maker and Cruel Redemption can have 31% crit chance or 54% crit damage upgrades installed, which is insane and might overtake the base damage of the Dragon Bow if you have enough cunning promotions to feed the crit damage and enough willpower promotions to make the +42% attack bonus diluted.
Daggers
I actually don't know anything about dual wield mechanics in multiplayer, so no idea whats important here or how it stacks up.





Retour en haut






