Aller au contenu

Photo

A Thread About Space, Stars, and The Great Beyond


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
397 réponses à ce sujet

#351
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 887 messages

http://www.wired.co....net-annoucement

So, they have found an exoplanet in the habitable range of a yellow sun that is roughly the size of Earth.

Strap on the jet packs, people. We're about to do some Spacin'.

 

I won't get excited unless its more like Earth than Kepler 22b.



#352
Fast Jimmy

Fast Jimmy
  • Members
  • 17 939 messages

I won't get excited unless its more like Earth than Kepler 22b.


How dare you mock the homeworld of the ultraviolet-communicating Glartarx protoclors!
  • LPPrince aime ceci

#353
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 887 messages

How dare you mock the homeworld of the ultraviolet-communicating Glartarx protoclors!

 

Salad.



#354
The Devlish Redhead

The Devlish Redhead
  • Members
  • 2 770 messages

You buy it off Steam. But to be perfectly honest, KSP is, for a good while, more about learning how difficult it is just to get up into orbit, than visiting a far off planet. You shouldn't approach it with the anticipation to be able to build cool space ships from the start, that can do whatever. It's not quite how the game works. Rather, you're like Robert Goddard or Werner Von Braun, and have start to start experimenting from scratch. That's what the game is about. It's a software toy. A space flight physical simulation.

Sure, I do manned missions to Duna's surface (Duna = sort of toy planet corresponding to Mars) with impunity, but I have > 600 hours logged. Granted, that's not all effective time, but includes when the simulation has just been running, or just been on the computer, while I've watched TV or something.

 

 

No no no that's fine I get that. It sounds like something I would like..   I have the "universe simulator" from steam and that is wicked fun but you do have to wait for results when using that.



#355
bEVEsthda

bEVEsthda
  • Members
  • 3 600 messages

No no no that's fine I get that. It sounds like something I would like..   I have the "universe simulator" from steam and that is wicked fun but you do have to wait for results when using that.

 

Well, it's not quite like that. You don't wait for results, so much. More like work hard at fiddling with rockets and try to fly them...

...But anyway, if you do get it, don't do the mistake I did, when I originally purchased this. I immediately started the game in 'Sandbox' mode, impatient to get all the components from the start and starting to build advanced rockets. And then I played around for a couple of hours, confused, overwhelmed and frustrated, and convinced the game had a zillion bugs (I couldn't do anything wrong? or misunderstand anything? could I?), and then I did nothing for months, the game dormant on my harddrive. "-Stupid game!"  (In reality, it works really well.)

 

What saved it, was that I one day had to kill some time on my laptop. This time I chose 'Science' mode or 'Science Sandbox'. This forces you to pursue winning science points, in order to buy new rocket component technologies. And you only have primitive, simple means to start with. This is the key to unlock this game. Baby steps. One at a time. It's more than that. It's the main enjoyment of the game, and builds up anticipation and triumphant satisfaction as each new milestone goal is achieved. At the same time you learn the skills and ropes, so you can take another step.

 

There is also the 'Career mode'. I can't say anything about this, because I haven't tried it. But it also involves finances and management of reputation, structures and personnel.

 

P.S. BTW, there are plenty of Youtube videos about KSP.

 

This one, masterfully captures what the KSP experience can be about.  :rolleyes:

 


  • Katiefrost aime ceci

#356
The Devlish Redhead

The Devlish Redhead
  • Members
  • 2 770 messages

^ ^ ^ ^ See now that sounds like something I can get into.

 

I'm getting this.



#357
caradoc2000

caradoc2000
  • Members
  • 7 550 messages

If I were to start a tavern in space, I would name it Space Bar.

 

Better yet, a tavern for media representatives would be named Press Space Bar


  • Katiefrost aime ceci

#358
Fast Jimmy

Fast Jimmy
  • Members
  • 17 939 messages

If I were to start a tavern in space, I would name it Space Bar.

Better yet, a tavern for media representatives would be named Press Space Bar


MKo7um4.gif

#359
The Devlish Redhead

The Devlish Redhead
  • Members
  • 2 770 messages

A bar in space for the media.. Then open the doors, make sure you invited all the reality tv execs



#360
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 887 messages

http://www.nasa.gov/...cousin-to-earth

 

452b_system_comparison.jpg

 

keplersmallhzplanets.jpg?itok=0CRRMfbC


  • Katiefrost aime ceci

#361
Fast Jimmy

Fast Jimmy
  • Members
  • 17 939 messages

http://www.nasa.gov/...cousin-to-earth

452b_system_comparison.jpg

keplersmallhzplanets.jpg?itok=0CRRMfbC


...hi cuz!

#362
Vortex13

Vortex13
  • Members
  • 4 186 messages

I would like to see a family reunion but a 2,800 light year round trip would be a little much.


  • Fast Jimmy aime ceci

#363
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 887 messages

Here's a concept of Kepler 452-b in the habitable life zone of its star, much like Earth is around Sol.

 

452b_artistconcept_comparisonwithearth.j



#364
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 887 messages

http://www.space.com...ml?cmpid=514648

 

exo-earth-exoplanet-kepler-452b-150723c-



#365
MrFob

MrFob
  • Members
  • 5 412 messages

I think with all this excitement about "Earth 2.0", it's important to keep in perspective how fricking hard it actually is to find these buggers, let alone determine any kind of half way reliable information about them:

 

What people think Kepler sees:

Kepler-452b.jpg

 

What Kepler actually sees:

kepler-feb2-fig-1.gif

 

:D

 

Related article.


  • Vortex13 aime ceci

#366
The Devlish Redhead

The Devlish Redhead
  • Members
  • 2 770 messages

I was just going to post here too. 

 

https://www.facebook...09518399&type=1

 

 

What if?

 

What if there's people there and they like us are looking towards our part of the sky, have found our Earth and are wondering if there's life here.



#367
Katiefrost

Katiefrost
  • Members
  • 3 271 messages

If I were to start a tavern in space, I would name it Space Bar.
 
Better yet, a tavern for media representatives would be named Press Space Bar


It would have to carry scotch. Real scotch.




#368
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 887 messages


  • Katiefrost aime ceci

#369
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 887 messages


  • Han Shot First, Katiefrost et Voxr aiment ceci

#370
Katiefrost

Katiefrost
  • Members
  • 3 271 messages

Apparently not intended for recycle...

#371
Voxr

Voxr
  • Members
  • 6 343 messages

Just stumbled on this video. Thought it was cool.


  • Han Shot First aime ceci

#372
The Devlish Redhead

The Devlish Redhead
  • Members
  • 2 770 messages

Hey what if aliens communicate in a way we can't or haven't looked at?

 

We're looking for EM radio signals, but what if they use other mediums like light? We'd be totally screwed then hey?



#373
Fast Jimmy

Fast Jimmy
  • Members
  • 17 939 messages
This article from yesterday - thought it would be better to put it here than try and revive my previous EM Drive thread:

https://hacked.com/s...ive-propulsion/

So, contrary to the article's title, the team from Germany was able to build a prototype that did generate thrust as is predicted by EM Drive theories, although it still appears to be violating conservation of momentum as well as a few other known laws of physics. Basically, the result is "we are seeing thrust that we can neither explain nor understand."

The beautiful thing about the EM Drive is that it generates thrust from microwaves, meaning electricity alone can generate thrust, even in the vacuum of space. This means that:

1) No liquid fuel is needed (power could. E provided from a solar panel array, a nuclear reactor or some other form of reusable, long term energy source), so that means we've got much less weight sacrificed just to get into orbit, meaning the age old problem of returning from landing missions is potentially alleviated. Let's go manned missions to Mars!

2) Space travel is potentially exponentially faster - conventional thrusters use lots of fuel in the vacuum of space to produce negligible thrust. The EM Drive is generating thrust in a vacuum, meaning it will push just as hard in space as it would in Earth's atmosphere. This means that, despite the completely unknown reason why, we are able to travel much faster than a rocket would ever have before (although this is not a Warp drive - we are not breaking FTL speeds here).

3) It is cheap. Basically a magnetron (which you can find in your microwave) that is properly calibrated and attached to a VERY carefully constructed fulstrom can generate 400 Newtons/100kW. The current scale wouldn't be great for a satellite, but you get fifteen to thirty of those babies strapped to a craft and you can go zipping around the solar system, sun to Pluto, in a matter of months.


Pretty exciting stuff. Still, since the mechanics are still widely misunderstood and it seems to still violate established laws of physics, there is a lot of skepticism and no one rushing to build anything aside from uber-science DIY'ers. Still, very interesting news all around.

#374
Uccio

Uccio
  • Members
  • 4 696 messages

^That is just awesome.

 

On a side note, I keep reading kebab instead of kepler in those pics. My subconscious mind is hungry it seems.



#375
Fast Jimmy

Fast Jimmy
  • Members
  • 17 939 messages

^That is just awesome.

On a side note, I keep reading kebab instead of kepler in those pics. My subconscious mind is hungry it seems.




2:14


Shameless excuse to post a Flight of the Conchords song? How DARE you?
  • Uccio aime ceci