Aller au contenu

Photo

Dormant Mass Relays

Débuté par Heimerdinger , mai 28 2015 04:33

  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
30 réponses à ce sujet

#26
Laughing_Man
Posté 31 mai 2015 - 08:03

Laughing_Man
  • Members
  • 3 614 messages

I have already explained it's not that, It's how to realistically give away information from the plot. If the Lazarus and Cerberus situation happened for someone in real life, He wouldn't know for the meantime why and how they did it.

 

We seem to have a bad case of miscommunications. I don't mean from Shepard's PoV specifically, but rather from an overall perspective.

 

Shepard is not that irreplaceable, especially not from TIM's perspective. Cerberus' investment is unlikely.

 

The death serves no real purpose. Especially as only a short prelude and an excuse for the resurrection.

 

The possibility of a true resurrection is unlikely, especially after a total annihilation of the body.

 

There was no real reason to work for Cerberus, Anderson and Hackett could have given you all the same resources.

 

And more.


#27
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Posté 31 mai 2015 - 08:03

Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
  • Guests

Killing Shepard was not necessary for that plot element. Coma would've served the same purpose without stretching the suspension of disbelief that much. Or (even more interesting, IMO) a serious injury followed with a period of recovery under an Alliance doctor's watch who later turns out to be a Cerberus agent - Miranda. Would've taken care of the tutorial part as well.  

 

That could have worked, Good idea. But i think that how they killed off Shepard was a fresh and original take on protagonists since none of them can get killed.


#28
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Posté 31 mai 2015 - 08:07

Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
  • Guests

We seem to have a bad case of miscommunications. I don't mean from Shepard's PoV specifically, but rather from an overall perspective.

 

Shepard is not that irreplaceable, especially not from TIM's perspective. Cerberus' investment is unlikely.

 

The death serves no real purpose.

 

The possibility of a true resurrection is unlikely, especially after a total annihilation of the body.

 

There was no real reason to work for Cerberus, Anderson and Hackett could have given you all the same resources.

 

And more.

 

Yes, I have already stated that it should have been explained over the course of the series.

 

Cerberus' shifting view was a mystery that baffled me in ME2 and should have been added to ME3 to have a rather special twist about them. But, BioWare ended up making them the giant jerks for no obvious reason.

 

Yes, It doesn't serve any purpose, But it's a fresh storyline element as i have explained above.

 

And i agree. But, Shepard's body wasn't annihilated. The game does very little job in explaining what remained of Shepard body but it has stated that his brain stayed intact.

 

The alliance and the council were denying the collector threat. The Council though it was a human issue and the alliance thought it was random attacks.


#29
Laughing_Man
Posté 31 mai 2015 - 08:17

Laughing_Man
  • Members
  • 3 614 messages

Yes, I have already stated that it should have been explained over the course of the series.

 

And i agree. But, Shepard's body wasn't annihilated. The game does very little job in explaining what remained of Shepard body but it has stated that his brain stayed intact.

 

The alliance and the council were denying the collector threat. The Council though it was a human issue and the alliance thought it was random attacks.

 

"Should have" is not good enough.

 

I don't remember anything about Shep's brain remaining intact, and it makes no sense anyway.

He was exposed to the effects of space - oxygen deprived, deep frozen, got burned to crisp through re-entry, crashed into the ground at the very least

at terminal velocity, and the bowl of grey goo called brain survived intact?...

 

No.

 

Anderson and Hackett had enough pull in the alliance to get enough interest in the cause.

Maybe they wouldn't have got a shiny new Normandy, but they would have managed somehow.


#30
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Posté 31 mai 2015 - 08:20

Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
  • Guests

"Should have" is not good enough.

 

I don't remember anything about Shep's brain remaining intact, and it makes no sense anyway.

He was exposed to the effects of space - oxygen deprived, deep frozen, got burned to crisp through re-entry, crashed into the ground at the very least

at terminal velocity, and the bowl of grey goo called brain survived intact?...

 

No.

 

Anderson and Hackett had enough pull in the alliance to get enough interest in the cause.

Maybe they wouldn't have got a shiny new Normandy, but they would have managed somehow.

 

The should have refers to ME3 problems, That it failed to deliver and finish what original two started. About the brain, It was in ME3, They said that the Helmet kept the brain intact.

 

But Cerberus had its whole might focused on the matter, I don't really see the problem.


#31
Laughing_Man
Posté 31 mai 2015 - 08:23

Laughing_Man
  • Members
  • 3 614 messages

Yeah, ME3 is the most problematic. I agree.


Retourner dans Lore Discussion


  1. The BioWare Forum
  2. → Mass Effect
  3. → Mass Effect Franchise
  4. → Lore Discussion