Argument in favour.
Argument against
Let me know what you think.
Argument in favour.
Argument against
Let me know what you think.
I'm not sure which side to support here...
I stand with Tony
screw the government, as long as your morally right, you don't need outside influences.
captain america I guess
I already know how how retarded the plot line gets to Cap since he is the least moronic.
What?
Is that going to be the plot in the next Marvel movie or something?
Silly question. You can only govern what you can control. Same nonsense as in Hancock when that one lady was spouting her BS about him not being excepted from the constitution. If whoever is upholding the constitution/law/rules can't touch someone, that certain someone de facto is excepted, because what are you going to do about it?
I thought this was a plotline in the mutant titles back in the eighties? Has it been shifted to the Avengers for the next movie?
I thought this was a plotline in the mutant titles back in the eighties? Has it been shifted to the Avengers for the next movie?
Hollywood: pioneering ecological movie productions. Recycle everything!
Huh, I would've figured that Stark would've been against this kind of act.
I don't think that superheros should have to register, so I guess I'm with Captain America.
Gonna side with Cap on this one
As a Nonorganic i am exempt.
As a Nonorganic i am exempt.
so you are not a meatbag, are you related to Hk-47?
I support the Captain. Just look at how much Tony Stark has done to threaten the world already just because he thinks he's always right.
I thought this was a plotline in the mutant titles back in the eighties? Has it been shifted to the Avengers for the next movie?
dude it was a huge crossover event a few years back. but it was a bit of a mess.
you are reffereing to the mutant regestration act. whitch was more of a Mc Carthyesque witch hunt.
where radom citizens would be forced to regester on a public Regestration simply for being a mutant regardless.
This would make active Heroes regester to become Trained payed shield Agents but there identity would be made public.
so you are not a meatbag, are you related to Hk-47?
puhlese dose he turn in to a 68 Shelby GT500? i dont think so.
Captain Murica!
Im against registration.
The whole point of vigilantiism is acting on the understanding that the current powers at be are too inept at handling the problems that you yourself have taken upon yourself.
Its why Batman is Batman instead of being a supercop. The system is broken and hes the answer.
And if for some reason youre STILL for registration, then why bother being a masked vigilante? be a government agent.
Tony Stark is wrong. Labels are for things, not for people.
First question: what defines a man as a superman? (both genders intended)
Registration is a red herring, I think. Heroes live dangerous lives; asking them to give up their secrecy is basically asking to get Peter Parker'd. At the same time regulation isn't a bad idea. All of these heroes do a lot of destructive stuff, and clearly cause some serious problems (Ultron is 100% Stark's fault, and lots of people died because of it). Asking the government to step in to stop a lunatic in a costume from fighting a more moral, less crazy lunatic in a costume is pretty reasonable.
I support Stark. Headless Ned Stark.
I think Spidey was the one to root for in the comic, so I guess I choose him lol.