102 réponses à ce sujet

[andy6915]

Yea, I get those but foot is the only one I just don't get 

 

Even leg makes more sense than feet lol

 

The only fetish you don't get? I can think of plenty I don't get. Most of them have to do with... I'm getting worried posting now, worried some moderator will delete my post for offensive. Anyway, the ones I am thinking of involve... Fluids, and other such elements of biological bodies that really shouldn't get someone off.

 

I do get the blood fetish though, on some level. There is something intimate about cutting yourself and letting your partner drink your blood. I think it has to do with how blood is one of the most vital and precious things in your body and how you're sharing it with the one you love most, and how you're tasting and savoring their very life just like you savor the time spent together. This is one of the weirder fetishes I wish I could try out one day, because it's just so... romantic and sensual, so... Raw. At least when it's with a lover, just randomly liking to drink anyone's blood still seems messed up to me.

[AresKeith]

The only fetish you don't get? I can think of plenty I don't get. Most of them have to do with... I'm getting worried posting now, worried some moderator will delete my post for offensive. Anyway, the ones I am thinking of involve... Fluids, and other such things that really shouldn't get someone off.

 

I do get the blood fetish though, on some level. There is something intimate about cutting yourself and letting your partner drink your blood. I think it has to do with how blood is one of the most vital and precious things in your body and how you're sharing it with the one you love most, and how you're tasting and savoring their very life just like you savor the time spent together. This is one of the weirder fetishes I wish I could try out one day, because it's just so... romantic and sensual, so... Raw.

 

Well I was mostly referring to body part fetishes, I'm not expanding outside of that because those can get..... very weird

[Grieving Natashina]

Well I was mostly referring to body part fetishes, I'm not expanding outside of that because those can get..... very weird

You're not usually one to understate things, but it's well done here.  That's a remarkably tasteful way of putting it.

 

I would not be surprised if the mods had their eye on this thread.

[RevilFox]

Well this conversation turned in a weirdly logical direction.

[Grieving Natashina]

Well this conversation turned in a weirdly logical direction.

Welcome back to the weekends on the forums.  Weird and logic don't usually go hand-in-hand, but the weekends are always the best time for the coolest conversations...and the most entertaining troll threads (no, I'm not calling this a troll thread.)

[andy6915]

I would not be surprised if the mods had their eye on this thread.

 

Hence why I was at cautious as possible during my last few posts. The blood fetish was the absolute weirdest one I'm going to even think about bringing up in here.

[Grieving Natashina]

Hence why I was at cautious as possible during my last few posts. The blood fetish was the absolute weirdest one I'm going to even think about bringing up in here.

You ever get that feeling that you've possibly spent too much time on the internet?  The fact that most of the posters could think of something worse (including me) makes me a little sad somehow.

[andy6915]

You ever get that feeling that you've possibly spent too much time on the internet?  The fact that most of the posters could think of something worse (including me) makes me a little sad somehow.

The internet is where innocence goes to die.

[Grieving Natashina]

The internet is where innocence goes to die.

And where Rule 34 was born.  The part that's the saddest?  All of this existed before the internet.  We just know about now.  

[In Exile]

And where Rule 34 was born.  The part that's the saddest?  All of this existed before the internet.  We just know about now.  

 

It is apparently a fundamental feature of the human condition that, shortly after we discover or create something, someone will ask the age old question "But can I have sex with it?" 

 

(And the sad truth of our existence is that the answer is often "Yes.")

[Grieving Natashina]

It is apparently a fundamental feature of the human condition that, shortly after we discover or create something, someone will ask the age old question "But can I have sex with it?" 

 

(And the sad truth of our existence is that the answer is often "Yes.")

Too true, friend.  The internet is just the culmination of all of it.  

[andy6915]

It is apparently a fundamental feature of the human condition that, shortly after we discover or create something, someone will ask the age old question "But can I have sex with it?" 

 

That's the case for pretty much all apes and monkeys. Proof? I'll quote directly.

 

"When they began the experiment, the researchers at Yale–New Haven Hospital probably never thought the monkeys would spend the money on something that wasn’t even on the menu. Right after they learned to steal, one of the monkeys took one of the stolen coins and gave it to another in exchange for sex. The prostitute monkey then used the token it was paid to buy a grape. Although it was unplanned, this helped show that the monkeys really did understand that the tokens had value. Despite helping their research, measures were taken to prevent this sort of behavior occurring again."

 

http://listverse.com...es-and-monkeys/

 

The context is that monkeys were given money to see what they would do with it, if they would start some kind of basic economy. It was partly to test for intelligence. Well, the very first thing the monkeys did with the money was buy sex. It really is the oldest profession .

[daveliam]

I definitely need to read that study. Any study summary that contains the sentence 'The prostitute monkey then used the coin it was given to buy a grape' has earned my attention.....

[Grieving Natashina]

I definitely need to read that study. Any study summary that contains the sentence 'The prostitute monkey then used the coin it was given to buy a grape' has earned my attention.....

The part that makes me chuckle is I know that someone, somewhere, is studying this for college.  Somewhere, that exact sentence is in a part of a major test/quiz.

[In Exile]

The part that makes me chuckle is I know that someone, somewhere, is studying this for college.  Somewhere, that exact sentence is in a part of a major test/quiz.

 

It's funnier to think of it arising in the context of a doctoral thesis. About 200 pages in, the dissertation surrounding the precise implications of "monkey prostitute" are explored in detail, including whether assigning the identifier "prostitute" is sensible vis-a-vis non-humans.

[Grieving Natashina]

It's funnier to think of it arising in the context of a doctoral thesis. About 200 pages in, the dissertation surrounding the precise implications of "monkey prostitute" are explored in detail, including whether assigning the identifier "prostitute" is sensible vis-a-vis non-humans.

Congratulations.  You're the winner of this month's "Make Coffee Come Out of Nat's Nose From Laughing" award.  

[duckley]

I have no problem sex,  romance, and love making in games. But I don't need to know the details - fetishes, games, toys, proclivities etc etc etc....TMI. Not sure how that adds to the game.

[Super Drone]

My concern about showcasing a more precise sexual identities (outside of Hetero, ******, and Bi) is that I can see "vanilla" getting hedged out in favor of "co-opting" the gay and straight options for other sexualities. You see this already with Iron Bull and Josephine as a BDSM and asexual/chaste relationship (respecitvely) essentially "taking up" two of the options. Now, if you are playing a Gay male PC but you aren't into BDSM.... well better hope you like Dorian. The same goes for Josephine, who I've seen both straight guys and lesbians express disappointment in her romance arc not having any overt indication of sexual expression, but who is our only "other option". 

[BabyPuncher]

Wow, a thread about sex and representation on the BSN that's been around for half a day with no flame war?

Are who enjoy BDSM now yet another oppressed class that necessitates 'representation'?

[Malthier]

You're not usually one to understate things, but it's well done here.  That's a remarkably tasteful way of putting it.

 

I would not be surprised if the mods had their eye on this thread.

 

It'll probably end up locked at some point, just like the last similar topic. Worth a try, tho

[Lady Artifice]

Are who enjoy BDSM now yet another oppressed class that necessitates 'representation'?

You're placing more gravity on the word representation than I intended. I meant representation in the same way that a stick figure represents a man. Basically, I was surprised to see a thread about BDSM go up without a lot of people immediately launching into a fight about it.

But since you're here to fix that, I'll just let go of that feeling.

[BabyPuncher]

I see. I appreciate that clarification.

[Tyloric]

I enjoyed that it was a good representation of BDSM, but I don't like that it was forced. It was implied that my inquisitor needed a place to forget that he was indeed the inquisitor, that it was some sort of unfathomable burden. Reinard, in fact, enjoys his role as the head hancho and doesn't appreciate being told otherwise.

 

But in the long run I suppose that's what head canon is for and is a minor complaint. 

[RevilFox]

I enjoyed that it was a good representation of BDSM, but I don't like that it was forced. It was implied that my inquisitor needed a place to forget that he was indeed the inquisitor, that it was some sort of unfathomable burden. Reinard, in fact, enjoys his role as the head hancho and doesn't appreciate being told otherwise.

 

But in the long run I suppose that's what head canon is for and is a minor complaint. 

I don't really understand this complaint about it being "forced". To be clear, I have not played through it (but I have watched most of it on YouTube), but my understanding is that Bull gives you an "out" before things get seriously BDSM-ey. In effect, he says, "I like this kind of thing. I like you. I'd like to like both of you at once, but if you're not into it I'll understand and we can go our separate ways."

 

To me, this isn't about a group that needs representation (although it is really nice to see it portrayed as anything but super negative in media), it's about your companions and LI's gaining more depth and detail, and feeling more like real people. Sometimes you're going to find someone who's into BDSM and isn't interested, and, in fact, couldn't be happy, in a relationship that doesn't include it. 

[Sylvius the Mad]

It's funnier to think of it arising in the context of a doctoral thesis. About 200 pages in, the dissertation surrounding the precise implications of "monkey prostitute" are explored in detail, including whether assigning the identifier "prostitute" is sensible vis-a-vis non-humans.

I want most things written like that.