766 réponses à ce sujet

[Texasmotiv]

"Spoonful of sugar..." "catch more flies with honey" that sort of thing?

[Yumi]

Ok, you guys. Who freaking buried this thing in the Pet Cemetary?

It just won't die.

[Drasca]

"Spoonful of sugar..." "catch more flies with honey" that sort of thing?

 

[Hellsteeth30]

Ok, you guys. Who freaking buried this thing in the Pet Cemetary?

It just won't die.

I tried a hoodoo ritual to revive my interest in maple syrup, didn't take.

May have been side effects.

Oh and on an unrelated note: R.I.P. Christopher Lee.

[DragonRacer]

 

Archer will make me genuinely laugh out loud every. single. time.

 

No matter what.

 

Carry on.

[Snakebite]

Archer will make me genuinely laugh out loud every. single. time.

No matter what.

Carry on.

Every. Single. Line. Is. Quotable.

One of my favorite shows of all time.

[Drasca]

Every. Single. Line. Is. Quotable.

One of my favorite shows of all time.

 

[Jeremiah12LGeek]

 

THIS THREAD HAS MADE ME ROLL MY EYES SO MUCH I POPPED A DAMN BLOOD VESSEL D8

[Kenny Bania]

Eric Berne's Game's people play, being founder of Transactional Analysis can be a funner (and more enlightening) read. However most of the people on the SB side are children of the id type by this model. They are not adults expecting adult responses.

 

You really just called other posters' behaviour childish? You? Loooooooooooooooooooooooooool.

 

Archer will make me genuinely laugh out loud every. single. time.

 

No matter what.

 

Carry on.

 

You and me both.

[Angelus_de_Mortiel]

Do you have something useful to contribute? Like your own video? Tutorials? Build guides? Exploration of game mechanics? No? GTFO

 

I'm sorry, Drasca. I have made videos of build guides, tutorials, and explanation of game mechanics. You have done none of the above. You made text build guides and have done a lot of insulting people that have dissenting opinions to your own. This forum is not restricted to only content creators.

 

LOL pretty much. What fanatics? yarpen? who only criticizes SB's analysis, and never his character? Unlike all the whiners here that just complain.

 

I see no whining here. I see people calling you on your mistake, and you lashing out in response. You should really just admit your fault, take a slice of humble pie, and more on.

 

Eric Berne's Game's people play, being founder of Transactional Analysis can be a funner (and more enlightening) read. However most of the people on the SB side are children of the id type by this model. They are not adults expecting adult responses.

 

And you have no idea how completely idiotic you sound with this one. You sound like person pretending to be a sports fan talking about a FIFA midfielder that just caught a touchdown pass with a nine-iron during the Grand Prix. (For any non-sports fans, its a use of jargon terms in a way that is meant to impress people that know nothing about the subject)

 

I find it hilarious that you, of all people, are trying to make yourself sound intelligent and/or refined by talking about this book. You clearly have not the first clue about TA or Dr. Eric Berne. You know why I say this? I actually used to attend ITAA conferences in Canada, and wrote a thesis on the methods of Dr. Berne versus Dr. Freud. Someone whom studied into Dr. Berne and knew the TA method would also know that there were certain ethical principles that were established in TA therapy for the psychologist/therapist/psychiatrist to ensure a proper diagnosis:

• All people in the world are completely equal
• Open communication and the free exchange of information between people
• The right and responsibility of all individuals to choose how they will live their lives

Those are the requirements of the person that is to be analyzing another person(s). This was non-negotiable, and the analyst must be above reproach in all of them. It was established this way to ensure accurate analysis, in no small part due to the reluctance of the scientific community to accept psychology as anything but pseudo-science.

 

Based upon that, your statements compared against your behavior leave a clear distinction that your analysis in this matter could never be accurate.

Furthermore, you clearly do not understand the concept of "ego states". A person is not an ego state. A person has ego states. All of them, in fact. For example: I am, at this time, adopting the ego state of "Parent" according to Dr. Berne's concept. I am communicating in a tone of instruction. I have adopted this state in response, as a natural reflex, to a person (you) adopting the "Child" ego state, being that your condescending and occasional aloof tone is an emotional response to external stimuli (being proven wrong publicly is emotional). This does not imply that I am better than you, or vise-versa. It merely is the structure of how people communicate. It's not surprising that you do not understand this, as you are mildly inept at communication in general (a frequent curse of intelligent people), and you are extremely inept at honest introspection.

I doubt you will clearly read all of this, or even understand it. You will likely pick one line out of it, quote it out of context, and make a reply with a diversion or diffusion. I am not debating with you, so it won't matter. I am making this reply to clarify for others what you are misrepresenting (Transactional Analysis), and to make a point that it is unwise to go around psychoanalyzing people in order to belittle them. Extremely unwise.

 

 

 

Moral of the story? Stop attempting to divert, dissolve, or dilute the topic. The terms are clear. Just get to making your video already, even if you do not succeed. Be mature about it. If you can't make the video, that's fine. Just maturely nod to Snakebite that his claim was correct. Seriously, it's time to start acting like an mature, civilized person now. Everyone is wrong sometimes. It's alright. Seriously.

[The Great Bob]

Holy Cow, AdM dropping the knowledge bomb. Impressive stuff. More informative than most of this thread tbh. A lot of Huff but no Puff here.

[Gya]

Lol. I think Mortiel just won the thunderdome. ALL HAIL MORTIEL, FATHER OF DRAGONS.

[Drasca]

I'm sorry, Drasca. I have made bad videos leading people astray with terrible guides and wrong information. You have done none of the above. You made text build guides and have done a lot of insulting people that have dissenting opinions to your own. This forum is not restricted to only content creators.

 

I have correct factual guides and videos, and most of the time you've either got bad guides or mechanics completely wrong. I've criticized you before, and I'm not alone in pointing out how absurdly bad your understanding is of the game, or how misleading your guides have been.

 

 

more allegorical nonsense pretending have a pseudo-intellectual understanding, making prideful accusations to protect his own ego instead of actual communication. Even if true, grad student attending a seminar and writing a thesis is about as useful as one visiting NASA instead of working there--that is, not at all.

 

I'll be blunt and get to the point, as I don't need long stories of false authority. You're aren't nearly as smart as you claim, and you're certainly not right.

[Angelus_de_Mortiel]

To all: As I told someone else, it was not meant to be any kind of epic insult or "thunderdome". I just get very verbose about when people start twisting psychological therapy into a tool for insulting people. It's meant to help people, and things like what Drasca did in the aforementioned statement disgust me.

[Courtnehh]

I'm sorry, Drasca. I have made videos of build guides, tutorials, and explanation of game mechanics. You have done none of the above. You made text build guides and have done a lot of insulting people that have dissenting opinions to your own. This forum is not restricted to only content creators.
 

 
I see no whining here. I see people calling you on your mistake, and you lashing out in response. You should really just admit your fault, take a slice of humble pie, and more on.
 

 
And you have no idea how completely idiotic you sound with this one. You sound like person pretending to be a sports fan talking about a FIFA midfielder that just caught a touchdown pass with a nine-iron during the Grand Prix. (For any non-sports fans, its a use of jargon terms in a way that is meant to impress people that know nothing about the subject)
 
I find it hilarious that you, of all people, are trying to make yourself sound intelligent and/or refined by talking about this book. You clearly have not the first clue about TA or Dr. Eric Berne. You know why I say this? I actually used to attend ITAA conferences in Canada, and wrote a thesis on the methods of Dr. Berne versus Dr. Freud. Someone whom studied into Dr. Berne and knew the TA method would also know that there were certain ethical principles that were established in TA therapy for the psychologist/therapist/psychiatrist to ensure a proper diagnosis:

• All people in the world are completely equal
• Open communication and the free exchange of information between people
• The right and responsibility of all individuals to choose how they will live their lives

Those are the requirements of the person that is to be analyzing another person(s). This was non-negotiable, and the analyst must be above reproach in all of them. It was established this way to ensure accurate analysis, in no small part due to the reluctance of the scientific community to accept psychology as anything but pseudo-science.
 
Based upon that, your statements compared against your behavior leave a clear distinction that your analysis in this matter could never be accurate.
Furthermore, you clearly do not understand the concept of "ego states". A person is not an ego state. A person has ego states. All of them, in fact. For example: I am, at this time, adopting the ego state of "Parent" according to Dr. Berne's concept. I am communicating in a tone of instruction. I have adopted this state in response, as a natural reflex, to a person (you) adopting the "Child" ego state, being that your condescending and occasional aloof tone is an emotional response to external stimuli (being proven wrong publicly is emotional). This does not imply that I am better than you, or vise-versa. It merely is the structure of how people communicate. It's not surprising that you do not understand this, as you are mildly inept at communication in general (a frequent curse of intelligent people), and you are extremely inept at honest introspection.
I doubt you will clearly read all of this, or even understand it. You will likely pick one line out of it, quote it out of context, and make a reply with a diversion or diffusion. I am not debating with you, so it won't matter. I am making this reply to clarify for others what you are misrepresenting (Transactional Analysis), and to make a point that it is unwise to go around psychoanalyzing people in order to belittle them. Extremely unwise.
 
 
 
Moral of the story? Stop attempting to divert, dissolve, or dilute the topic. The terms are clear. Just get to making your video already, even if you do not succeed. Be mature about it. If you can't make the video, that's fine. Just maturely nod to Snakebite that his claim was correct. Seriously, it's time to start acting like an mature, civilized person now. Everyone is wrong sometimes. It's alright. Seriously.

Slaughtered.

[apocalypse_owl]

I'm sorry, Drasca. I have made videos of build guides, tutorials, and explanation of game mechanics. You have done none of the above. You made text build guides and have done a lot of insulting people that have dissenting opinions to your own. This forum is not restricted to only content creators.


I see no whining here. I see people calling you on your mistake, and you lashing out in response. You should really just admit your fault, take a slice of humble pie, and more on.


And you have no idea how completely idiotic you sound with this one. You sound like person pretending to be a sports fan talking about a FIFA midfielder that just caught a touchdown pass with a nine-iron during the Grand Prix. (For any non-sports fans, its a use of jargon terms in a way that is meant to impress people that know nothing about the subject)

I find it hilarious that you, of all people, are trying to make yourself sound intelligent and/or refined by talking about this book. You clearly have not the first clue about TA or Dr. Eric Berne. You know why I say this? I actually used to attend ITAA conferences in Canada, and wrote a thesis on the methods of Dr. Berne versus Dr. Freud. Someone whom studied into Dr. Berne and knew the TA method would also know that there were certain ethical principles that were established in TA therapy for the psychologist/therapist/psychiatrist to ensure a proper diagnosis:

• All people in the world are completely equal
• Open communication and the free exchange of information between people
• The right and responsibility of all individuals to choose how they will live their lives

Those are the requirements of the person that is to be analyzing another person(s). This was non-negotiable, and the analyst must be above reproach in all of them. It was established this way to ensure accurate analysis, in no small part due to the reluctance of the scientific community to accept psychology as anything but pseudo-science.

Based upon that, your statements compared against your behavior leave a clear distinction that your analysis in this matter could never be accurate.

Furthermore, you clearly do not understand the concept of "ego states". A person is not an ego state. A person has ego states. All of them, in fact. For example: I am, at this time, adopting the ego state of "Parent" according to Dr. Berne's concept. I am communicating in a tone of instruction. I have adopted this state in response, as a natural reflex, to a person (you) adopting the "Child" ego state, being that your condescending and occasional aloof tone is an emotional response to external stimuli (being proven wrong publicly is emotional). This does not imply that I am better than you, or vise-versa. It merely is the structure of how people communicate. It's not surprising that you do not understand this, as you are mildly inept at communication in general (a frequent curse of intelligent people), and you are extremely inept at honest introspection.

I doubt you will clearly read all of this, or even understand it. You will likely pick one line out of it, quote it out of context, and make a reply with a diversion or diffusion. I am not debating with you, so it won't matter. I am making this reply to clarify for others what you are misrepresenting (Transactional Analysis), and to make a point that it is unwise to go around psychoanalyzing people in order to belittle them. Extremely unwise.



Moral of the story? Stop attempting to divert, dissolve, or dilute the topic. The terms are clear. Just get to making your video already, even if you do not succeed. Be mature about it. If you can't make the video, that's fine. Just maturely nod to Snakebite that his claim was correct. Seriously, it's time to start acting like an mature, civilized person now. Everyone is wrong sometimes. It's alright. Seriously.

+1. Drasca just give it up. Youre way out of your depth here and you are just making yourself look even more stupid the more you post (and i didnt think that was even possible at this point).

Btw has anyone actually watched drascas zither gameplay? Its terrible. Cant even play notes in the correct order. One of the worst zither players i think ive seen.

@drasca misinformation? Lets take a look at some of the things you insisted was right but were completly wrong about.

You claimed that willpower doesnt affect spirit resistance. Cool beats can be blocked. Cool beats doesnt trigger encore. Power chord triggers encore. Stone fist working as a detonator. Whirlwind and mighty blow working as a detonator pre patch. Flashfire not triggering virulence to spread fear. And more im sure, this is just what I've thought up off the top of my head.

Mortiel has done far more for this game in terms of content creating than you could ever hope to do. His guides are the most in depth guides on youtube. Penguin has hundreds of thousands of people who have viewed his guides. While not as in depth as mortiels, they are still very relevant and certainly useful to many. Are you seriously telling me you are even in the same league as these two? Sure on occasion they have been wrong about certain things, but they actually listen and stand corrected when it happens. Not argue a clearly wrong point because youre drasca and so you cannot possibly be wrong.

[DrakeHasNoFlow]

Welcome to the thundersome!!!

[The Great Bob]

+1. Drasca just give it up. Youre way out of your depth here and you are just making yourself look even more stupid the more you post (and i didnt think that was even possible at this point).

Btw has anyone actually watched drascas zither gameplay? Its terrible. Cant even play notes in the correct order. One of the worst zither players i think ive seen.

 

You haven't seen me yet! Then again, I don't create videos so my lack of skill with the zither will never come to light. 

[Gya]

Welcome to the thundersome!!!

Pork, could you update the OP to include the word 'Thundersome'? It's like a Thunderdome, but it never dies. And then turns into a three-way no holds barred slugfest.

It's so unpredictable, every time you think someone's won, it comes back to life.

[Angelus_de_Mortiel]

I'll be blunt and get to the point, as I don't need long stories of false authority. You're aren't nearly as smart as you claim, and you're certainly not right.

 
Drasca, stop. You are not being blunt. You never were. You use "blunt" as a pretense for being malicious, and you know it. There is no debate on the matter. You're done now.

To everyone else: Although, it's fortunate that others can see that I was approaching it from a place of knowledge, however I'd ask people not to engage Drasca on this topic anymore. He will adamantly refuse all wrongdoing on the matter, which is perfectly fine. I think there is no point in making this any more atrocious or damaging.

 

If the mods are checking this, I think it might be about time for BiowareMod03: "And we are done here." I think Snakebite successfully got it back on topic.

[Gya]

You haven't seen me yet! Then again, I don't create videos so my lack of skill with the zither will never come to light.

Hahaha, you ninja'd me there. But the difference is, I've seen you Zither!, the first time you ever picked him up. And demolished all the things.

Whereas when I Zither!, it's like watching the bastard offspring of epic lag and fat fingers.

Edit: That's why I created my amazing best Zither build, only need to press 1 button.

[Gya]

Drasca, stop. You are not being blunt. You never were. You use "blunt" as a pretense for being malicious, and you know it. There is no debate on the matter. You're done now.

To everyone else: Although, it's fortunate that others can see that I was approaching it from a place of knowledge, however I'd ask people not to engage Drasca on this topic anymore. He will adamantly refuse all wrongdoing on the matter, which is perfectly fine. I think there is no point in making this any more atrocious or damaging.

If the mods are checking this, I think it might be about time for BiowareMod03: "And we are done here."

I agree that things have gone off topic a bit, but the original challenge remains, and I think it's only fair to Drasca to give him time to finish his videos.

Regardless of the nastiness, which has gone both ways, this thread has certainly educated me, at least, regarding cool beats and power chord. (It's also been hilarious at times.)

[Drasca]

Drasca,

 

You claim to stop replying to me, yet you keep on doing so as pretexts to insult rather than communicate.

 

I just get very verbose about when people start twisting psychological therapy into a tool for insulting people. It's meant to help people,

 

Except when you use it to insult of course. That's ok apparantly. If you did have any of the training you claimed, you should have more self control than this, but of course we can't expect much from you either way.

[The Great Bob]

Hahaha, you ninja'd me there. But the difference is, I've seen you Zither!, the first time you ever picked him up. And demolished all the things.

Whereas when I Zither!, it's like watching the bastard offspring of epic lag and fat fingers.

Edit: That's why I created my amazing best Zither build, only need to press 1 button.

 

You should've seen the number of times I fatfingered the wrong note and ended up mashing and hoping for the best. Ugly stuff.

[Gya]

You should've seen the number of times I fatfingered the wrong note and ended up mashing and hoping for the best. Ugly stuff.

1v1 me in the failuredome brah. We're both master race, let's make this happen! I propose the following rules:
First death = 100 points, all subsequent deaths = 25 points, every wrong note = 5 points, dying while trying to rez your opponent in a stupid position = 50 points.

I'm so gonna win