No, I'm stating your comment that video game philosophy is somehow immune to the laws of logic because it's not traditional philosophy is a silly premise.
Logically speaking, the Legion can provide stability and security the NCR cannot. It's over the top to give the game a villain of sorts, but if you take the situation out to its logical conclusion, you'll see that the Legion being in contol over the NCR isn't an evil option, but one that is possibly better for the Mojave, long term.
Uh-huh. Right. 'Logically speaking.' 'Logically speaking' about the Legion. Let's use to logic to logically speak about the logical Legion. Okay.
The same logical Legion concept, that, as I correctly pointed out before, I have literally never once in my entire life see or hear someone endorse, let alone take any sort of action to promote. The same 'logical' concept that would get laughed out any courtroom. That logical Legion.
...
You know, even if everything you said was true, and the Legion really was the best long term option (ignoring that basically every 'wise' character in the game predicts the Legion will crumble when Caesar dies or when they no longer have an enemy to fight), it wouldn't mean anything whatsoever.
Stories can never 'prove' anything. A narrator can write and say anything he pleases. I could easily write a story with a society that, say, worships armadillos. Every facet of society is built to please and honor armadillos. And I could easily write them as the most intelligent, moral, successful, and happiest society in the story.