Aller au contenu

Photo

Does Andromeda have an artificial extinction cycle? - Exploring the ending choices without exploring the ending choices


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
18 réponses à ce sujet

#1
CosmicGnosis

CosmicGnosis
  • Members
  • 1 591 messages

Because if it doesn't, things are going to get interesting very quickly. How many sentient species are there? Is there an indisputable "most advanced" species that can easily dominate or destroy the others? Without an extinction cycle, multiple species can arise and evolve at different times and rates, which means that they're not on an equal playing field. So then how advanced is the technology? How destructive are the existing weapons of mass destruction? Can these weapons affect the entire galaxy? The lack of an artificial extinction cycle means that technology can become too advanced too quickly, and could cause catastrophic damage to the galaxy. Foolish organics could accidentally destroy themselves and countless other species. And what is the synthetic situation? It's entirely possible that Andromeda is dominated by a synthetic species, just like its galactic neighbor once experienced. But if this is the case, what does this synthetic species plan to do with Andromeda? It could literally be anything. 

 

Without something to keep all of this in check, it practically is the Wild West.



#2
CptFalconPunch

CptFalconPunch
  • Members
  • 466 messages

Because if it doesn't, things are going to get interesting very quickly. How many sentient species are there? Is there an indisputable "most advanced" species that can easily dominate or destroy the others? Without an extinction cycle, multiple species can arise and evolve at different times and rates, which means that they're not on an equal playing field. So then how advanced is the technology? How destructive are the existing weapons of mass destruction? Can these weapons affect the entire galaxy? The lack of an artificial extinction cycle means that technology can become too advanced too quickly, and could cause catastrophic damage to the galaxy. Foolish organics could accidentally destroy themselves and countless other species. And what is the synthetic situation? It's entirely possible that Andromeda is dominated by a synthetic species, just like its galactic neighbor once experienced. But if this is the case, what does this synthetic species plan to do with Andromeda? 

 

We don't know ****.


  • Massa FX et Swan Killer aiment ceci

#3
CosmicGnosis

CosmicGnosis
  • Members
  • 1 591 messages

We don't know ****.

Whoa there, cowboy. These are just questions that we should think about before we get more info about the setting. It's possible that Andromeda could serve as an example of what happens when you don't have something like the Reapers. 



#4
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

It probably doesn't



#5
Jeremiah12LGeek

Jeremiah12LGeek
  • Members
  • 23 706 messages

It's all good.

 

77017-19956-galactus.jpg

 

Galactus keeps them in check.


  • BloodyTalon, DextroDNA et CrutchCricket aiment ceci

#6
dreamgazer

dreamgazer
  • Members
  • 15 742 messages
It's certainly possible, and would answer the questions as to how we'd get around Andromeda and why civilizations aren't advanced entirely out of proportion.

#7
Massa FX

Massa FX
  • Members
  • 1 930 messages

There's no data to indicate yea or nae.

 

Insufficient data.

 

Shutting down.



#8
CosmicGnosis

CosmicGnosis
  • Members
  • 1 591 messages

I think it would be cool if BioWare used this new story to explore the ending choices without actually exploring the ending choices. Basically, we could see what happens when a galaxy is the Wild West and lacks any kind of large-scale and impersonal galactic police. Or maybe this galaxy is controlled by a synthetic species that is completely unlike the Reapers. And there might even be the occasional organic-synthetic symbiosis.



#9
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 227 messages

Because if it doesn't, things are going to get interesting very quickly. How many sentient species are there? Is there an indisputable "most advanced" species that can easily dominate or destroy the others? Without an extinction cycle, multiple species can arise and evolve at different times and rates, which means that they're not on an equal playing field. So then how advanced is the technology? How destructive are the existing weapons of mass destruction? Can these weapons affect the entire galaxy? The lack of an artificial extinction cycle means that technology can become too advanced too quickly, and could cause catastrophic damage to the galaxy. Foolish organics could accidentally destroy themselves and countless other species. And what is the synthetic situation? It's entirely possible that Andromeda is dominated by a synthetic species, just like its galactic neighbor once experienced. But if this is the case, what does this synthetic species plan to do with Andromeda? It could literally be anything. 

 

Without something to keep all of this in check, it practically is the Wild West.

If Andromeda doesn't have an extinction cycle, then humans are less than cave men with pointy sticks invading the WIld West.

 

But that doesn't matter, because this is, of course, a great place to start.



#10
Gwydden

Gwydden
  • Members
  • 2 812 messages
You have to account for the natives not being able to disintegrate the settlers with a thought.

So my guess is, there's one.

#11
alienatedflea

alienatedflea
  • Members
  • 795 messages

Well there is nothing to suggest it but maybe since there might not be an artificial extinction cycle that sentient species follow the Apex Theory(or whatever it is called) where civilizations basically follow a lifespan...rise and fall. where the civilization is in decline for some reason like for example Nuclear Arms might be the end of Humanity as we know it.  Nothing really tells us that other civilizations/aliens might behave like that but then again nothing tells us that they wouldn't either. 



#12
AlanC9

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 539 messages
Another model is that sentient races evolve past having much to do with having much in common with lesser races. So the advanced races are right there but don't care that humans have shown up.

#13
CptFalconPunch

CptFalconPunch
  • Members
  • 466 messages

Whoa there, cowboy. These are just questions that we should think about before we get more info about the setting. It's possible that Andromeda could serve as an example of what happens when you don't have something like the Reapers. 

 

Have your fun, just remember, you know nothing cosmic Gnosis.



#14
SardaukarElite

SardaukarElite
  • Members
  • 3 760 messages

Do we know that the Reapers only stuck to one galaxy? I mean, if you've got 49,000 years to kill...

 

Otherwise, seems like a good question to hang plot things on.



#15
CrutchCricket

CrutchCricket
  • Members
  • 7 718 messages

Or... how about we forget that bullshit and come up with something new?

 

Isn't that the point of all this?


  • caradoc2000 aime ceci

#16
Xen

Xen
  • Members
  • 646 messages

They have to find some way to circumvent the organic-synthetic coexistence problem that they created as well, unless we just want a galaxy full of robots and software drawing resources from planets with evidence of extinct civilizations on them.

Unless they are willing to acknowledge that it was a bullshit dichotomy or introduce some "not-Reapers" for the Andromeda setting.



#17
CrutchCricket

CrutchCricket
  • Members
  • 7 718 messages

Unless they are willing to acknowledge that it was a bullshit dichotomy

One can dream...



#18
CptFalconPunch

CptFalconPunch
  • Members
  • 466 messages

They have to find some way to circumvent the organic-synthetic coexistence problem that they created as well, unless we just want a galaxy full of robots and software drawing resources from planets with evidence of extinct civilizations on them.

Unless they are willing to acknowledge that it was a bullshit dichotomy or introduce some "not-Reapers" for the Andromeda setting.

 

 

One can dream...

 

That would be cool, it would indicate they have grown as writers. What would be even cooler though, if they managed to merge it into the story without it being the only way, that would make the new games surpass the older ones in scale, without actually enveloping a bigger threat.



#19
CrutchCricket

CrutchCricket
  • Members
  • 7 718 messages

Walters is still trusted creatively.

 

I'm not hopeful.