79 réponses à ce sujet

[TheKomandorShepard]

1. Not an obvious one. In case they end up being equal, Inquisitor can open a rift and hope HoF fall in it or something. Or pull a kamikaze with it, so no one wins. Draw is still better than a loss.

 

2. The mark is blind luck.

 

3. No. Not from skills. Had the player only been skilful, there would be far less chance of them getting picked as The Inquisitor. Might not even gain more notice than a good field sergeant. So then them being chosen by the hands of the divine to become Inquisitor depends on the mark. The mark is blind luck. So point stands. The power of the player (the inquisitor) is given by someone else. Something that is given and not earned can be taken away just as easily.

 

Warden needs to have the taint to kill the archdemon. Not having it however, wouldn't stop them from uniting Ferelden and helping Alistair reach the archdemon. They have that power because of their capabilities.

 

 

1.They would need to be blind and well long dead if they were that clumsy ,from what i know nor they can pull a kamikaze with it.

 

2.And i like pancakes as revelant to what i said before.

 

3.And? Again that only gave occasion for inquisitor to prove himself as blight and ability to kill an archdemon gave it to the warden without it the warden still would be in same place as probably would be inquisitor.

 

The warden was alive only because flemeth saved him/her in first place, had s/he not become grey warden and didn't end in situation that gave them access to certain groups slim chances s/he would have become HoF. So pretty much combination of luck with skills.

 

Anchor was mean to deal with situation as for an example treaties that warden had, in fact it was pretty much irrelevant after the breach. 

[GrinningRogue]

1.They would need to be blind and well long dead if they were that clumsy ,from what i know nor they can pull a kamikaze with it.

 

2.And i like pancakes as revelant to what i said before.

 

3.And? Again that only gave occasion for inquisitor to prove himself as blight and ability to kill an archdemon gave it to the warden without it the warden still would be in same place as probably would be inquisitor.

 

The warden was alive only because flemeth saved him/her in first place, had s/he not become grey warden and didn't end in situation that gave them access to certain groups slim chances s/he would have become HoF. So pretty much combination of luck with skills.

 

Anchor was mean to deal with situation as for an example treaties that warden had, in fact it was pretty much irrelevant after the breach. 

 

1. You don't like unreliable weapons. I say unreliable weapons are still weapons. Doesn't seem like we're gonna agree on this one.

2.  

3. Anyone capable + the mark = Inquisitor. Anyone capable + the taint = a grey warden (but not necessarily HoF). Anyone from Origin story (means they are capable, probably more so than other capable person) + the taint = HoF.

 

The inquisitor's power is given to the person by someone else. Someone else accumulated that power. The warden's power is accumulated from threatening/persuading everyone to follow them. They do it by themselves. The Inquisitor feels like a puppet because of that.

[TheKomandorShepard]

1. You don't like unreliable weapons. I say unreliable weapons are still weapons. Doesn't seem like we're gonna agree on this one.

2.

3. Anyone capable + the mark = Inquisitor. Anyone capable + the taint = a grey warden (but not necessarily HoF). Anyone from Origin story (means they are capable, probably more so than other capable person) + the taint = HoF.

 

The inquisitor's power is given to the person by someone else. Someone else accumulated that power. The warden's power is accumulated from threatening/persuading everyone to follow them. They do it by themselves. The Inquisitor feels like a puppet because of that.

1.Again you used anchor as obvious advantage that would make inquisitor win what is false because as i explained it doesn't provide advantage.

2.Know i guess you know what i feel.

3.Again it wasn't power of intimidation or persuasion but simple fact that the warden had treaties and was associated with grey wardens what means his/her powers came from grey wardens...

[Kukuru]

1.Again you used anchor as obvious advantage that would make inquisitor win what is false because as i explained it doesn't provide advantage.

2.Know i guess you know what i feel.

3.Again it wasn't power of intimidation or persuasion but simple fact that the warden had treaties and was associated with grey wardens what means his/her powers came from grey wardens...

 

The Warden had the treaties but during the Blight it was more like some sort of courtesy act since s/he had to save people's butts from inner problems in order to get their support. 

 

The Inquisition had Josephine, Leliana, Cullen and Cassandra doing all that work, not the Inquisitor. 

[TheKomandorShepard]

The Warden had the treaties but during the Blight it was more like some sort of courtesy act since s/he had to save people's butts from inner problems in order to get their support. 

 

The Inquisition had Josephine, Leliana, Cullen and Cassandra doing all that work, not the Inquisitor. 

 

Treaties in first place gave the warden access to groups warden recruited without them he wouldn't get it, even if they were pretty much useless when it comes to recruiting them.

 

Not rly did leliana ,josephine or cullen recruited mages or templars? Did they closed breach? Did they stop corypheus?And so goes on, I explained it many times and i will explain it once again it is chain of command and inquisitor is on top of it if you want to argue on that as well i can argue that josephine , leliana and cullen didn't do jack only people in the field did.