Yes, I think 4 Bisexual options are the best, and if not for the whole "playersexual" nonsense we may have gotten more of them. it means fewer romances that make some people happy, it allows for smaller crews, it also means despite fewer options there are still 2 romances for everyone. Also a number devs can handle, and can do the best with.
It's refreshing to see that I'm not the only one with this preference. The fewer romance arcs they write, the more content each can have, and the more integrated they can be with the overall plot.
It also means you're not gated out of any of the LIs provided. Hear that, Cassandra?
Representation is not a big deal to me, personally - and I think it can be satisfied with other NPCs. DAO gave us Wade-Herren and Branka-Hespith, although more representation of healthier relationships than the latter would be nice.
Everyone knows that DA2 was a bit rushed, but I feel the characters were a bit one dimensional compared to previous and later companions. That had nothing to do with how their romances were bisexual though. And everything to do with the fact the game came out really quick.
I think it was the nature of the beast that was DA2. The characters seemed more one dimensional because they were used to provide exposition on the whole 'Mages vs. Templars / Muggles' and 'Blood Mages vs. everyone' themes - and that got a bit overbearing at times.
So in general I feel 4 bi romances for small casts, and 2/2/2 for larger ones.
Works for me.





Retour en haut




