Yes, bestiality is cross-species sexual activity between humans and non-humans.
Ofcourse asari, turians, drell, etc. are animals. Humans are animals too.
Yeah, okay you troll. You don't get to change definitions to make them fit your narrative.
In everyday non-scientific usage the word excludes humans – that is, "animal" is often used to refer only to non-human members of the kingdom Animalia; often, only closer relatives of humans such as mammals, or mammals and other vertebrates, are meant.
Yeah, okay you troll. You don't get to change definitions to make them fit your narrative.
In everyday non-scientific usage the word excludes humans – that is, "animal" is often used to refer only to non-human members of the kingdom Animalia; often, only closer relatives of humans such as mammals, or mammals and other vertebrates, are meant.
You must have been sleeping during biology 101. Humans are definitely animals, part of the hominid clade, members of the great ape family and the mammalian class.
Yeah, okay you troll. You don't get to change definitions to make them fit your narrative.
In everyday non-scientific usage the word excludes humans – that is, "animal" is often used to refer only to non-human members of the kingdom Animalia; often, only closer relatives of humans such as mammals, or mammals and other vertebrates, are meant.
I like how your copy and paste from wikipedia proves disproves absolutely nothing, and on the contrary, works against you. Scientifically, humans are animals as it infers.
You certainly are one to talk about changing definitions for one's personal benefit.
I like how your copy and paste from wikipedia proves disproves absolutely nothing, and on the contrary, works against you. Scientifically, humans are animals as it infers.
You certainly are one to talk about changing definitions for one's personal benefit.
LMAO you're right. I just looked up the Wiki page for animals, and I love how DaemionMoadrin left out the last line of the 'etymology' paragraph to "prove his point" and then dares to accuse me of changing definitions to fit my narrative. :')
Here's the full paragraph from the wiki page:
"The word "animal" comes from the Latin word animalis, meaning "having breath". In everyday non-scientific usage the word excludes humans – that is, "animal" is often used to refer only to non-human members of the kingdom Animalia; often, only closer relatives of humans such as mammals, or mammals and other vertebrates, are meant. The biological definition of the word refers to all members of the kingdom Animalia, encompassing creatures as diverse as sponges, jellyfish, insects, and humans."
LMAO you're right. I just looked up the Wiki page for animals, and I love how DaemionMoadrin left out the last line of the 'etymology' paragraph to "prove his point" and then dares to accuse me of changing definitions to fit my narrative. :')
Here's the full paragraph from the wiki page:
"The word "animal" comes from the Latin word animalis, meaning "having breath". In everyday non-scientific usage the word excludes humans – that is, "animal" is often used to refer only to non-human members of the kingdom Animalia; often, only closer relatives of humans such as mammals, or mammals and other vertebrates, are meant. The biological definition of the word refers to all members of the kingdom Animalia, encompassing creatures as diverse as sponges, jellyfish, insects, and humans."
Yes, I know. Outside of biology no one describes humans as animals. What's your point again? Are you a biologist now? "In everyday non-scientific usage the word excludes humans" is the part you should pay attention to.
Yes, I know. Outside of biology no one describes humans as animals. What's your point again? Are you a biologist now? "In everyday non-scientific usage the word excludes humans" is the part you should pay attention to.
Quite an evoking of Argumentum ad populum there.
Wow, you didn't even read that, did you? Common usage is entirely different from "false belief the majority holds to be true". 
Wow, you didn't even read that, did you? Common usage is entirely different from "false belief the majority holds to be true".
You must be one of those people who thinks that the Theory of Evolution is "just a theory" because of the common usage of the word "theory".
Quite an evoking of Argumentum ad populum there.
You do realize that argumentum ad populum does not, in fact, apply to semantics arguments?
Argumentum ad populum states that multiple individuals' belief in a statement does not correlate with its truth. Language is entirely a social construction. It has value in so far as someone is able to recognize what you're trying to say, hence why appeal to populus is a viable defense.
Yeah, okay you troll. You don't get to change definitions to make them fit your narrative.
In everyday non-scientific usage the word excludes humans – that is, "animal" is often used to refer only to non-human members of the kingdom Animalia; often, only closer relatives of humans such as mammals, or mammals and other vertebrates, are meant.
It's still bestiality or zoophilia. Given, those words have negative connotations and etymologies based upon there being a clear distinction between humans and lesser Earth animals as far as being of sufficient cognitive ability to give mutual consent is concerned, a distinction which doesn't exist for the other animal species in ME.
Either way YHBT. Getting one's Kirk on has existed in science fiction for nearly half a century now so I don't know how people still take offense.
The abomination that is robosexuality, on the other hand.......
The abomination that is robosexuality, on the other hand.......
I don't see the offense here. Robosexuality is no different than masturbation with a sex toy. Not something I'd do, but hey, if you're into that sort of thing, then who am I to stop you?
I don't see the offense here. Robosexuality is no different than masturbation with a sex toy. Not something I'd do, but hey, if you're into that sort of thing, then who am I to stop you?
Nah, it's more like literally being emotionally and sexually attracted to your dildо and taking it on dates or dancing with it (to give examples from ME3), rather than just seeing it for the tool that it is.
If I knew someone who told me there was no workplace regulation on them dating their office desktop computer IRL, I'd be very disturbed.
Seeing as how you're the only one here talking about alien inferiority, you could enlighten us.
Yeah, this has been fun but since you selectively ignore everything that doesn't fit your narrative I don't see why I should bother.
Yeah and you were 100% scientific when you accused everyone who was in a romance with an alien of virtual bestiality. Of course you didn't mean it to sound derogatory and insulting, not to mention that describing humans as animals is often done by racists to make a demographic seem inferior.
Applying a definition that doesn't account for alien lifeforms on the same level as humans literally makes you look like an ass.
Respond to this first and then I'll see if I can make time to play with you some more.
I don't see the offense here. Robosexuality is no different than masturbation with a sex toy. Not something I'd do, but hey, if you're into that sort of thing, then who am I to stop you?
It's QMR, this is about the Geth.
Yeah, this has been fun but since you selectively ignore everything that doesn't fit your narrative I don't see why I should bother.
Dunno bro, seems like you're the only one with a narrative here. We're not talking about alien or race inferiority nor are we trying to rationalize how humans or aliens aren't animals. That's all on you.
Dunno bro, seems like you're the only one with a narrative here. We're not talking about alien or race inferiority nor are we trying to rationalize how humans or aliens aren't animals. That's all on you.
That's why you ignored the second half of my post?
That's why you ignored the second half of my post?
I don't feel like repeating myself.
Dunno bro, seems like you're the only one with a narrative here. We're not talking about alien or race inferiority nor are we trying to rationalize how humans or aliens aren't animals. That's all on you.
Oh, don't do that. Have the cajones to stand by what you said and what you meant when you said it.
I stand 100% by what I said.
I stand 100% by what I said.
Really?
Why are so many people on this forum so much into bestiality? Gross.
So this was non-judgemental? Cause that "gross" doesn't quite fit.
It was the scientific definition you said? Are you sure that's what you meant? You didn't mean to imply anything else?
What I meant to say is exactly there in that post. It's pretty damn self-explanatory. I don't think it needs any extra explaining.
I'll take Heretic of Time at his word, then, and answer honestly.
I'm into Mass Effect "bestiality" because the "other species" are pretty much indistinguishable from humans in any meaningful moral or aesthetic sense. I'm into it more than Mass Effect's human romance because the alien party members are more interesting and enjoyable than the human party members.
See now that's a honest response. You're not trying to tip-toe around it. I can respect that.
See now that's a honest response. You're not trying to tip-toe around it. I can respect that.
But it's still gross?
Retour en haut
