CPU @100%
#26
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 12:12
On the other hand if a E8400 is running 100% there's a good chance this might be a bug that's hindering the performance, rather than a sign of the game using all resources properly.
#27
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 12:18
#28
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 02:59
Wiz33 wrote...
E6750 Both core at 98%+
it might be an AMD issue
#29
Guest_Draetor_*
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 03:08
Guest_Draetor_*
#30
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 03:11
#31
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 03:12
Modifié par Kiddeth, 06 novembre 2009 - 03:13 .
#32
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 03:14
3.0ghz Dual Core
2gb ram
ATI x1900 XTX 512mb
I was getting the same problem while watching through my ATI Control Panel....it was draving the temperature of the graphics card mad with overheating.
I took off the setting of "Frame Buffer" and I can EASILY now play without any worry of temperature going into the "red".
#33
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 03:42
KillaManiac wrote...
I have a
3.0ghz Dual Core
2gb ram
ATI x1900 XTX 512mb
I was getting the same problem while watching through my ATI Control Panel....it was draving the temperature of the graphics card mad with overheating.
I took off the setting of "Frame Buffer" and I can EASILY now play without any worry of temperature going into the "red".
ok ill look into that
thanks
#34
Posté 17 novembre 2009 - 07:07
Us Intel users are having the exact same issue. If I did not have a Prolitech Megahalems in a HAF cooling my quad, I would likely be in serious trouble like so many here are.
And for the record, my game runs "perfect" as well. Those of us who's game isn't crashing doesn't make us superior, so stop poking your chests out. This game is going to seriously reduce the life of your CPU regardless of whether you're crashing or not if you play it for as long as most of us are going to play this game (it is such an amazing game).
But what mongrel would run Prime95 torture on their CPU for 400 hours? Mine could pass it - my system is as stable as a rock. But that doesn't mean I'm dumb enough to do it and seriously reduce its lifespan and go begging to burn the chip up either.
Well that is basically what the game is doing to everyone's system right now. Its running a constant torture test on your CPU. Its not good and not healthy for it. This should be their highest priority fix at the moment.
Aside from that......major technical issue.....gawd its an amazing game.
#35
Posté 17 novembre 2009 - 02:42
Same here, both core locked at 100% constantly. But my computer didn't crashed yet (knock on wood).
System Specs:
Intel dual core @ 3Ghz
memory : 3 Gb
OS : XP SP3
GC : ATI Radeon HD 4890 @ 1Ghz
I hope Bioware developpers will found a solution quickly
#36
Posté 17 novembre 2009 - 10:00
#37
Posté 17 novembre 2009 - 10:45
MarcAntony wrote...
Most peope do not have killer cooling systems like some of us and their CPUs cannot handle 100% stress testing for more than 1hr.
This is not true. I agree with you that the game should not be taking all of the CPU it can get and that it is not a good idea to stress the CPU like this (it's a waste of electricity), but every system should be able to sustain this. You don't need a killer cooling system -- if a machine cannot sustain maximized CPU usage for prolonged periods of time, there is something wrong with it.
Note that while games generally don't use 100% of the CPU, there is a lot of software that does (video encoding, compression/decompression, compiling, etc.). The CPU is not harmed by this and the system should be able to keep it up indefinitely. That said, they should definitely fix this issue as it will be rather annoying during summer (right now, I can just turn down the heating to account for my laptop
#38
Posté 18 novembre 2009 - 12:34
#39
Posté 18 novembre 2009 - 12:39
#40
Posté 18 novembre 2009 - 01:19
Disabling one core doesnt really hurt performance as much as you think it would if it were truely needing that extra processing power.
Usually, you can run a game on the highest settings (mas AA and all) and the CPU will become less consumed, as it has to wait on the GPU as it begins to struggle - not in this case, my cpu is 100% all the dam time.
I mean 100% from the very start .... 100% at the EA intro movie? THE INTRO?!? wth
Modifié par yabbering_yeti, 18 novembre 2009 - 01:36 .
#41
Posté 18 novembre 2009 - 01:39
#42
Posté 18 novembre 2009 - 01:50
#43
Posté 18 novembre 2009 - 02:15
yabbering_yeti wrote...
It does seem odd to me though, when alt-tabbed its at 100% - But the PC can run fine. I can browse and do whatever, without slowdown. Usually if something is using 100% the rest of the processes can't get any processing time in and the system becomes very slow indeed. How is this even possible? Since my first PC, a 486, I haven't seen a system act like this when something is using 100% CPU. Is it a false 100% report?
Disabling one core doesnt really hurt performance as much as you think it would if it were truely needing that extra processing power.
Usually, you can run a game on the highest settings (mas AA and all) and the CPU will become less consumed, as it has to wait on the GPU as it begins to struggle - not in this case, my cpu is 100% all the dam time.
I mean 100% from the very start .... 100% at the EA intro movie? THE INTRO?!? wth
you know that's a really good point... if it's delivering a false 100%, it might be tricking the system into not allocating enough resources to the game, thus causing all the slowdown problems everyone's been having.
#44
Posté 28 novembre 2009 - 06:47
#45
Posté 28 novembre 2009 - 11:02
Wayzor wrote...
Got the same problem. Whenever i start the game it takes 2 mins and i got 100% cpu, and then its 100% on all cores. have tried all settings but no change.
no other games i got uses so much cpu.. only flight sim x manage to use 70-90% at all max settings.
normal cpu use is from 1-4% at desktop and 20-40% in most games.
currently running DA with every setting at max in game, strange thing is that everything was fine yesterday...
system spec:
Win 7 64 bit
Nvidia 260 gtx
6 GB ram
550W psu
Core 2 Quad 2,4GHz
Try setting the affinity to core 0 mate i run a amd 4800+ and it runs at 100% when i set the affinity to one core it drops to 69-80%
#46
Posté 07 décembre 2009 - 12:49
Nvidia 295 GTX
Intel 3.2Ghz Core 2 Duo
4 Gigs of ram
Striker II NSE mobo
Is there a fix for this yet?
#47
Posté 07 décembre 2009 - 01:10
But its still stable though although I had to quit every two hours because of the lag times when loading area transitions.
#48
Posté 04 janvier 2010 - 10:00
#49
Posté 04 janvier 2010 - 09:52
Hardware consists of: Asus M4N78PRO, AMD Phenom2 955X4, 8 gigs of ram, GTX 285(nvidia),1.64 TB of HD space(partitioned into several drives), and finally 850W Zeus powersupply. I'm not going to go into all the parts and pieces unless specifically asked.
Oh and load times, if I'm starting from a fresh state......3-5 seconds at the most!
Nearly forgot the all important OS, Windows7/64bit.
Modifié par ohupthis, 04 janvier 2010 - 09:54 .
#50
Guest_werwulf222_*
Posté 06 juillet 2010 - 12:31
Guest_werwulf222_*
I lowered then adjusted the cpu voltage in my BIOS while monitoring the cores with Real Temp until the program was stable, and redid my NPC tactics in the book so they were more compatible with the game logic.
It seems on my system that the BIOS automatic voltage control setting wasn't reducing cpu voltage properly, as it should have, so voltage was too high and the cores were much hotter than they should have been or needed to be.
I don't recommend fiddling with your BIOS settings unless you know what you're doing, but these two changes worked for me.
Dragon Age runs as smooth as silk now on the highest settings, all the time. Sometimes cpu usage is still 100%, other times it's not. For my system, it seems to be the state of the NPC tactics that make the difference, but even at 100% usage now Real Temp reports temps no higher than 64 - 65 C for the cores while playing the game, and much lower temps for normal computing.
Hope this helps.
Modifié par werwulf222, 06 juillet 2010 - 12:41 .





Retour en haut







