Aller au contenu

Photo

Imagine this.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
6 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Anacronian Stryx

Anacronian Stryx
  • Members
  • 3 127 messages

Game 1.

 

Player and Co. arrives in Andromeda - sets up colonies chose where start mining and basically start up a tiny civilisation and of cause fight of the big bad enemy in that game.

 

I should note that you don't place structures and such in places the only thing that matters what planet/moon/asteroid you chose to build/settle on.

 

Also, the player leads by example, As the leader of these small settlements the rest of the populous will look to the player for guidance.

Instead of a renegade/paragon system the player have to live with that his/her example will be followed.

 

 

 

Game 2 takes place 2-300 years after Game 1 

 

You import a save from game 1 and has the choice of playing the granddaughter/grandson of the player character in game 1(or make story selections in the keep).

 

There will be settlements and mines on the same planets/moons/asteroids as you choose in Game 1 except they everything will have grown, new technologies will have developed - the settlements from Game 1 will have grown to cities and other cities will have sprung up - this will be the fist game where people will actually call Andromeda home.

 

And laws will have formed from the choices the player made in game 1 - of cause there will be a new baddy you will have to fight because computer game and all that.

 

 

 

Game 3 takes place another 2-300 years later.

 

You are now part of a thriving civilisation, Those places where you choose to settle in Game 1 is now very big cities and the Andromedians are the first human extra-galaxian civilisation with fleets of starships and all that.

 

Of cause, this is also where you meet and fight and even greater baddy than in the other games.

 

Instead of importing a character and the choices he/she made you import world states.. I find the idea exciting.


  • Cheviot aime ceci

#2
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 781 messages

That sounds like something that would work far better if it didn't depend on player choice and was instead decided by the devs.



#3
Anacronian Stryx

Anacronian Stryx
  • Members
  • 3 127 messages

That sounds like something that would work far better if it didn't depend on player choice and was instead decided by the devs.

Why?



#4
Cheviot

Cheviot
  • Members
  • 1 479 messages

Ooooh.  I'd play the hell out of these games.  I don't know if Mass Effect would be the right series for this, though, unless the story missions happen in places other than the ones you colonise.  Have you played Massive Chalice, by the way?  It's got a similarly large timescale.



#5
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 781 messages

Why?

 

I just think it'd be more solid if it was set in stone.



#6
Anacronian Stryx

Anacronian Stryx
  • Members
  • 3 127 messages

I just think it'd be more solid if it was set in stone.

Well I do like player choice and especially choice that can carry over - though of cause the devs would have in forming the choices.



#7
Arcian

Arcian
  • Members
  • 2 453 messages

Game 3 takes place another 2-300 years later.
 
You are now part of a thriving civilisation, Those places where you choose to settle in Game 1 is now very big cities and the Andromedians are the first human extra-galaxian civilisation with fleets of starships and all that.

"Extra-galactic." - Stannis