My husband is tall with very big feet. We're talking a size 15 (US). He wears jeans, heavy metal t-shirts and button down long sleeves that are left open. He wears socks with sandals, because they are one of the few shoes that fit him comfortably. He's on the overnight shift, and his work doesn't care either. He makes good money a year and is quite respected at his job as well.
I don't care what GQ says. My husband doesn't give a crap about pleasing anyone with his "fashion" and I love him for it. The most I make him "dress up" is to have him put on his nicest blue jeans, a black button-down that's, well, buttoned up and his Docs. That's it.
My #1 problem with GQ and all of that is the prices. Seriously, $50-$75 for a t-shirt because it has P. Diddy's name attached to it? They don't push the more reasonably priced Nikes and other shoes, they make sure the promote the highest dollar ones. $200 for a pair of tennis shoes? While they may have some common sense, I would recommend that folks find such basic tips elsewhere. Plus, dealing with 50+ pages out of a 75 page or so magazine with ads promising to bring out the "Real Man In You" by promoting the latest uber expensive fashionable bodywashes and shaving creams. That's really silly and it's just as bad as the 50 out of 75 pages of Cosmo being dedicated to the "Real Woman in You" with tons of makeup and hair product ads. 
I did not mean for my promotion of GQ to offend anyone as if I believe a magazine is the way to "make you a man" with said product, or can convince anyone to buy a $200 white Tshirt. In my original post I referenced GQ as a means of inspiration rather than a means to a slavish commercial lifestyle.
Good style comes from good design, and good design comes from the marriage of aesthetic concepts, construction, and fabrication. Some define design as the marriage of art and science, whether its clothes, buildings, products, and more. It's incredibly hard to construct a well-made anything, and the price goes higher when you use high-performance materials or innovative construction. And if you are not backed by a corporation conglomerate like H&M or Uniqlo, you can bet it's going to be a high price point, and therefore less accessible.
Nevertheless, It's unfortunate that the world of fashion has gotten so mixed up with the sorry world of consumerism, and that's why you have ridiculously priced plain t shirts and brand-whoring in general, and drowning artistic fashion editorials in millions of ads, but I guess that's how brands and publications make money. But at the end of the day, the most renowned publications for the most part are run by talented artists who promote talented designers (which is why I certainly wouldn't equate GQ with Cosmo, but more with Elle) and that is the only reason I'd promote any publication.
Now to be more on topic
Practical foot armour for players and Npcs. The option of both feminine and masculine, relating to "Gender" in the title.
There you go. Discuss 
If I can go back to my pet peeve about video game high heels...there are plenty of ways to make 'practical foot armor' more "feminine" than their masculine counterparts without adding some friggin 3" heel to them. Sneaker brands kind of make a good example out of this. They make gender differentiations with shape (like mens shoes tend to be chunkier) and have all sorts of interesting design details, while obviously staying uber practical....just stay away from heels 
Retour en haut
