Why are you telling me irrelevant things that I already know?
What is your problem? Did an ITer key your car or something?
Indoctrination Theory and Mass Effect Andromeda
Débuté par
sagman12
, juin 22 2015 09:55
#101
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 02:51
Monica21
-
- Members
- 5 603 messages
- GreatBlueHeron et Heimerdinger aiment ceci
Retour en haut
#102
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 02:52
The Heretic of Time
-
- Members
- 5 612 messages
No, the trailer does nothing to disprove the galactic annihilation if the ark left the Milky Way before the third game ended. It can all still be consistent with everyone's headcanon, as long as they left before they knew if the war would be won. I mean, in that case the folks in Andromeda would be the last members of their races, but they wouldn't have to know that in any event.
ME4 takes place hundreds of years after ME3. So I very much doubt "the ark" (what ark? and why have we never heard of it if it actually left before the ending of ME3 as you suggested?) left before the ending of ME3.
#103
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 02:52
The Heretic of Time
-
- Members
- 5 612 messages
Edit: Nevermind (this forum needs a "delete post" option).
- dfjdejulio aime ceci
#104
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 02:53
The Heretic of Time
-
- Members
- 5 612 messages
You argued people wanted IT because they wanted a happy ending, as if the game wasn't already chock full of happy endings. What a boring debate.
Hey if you want to think the current endings are happy ones than more power to you.
#105
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 02:53
Broganisity
-
- Members
- 5 336 messages
Oh Kee'lah, here we go. ..
- ChrisRudson aime ceci
#106
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 02:55
dfjdejulio
-
- Members
- 143 messages
ME4 takes place hundreds of years after ME3. So I very much doubt "the ark" (what ark? and why have we never heard of it if it actually left before the ending of ME3 as you suggested?) left before the ending of ME3.
I don't understand why you're drawing that conclusion. Without using mass relays, the trip from the Milky Way to Andromeda would take a long time. Leave during ME2, arrive (at least) 400 years after ME3. It's all consistent.
#107
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 02:56
Monica21
-
- Members
- 5 603 messages
Edit: Nevermind (this forum needs a "delete post" option).
Yeah, that's what I thought.
- GreatBlueHeron aime ceci
#108
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 02:56
Hadeedak
-
- Members
- 3 622 messages
What is your problem? Did an ITer key your car or something?
The forums were crazy for a while, with ITers (and other people) calling names and accusing people of being dumb for not seeing their perspective. It got really hostile, and vaguely annoying. Especially when I just wanted to talk about what Shepard's going to do now that she's all the Reapers. The endings were incredibly divisive in general, but something about IT just really whacked the hornet's nest.
#110
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 02:58
The Heretic of Time
-
- Members
- 5 612 messages
I don't understand why you're drawing that conclusion. Without using mass relays, the trip from the Milky Way to Andromeda would take a long time. Leave during ME2, arrive 400 years after ME3. It's all consistent.
It's not consistent.
Why have we never heard of this ark if all this was setup during the ME trilogy?
#111
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 02:59
Monica21
-
- Members
- 5 603 messages
The forums were crazy for a while, with ITers (and other people) calling names and accusing people of being dumb for not seeing their perspective. It got really hostile, and vaguely annoying. Especially when I just wanted to talk about what Shepard's going to do now that she's all the Reapers. The endings were incredibly divisive in general, but something about IT just really whacked the hornet's nest.
Well, it seems that nothing has changed then.
- GreatBlueHeron aime ceci
#112
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 02:59
Torgette
-
- Members
- 1 422 messages
Hey if you want to think the current endings are happy ones than more power to you.
Well, what would define an unhappy ME3 ending to you? To me it's ending cyclical genocide - my preference is destroy, it makes more sense (regardless of Shep's fate) to me, but I can't fault anybody for choosing the others in the end.
#113
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 03:01
The Heretic of Time
-
- Members
- 5 612 messages
Yeah, that's what I thought.
Euhm? I merely "deleted" my post because I mixed you up with another poster here. I can't help it that all your avatars and names look the same.
#114
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 03:01
shepskisaac
-
- Members
- 16 373 messages
People have been speculating about traveling to other galaxies since ME1. Ark Theory doesn't have claim over anything that involves going to a different galaxy.
Phealse. Without different galaxy there's no Ark Theory because the ark doesn't go anywhere and we're not side-stepping anything which is the point of it. Just accept the facts 
#115
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 03:02
The Heretic of Time
-
- Members
- 5 612 messages
Well, what would define an unhappy ME3 ending to you? To me it's ending cyclical genocide - my preference is destroy, it makes more sense (regardless of Shep's fate) to me, but I can't fault anybody for choosing the others in the end.
All of the current endings we have are "unhappy" to some degree.
#116
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 03:02
dfjdejulio
-
- Members
- 143 messages
It's not consistent.
Why have we never heard of this ark if all this was setup during the ME trilogy?
For the same reason that the Council and Alliance never heard of the Lazarus project, maybe? I am sure we didn't hear about every contingency plan that every single group in the galaxy was trying, especially longshot plans along the lines of "load two of every species on a boat and send it off without any plans for them to ever return or for us to ever hear from them again".
#117
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 03:03
Monica21
-
- Members
- 5 603 messages
Euhm? I merely "deleted" my post because I mixed you up with another poster here. I can't help it that all your avatars and names look the same.
Sorry to mess up your rage posting. (You do know you can multiquote, right?)
#118
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 03:04
Hanako Ikezawa
-
- Members
- 29 678 messages
Phealse. Without different galaxy there's no Ark Theory because the ark doesn't go anywhere and we're not side-stepping anything which is the point of it. Just accept the facts
No, without an Ark there is no Ark Theory. I've seen Ark Theory people talk about how it would work in the Milky Way. If Andromeda or some other galaxy was the key point, it would be named the "*insert galaxy here* Theory".
#119
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 03:08
shepskisaac
-
- Members
- 16 373 messages
No, without an Ark there is no Ark Theory. I've seen Ark Theory people talk about how it would work in the Milky Way. If Andromeda or some other galaxy was the key point, it would be named the "*insert galaxy here* Theory".
Just stop http://forum.bioware...212-ark-theory/
The concept of different galaxy has been key to the entire discussion. You simply have to accept current scoreboard: Ark Theory 1; IT 0
- teh DRUMPf!! aime ceci
#120
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 03:09
Lunch Box1912
-
- Members
- 3 156 messages
A volus came to Vega in a dream and told him he was to build an ark...
- dfjdejulio aime ceci
#121
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 03:10
Lunch Box1912
-
- Members
- 3 156 messages
Vega is your new playable character.. there is Vega, Fem Vega and Jersey Vega
- Jay P aime ceci
#122
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 03:10
Hanako Ikezawa
-
- Members
- 29 678 messages
Just stop http://forum.bioware...212-ark-theory/
The concept of different galaxy has been key to the entire discussion. You simply have to accept current scoreboard: Ark Theory 1; IT 0
No. The idea to go to other galaxies has been around on here for literally years before the Ark Theory came about. AT doesn't have claim on anything involving going to another galaxy. If anyone needs to stop, it's you.
Why do you think I care about scores?
#123
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 03:12
Augustei
-
- Members
- 3 923 messages
What is your problem? Did an ITer key your car or something?
So you're the Ones?!?!?!?!
Before I was just mad that they gave em free interwebs in the psych wards, but now......
- The Heretic of Time aime ceci
#124
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 03:12
dfjdejulio
-
- Members
- 143 messages
A volus came to Vega in a dream and told him he was to build a an ark...
Hey, if the original trilogy can have a Jesus allegory (martyr who dies to save humanity and gets resurrected, you know), then the next can have a Noah allegory. (Or, if the size of the group lead to Andromeda is big enough, maybe it's a Moses allegory? "I was given these instructions by a burning fractal manipulator", lead the tribes through the desolate resource-free space towards the promised land...)
EDIT: ...and if we get there and find golden tablets written in four different languages and a magic stone that lets us read them, then I quit.
Modifié par dfjdejulio, 23 juin 2015 - 03:13 .
- Lunch Box1912 aime ceci
#125
Posté 23 juin 2015 - 03:14
shepskisaac
-
- Members
- 16 373 messages
No. The idea to go to other galaxies has been around on here for literally years before the Ark Theory came about. AT doesn't have claim on anything involving going to another galaxy. If anyone needs to stop, it's you.
Why do you think I care about scores?
Yes it does and you will simply have to deal with it. The galaxy map in E3 2014 trailer started the entire discussion in particular context of ME4 and how may Bioware sidestep ME3 endings without doing a reboot/AU/retcon, while making a 'technical' sequel that's not actually a sequel. None of the discussion about different galaxies during ME1 or ME2 period had anything to do wth this context.
Why do you think I care about scores?
Cause you keep arguing IT is somehow better despite not getting a single prediciton right lol
- teh DRUMPf!! aime ceci
