27 réponses à ce sujet

[Scofield]

I like the idea, but they need to take it further, if the way you do things outrages a companion, the companion needs to walk away, forever, it is to damn easy in these games to keep a companion, an i dont mean a dialogue option for the pc, i mean the actually companion themselves telling you "hey this wasnt a good idea.....bye"

 

I preferred the KOTOR system of companions, some like you due to actions some dont, what i didnt like was the ones that didnt like you sticking around moaning

 

BioWare needs to make your actions have consequences, and the companions is the best place to start

[eyezonlyii]

I don't care about bonuses so much as Loyalty indicates there'd be stronger focus on character based stories, like ME2. That's all I really want. 

 

I don't care about their main plots that much... because they aren't that great anyways. Frankly, they f*cking suck.  It's just something I slog through. Characters, however, and general world building? This they do well.

I would rather the companions actually be part of the plot in some sense. That's what really turned me off about DA:I. Outside of Cassandra, really everyone else was superflorous, in that you could skip them, and not even know something was missing. It's also my main contention with ME:2, some of the people on the TIM's list really didn't need to be there, and some people on the list, needed more oomph for their presence.

[saladinbob]

"Be nice to me or we won't talk?"

 

That doesn't mean the concept was wrong, it means the writing was ****. The mechanic is a good one because it's more realistic. Accompanied with better writing and it would be the perfect solution.