I don't care for FB3 that much, but seriously, BioWare didn't choose to use it, they were mandated to use it by the company that writes their paychecks, EA.
@nobody
I for one think they have done well getting it to work with RPG systems, they had to spend more time developing engine systems which gave them less time to develop story and content. I am also not on the "BioWare Bad Game" bandwagon that seems to be so fashionable these days. Aside from the few issues that I ran into (some I fixed myself), I think the game is really good and am much happier with DA:I than I was with DA2 (and I also liked DA2). At the end of the day (or any day up to now), DA:I hasn't failed to entertain me (neither did DA2 despite all its flaws). We choose whether to be angry at toothpicks or accept the world and everything in it as it is, flawed, because nothing is perfect and nothing is as we expect.
I am not sorry, but I sick of this "it's not Bioware it's EA fault" BIOWARE IS EA. DA:I is full of bad design decision and not only on corporate level. I don't think suits forced make DA:I "open world" and fill it with fetch quest to sink time.
DA:O and all Witcher games are "perfect" I get everything what I expected and more. If you think DA:2 was bad. I think it was fine. I think DA:I was worse then DA:I. I don't care much about world and levels. Most important story, characters, and quests. I have more fun in my one cave in DA2 than all DA:I. I rather have one have filed with good story's than big empty world.






Retour en haut







