Wait, there's an explanation for the magic asari mind reading powers? Because I don't remember it. And let's not even forget the part on Noveria where Bioware forgets they're not writing Star Wars, and they talk about rachni being "sensitive to biotics".
I don't think ME3s ending - in isolation, i.e., ignoring everything else apart from that ending Catalyst sequence - is more nonsensical. It's a huge tone shift and introduces a bunch of stuff right out of nowhere. But stuff like making organic-synthetic hybrids using the powers of lasers isn't that out of left field for sci-fi.
Read the codex, or the mass effect wiki there is an explanation of sorts. Like I said, an explanation doesn't have to be a detailed scientifically plausible theory, just one believable enough within established lore, so you don't feel the need to question it and then apply real world scientific standards to it.
Lets face it how far would you get in a fantasy setting, like LOTR if , say, you question why Gandalf couldn't have just asked the Eagles to take Frodo and the Ring all the way to Mordor, for example, without some suspension of disbelief.
I guess the levels of nonsense people can take before their suspension of disbelief is broken varies alot from person to person. Mine is pretty high, but even I have limits, and once they are exceeded I critically examine everything. The ending of ME3 is where I reached my limit. Now even stuff I gave a pass to, and allowed through my critical filter, like the Conduit in ME1, start to ring plausibility bells.
So it's not about how nonsensical something is, relative to some other nonsense, but whether your critical mind gives it a pass, based on whether it looks believable within already established lore.





Retour en haut





