BioWare afraid of taking sides, and that I'm sure will have very bad impact on the ME:A.
probably
BioWare afraid of taking sides, and that I'm sure will have very bad impact on the ME:A.
probably
Uh, yeah, I'll be in Fallout land for most of November.
I think I'll wait on that. Being Bethesada, there probably won't be enough patches to make the game playable until spring at least ![]()
I think I'll wait on that. Being Bethesada, there probably won't be enough patches to make the game playable until spring at least
I think I'll wait on that. Being Bethesada, there probably won't be enough patches to make the game playable until spring at least
That's what I'm going to do for now on. Wish I did it with Dragon Age and Witcher 3.
Really didn't have any issues with Inquisition, but the XP bug for TW3 was brutal.
I feel sorry for those who ran into that bug. Thank god I didn't have any game-breaking issues during my first TW3 playthrough. The game actually ran great on my rig and I never encountered any noticeable bugs or glitches aside from a few hard crashes that forced me to hard-reset my PC (that was annoying but thank got the amount of times that happened can be counted on 1 hand).
Milky Way 100.000-120.000 LY diameter, 400.000.000 stars 18.2 years to cross with FTL
Our local group:
Large Magellanic Cloud 14.000LY diameter mass 20.000.000 solar mass, distance 162 980LY - 29,58 years to reach with FTL. Are reapers there?***
Small Magellanic Cloud 7.000 LY diameter, contains several hundred million stars, distance 200.000 LY -> 35 years to reach with FTL Are reapers there?**
Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy 10.000 LY diameter distance 50.000 LY 4.5 FTL years to reach. Are reapers there?***
Canis Major Overdensity irregular galaxy in our local group 1.000.000.000 stars 25.000LY from earth 42.000 LY from Milky Way core 4.5-7.6 years to reach with FTL. Are
reapers there?***
Canes Venatici I (dwarf galaxy) mass 27.000.000 solar mass, distance 720 000LY 131 FTL years to reach. Are reapers there?***
and 24 more galaxies in Milky Way sub group
Other big galaxies in local group:
Triangulum Galaxy M33 60.00 LY diameter 40.000.000 stars distance 2,380.000LY
Andromeda M31 190.000 LY diameter, 10.000.000.000.000 stars distance 2 538 000LY 463 years to reach with FTL yeah thats the target.
This is the only solution and we have to believe that reaper/ organics/synthetics conflict is limited to our galaxy only
*snip*
and this tiny scratch of the universe is part of Laniakea Supercluster 500.000.000LY in diameter containing 100.000 galaxiesOther question is: Why Bioware made 400.000.000 star system incapable of hosting next ME game? Ofc. Shepard was a Messiah lol nice one That what messiahs do ....**Nope Gothfater say: "There is nothing about the reapers that hints at curiosity or a desire to evangelize the preservation of life outside the milky way."
It would have been a bit more lore friendly/feasible to travel to the other galaxies in the local groups since the trip would be much shorter and the chances for successfully getting their would be much higher.
Andromeda has a better ring and more people heard of it. ME:Canis Major Overdensity sounds weird.
But yeah good question.
Andromeda has a better ring and more people heard of it. ME:Canis Major Overdensity sounds weird.
But yeah good question.
Easy answer: Common knowledge says that Andromeda is the nearest galaxy. Too bad it is only the nearest spiral galaxy. Many sci-fi writers made that mistake, making the name popular and now people "know" that it is the nearest galaxy in the same way they know that the pyramids in Egypt were built by slaves or that Marie Antoinette said "Let them have cake". (I shouldn't have to point this out but... yeah, all wrong)
I'm sure we could find some cool names in this list: https://en.wikipedia...earest_galaxies
Easy answer: Common knowledge says that Andromeda is the nearest galaxy. Too bad it is only the nearest spiral galaxy. Many sci-fi writers made that mistake, making the name popular and now people "know" that it is the nearest galaxy in the same way they know that the pyramids in Egypt were built by slaves or that Marie Antoinette said "Let them have cake". (I shouldn't have to point this out but... yeah, all wrong)
I'm sure we could find some cool names in this list: https://en.wikipedia...earest_galaxies
ME:Draco or even ME:Fornax sound good to me.
ME:Draco or even ME:Fornax sound good to me.
ME:Fornax! Perfect!
The new Fornax: With even more hot babes, pretty boys and exciting action!
Would be the perfect name for the ME "romance" simulator. ^^
ME:Fornax! Perfect!
The new Fornax: With even more hot babes, pretty boys and exciting action!
Would be the perfect name for the ME "romance" simulator. ^^
Yeah, but that would be a whole other kind of simulator. Not my scene, but to each his own...
Easy answer: Common knowledge says that Andromeda is the nearest galaxy. Too bad it is only the nearest spiral galaxy. Many sci-fi writers made that mistake, making the name popular and now people "know" that it is the nearest galaxy in the same way they know that the pyramids in Egypt were built by slaves or that Marie Antoinette said "Let them have cake". (I shouldn't have to point this out but... yeah, all wrong)
Oh I meant if the Reapers were there or rather if we get an answer about their status in Andromeda.
Oh I meant if the Reapers were there or rather if we get an answer about their status in Andromeda.
No and no. See? Easy.
pretty sure ME5 will have Milkyway crashing to Andromeda
pretty sure ME5 will have Milkyway crashing to Andromeda
it is more like that ME:A3 leave Andromeda completely inhabitable area due another Bioware messiah actions. ME3 bugged 400.000.000 star system. And they will be better than this.
PS Andromeda crash into Milky Way is inevitable. It will happen inn 3.700.000.000 years from now
I hope they just make Andromeda and then let the series die.
But EA loves milking the sh!t outta IPs, so there will probably be a 5th, 6th, 7th....
I hope they just make Andromeda and then let the series die.
But EA loves milking the sh!t outta IPs, so there will probably be a 5th, 6th, 7th....
They wouldn't make any new ME if they wanted to make just one new game based on Mass Effect universe... unless they wanna make a MMO, or just a heavily multiplayer-oriented game (i.e. a game that makes good money without need to have sequels, prequels, story or whatever).
Really didn't have any issues with Inquisition, but the XP bug for TW3 was brutal.
EDIT: I really don't care enough to pursue an argument over this.
Why not just wait for the game to come out, while giving insight but not overdoing it on what we would like to see in the game to the Game developers?
Does anyone have a general idea how the "switch" to Andromeda was recieved by the general public (I mean us)?Did the majority liked or disliked such move?
The general public doesn't seen to have a consensus one way or the other. Some like it, some don't, and some are indifferent.
Does anyone have a general idea how the "switch" to Andromeda was recieved by the general public (I mean us)?Did the majority liked or disliked such move?
I like the switch to Andromeda, why? Because this is a Sci-Fi story, they needed to move somewhere else as we have seen pretty much everything to see from the Milky Way throughout three games. Andromeda will have new species, new planets, new Nebulas and so much potential.