None. Until they decide Udina is the HUman Councilor
So which ending is Cannon?
#26
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 12:08
- Shermos aime ceci
#27
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 12:08
for me it would be destroy. but since the ark/ship most likely leaves before Shepard chooses, it wouldn't matter since we won't know
#29
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 12:46
Uhhh, none? They obviously moved the story to Andromeda to avoid the endings altogether. I mean, that was the entire point of it, most likely...its partially what allowed us to predict the move to Andromeda and the Ark concept year ago.
Most likely, the backstory will involve an ark that launched during the Reaper war as a fall back plan to preserve life, should the Crucible fail. All major conundrums of ME3 are therefore completely avoided.
Yes and no - I mean wouldn't the survivors want to know what had happened back home? (I would!)
Sure you can say that they can't launch such a mission right now because:
- the drive system that got them there is broken/destroyed (some think it' the mass effect core of Sovereign because no other ship can travel dark space (no planets to discharge the mass effect core into, so the crew would get fried!))
- they don't have the resources (the colony ship has been taken apart to build the new colony for example)
- etc.
Still, it's a pretty cheap co-out (I know they are doing it because the fans didn't like what they gave us in ME3 - but they could at least have the balls to admit they fucked up royally and change that...but at I said: That would take balls!) and it shouldn't work forever either, because at some point in time (if they don't want to discontinue the franchise!) the settlers would have the resources and some would want to go back (even after years!) because people are curious!
greetings LAX
#30
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 12:50
All of them.
#31
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 01:03
I would imagine only the Quarians would be included and not the geth. Because that would then have to force people's decisions to have spared the Geth in ME2 which... depending on when this ark set sail, either happened or didn't happen.
And the quarians are good at living entirely off what they can find, and in space. I'd imagine if there was some sort of joint venture between the species for this, the quarians would have been included. They are sort of the experts in this matter. The Batarians are all but extinct by the time ME2 ends, and who wants smelly vorcha on the ship. So races included I'd suspect would be Asari, Turian, Solarian and Human (council races) then quarians, volas and perhaps even some elcor.
But I guess all this is speculation at this point.
#32
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 01:39
And they will probably avoid the Geth and Quarian issue by including neither on the ark.
They both better be on that boat. If they're throwing away everything else, they better at least keep all the species.
- Shermos et Salfurium aiment ceci
#33
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 02:07
- DaemionMoadrin, Annos Basin et Tex aiment ceci
#34
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 02:13
Whichever one means no sequel ever being made, so probably refusal.
#35
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 02:16
They both better be on that boat. If they're throwing away everything else, they better at least keep all the species.
I'm sure one of the quarians will have a geth program on a thumb drive or something.
- Big Bad, CrutchCricket et Tex aiment ceci
#36
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 02:22
If it was control or synthesis, and it was possible to travel to Andromeda by ship, we would almost certainly see Reapers in Andromeda before any ark got there. Or they would turn around thanks to QECs (it's possible destroy would destroy these).
So only destroy or refuse make much sense ![]()
#37
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 02:23
If i HAD to choose it would be control, i like the idea of Shepard being a god...
- DaemionMoadrin aime ceci
#38
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 02:25
If it was control or synthesis, and it was possible to travel to Andromeda by ship, we would almost certainly see Reapers in Andromeda before any ark got there.
They can still discover wormholes, and/or the reapers could just not want to to travel to andromeda. It's easily possible that they only cared about the milky way....
#39
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 02:25
They both better be on that boat. If they're throwing away everything else, they better at least keep all the species.
If it is an Ark, I don't see how Quarians or Geth can if they want it to be convincing. The thought of either of them on an Ark is pretty far fetched in my opinion.
#40
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 02:29
They can still discover wormholes, and/or the reapers could just not want to to travel to andromeda. It's easily possible that they only cared about the milky way....
Yes, if they travel via a wormhole, and say that conventional travel between galaxies is impossible, that would be the best and most simple way to answer the question. And I guess I could buy the fact that reapers can but simply don't want to travel to Andromeda (although it sounds pretty unlikely to me) but under control or synthesis? No. If humans could travel to Andromeda in a few hundred years we would. Add in all the resources and longevity of reapers added to human curiosity and it is a certainty imo.
#41
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 02:36
They can still discover wormholes, and/or the reapers could just not want to to travel to andromeda. It's easily possible that they only cared about the milky way....
Also, more than likely the reapers just don't have the means to occupy multiple galaxies. After all, it turned out that they were being controlled by a central intelligence in the Milky Way, so unless some of them went rogue and went off to Andromeda to do whatever, there's not much reason for them to go elsewhere.
- Will-o'-wisp, LiL Reapur et Tex aiment ceci
#42
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 02:37
The quarians also have experience living entirely aboard ships. That could be really valuable to an expedition like the one people are theorizing about. So I could see some number of them involved. They could just say they were from an exiled population, or a part of the fleet that didn't go along with the rest to retake Rannoch. There wouldn't even have to be that many of them for a sustainable population if their genetics are anything like humans'.
As much as I love the geth, I doubt they'll show up (though I really hope they do in a non-villainous role). That said, if they're not going to include the geth, they shouldn't include the quarians, either.
#43
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 02:42
As much as I love the geth, I doubt they'll show up (though I really hope they do in a non-villainous role). That said, if they're not going to include the geth, they shouldn't include the quarians, either.
Eh, I lean much less on any prospect of the geth reappearing, because they're basically a race whose primary function was to provide something to shoot at, same as the rachni.
- Tex aime ceci
#44
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 02:48
Destroy.
Shepard has to use the Carnifex hand-cannon to activate the Crucible in that scenario.
#45
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 02:50
Only one that leaves room for a sequel is high EMS destroy. In all the others, humanity is either extinct or defended by an armada of tamed Reapers. Either way, there's no need for people like Shepard anymore.
I'd dispute that. Paragon or Neutral Control also leaves room for another game in the Milky Way. The CataShep says pretty directly that it doesn't intend to interfere in the ordinary activity of the galaxy, only in cases of a massive war or to prevent extinction. There's still plenty of room for conflict and a good story focused on exploration.
The only main ending which is hard to write a new story for is Synthesis. And Reject of course, but that's basically a "Failure. Try Again" ending.
- LiL Reapur et Annos Basin aiment ceci
#46
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 02:55
Only one that leaves room for a sequel is high EMS destroy. In all the others, humanity is either extinct or defended by an armada of tamed Reapers. Either way, there's no need for people like Shepard anymore.
I still do not understand why people think shepard is alive even after the high ems destroy..he is still clearly on Earth...thus he never activated the crucible...The catalyst was made up...everyone dies at the end...regardless of which color you pick.
#47
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 03:04
Yes and no - I mean wouldn't the survivors want to know what had happened back home? (I would!)
Sure you can say that they can't launch such a mission right now because:
- the drive system that got them there is broken/destroyed (some think it' the mass effect core of Sovereign because no other ship can travel dark space (no planets to discharge the mass effect core into, so the crew would get fried!))
- they don't have the resources (the colony ship has been taken apart to build the new colony for example)
- etc.
Still, it's a pretty cheap co-out (I know they are doing it because the fans didn't like what they gave us in ME3 - but they could at least have the balls to admit they fucked up royally and change that...but at I said: That would take balls!) and it shouldn't work forever either, because at some point in time (if they don't want to discontinue the franchise!) the settlers would have the resources and some would want to go back (even after years!) because people are curious!
greetings LAX
I completely agree about it being a cop-out. Bioware should look the endings square in the face and deal with them properly. We shouldn't need to completely abandon a rich and huge setting because people didn't like them. That's what it comes down to basically, and it's silly.
"https://twitter.com/...474505576222720
For the goddess, look at the 3rd comment."
We take choice very seriously lol. Since when Mike? He should at least admit the trilogy didn't take choice very seriously at all. Why take it seriously with the ending all of a sudden? Be bold Bioware. You can afford to take the risk.
#48
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 03:06
https://twitter.com/...474505576222720
For the goddess, look at the 3rd comment.
Because people ignored your comment...
Jonathan Warner @Bio_Warner 2. März
@SomeStrangeFX @bioware @masseffect @GambleMike The next ME is a great place to jump into the series. No need to worry about saves.
Michael Gamble @GambleMike 2. März
@SomeStrangeFX @Bio_Warner @bioware @masseffect There is no canon ending to ME3. Player choice is something we take very seriously.
Can we please stop useless speculations about things that have been decided already? ****** please?
- Oldren Shepard et Tex aiment ceci
#49
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 03:11
The ending that has this song for the credits.
#50
Posté 06 juillet 2015 - 03:12
And the devs also said they were not going to change the ending... and yet then went on and made the extended cut.
Either way, I am very curious to see how they write this all in.





Retour en haut






