Spoils of the Qunari? Lol
#26
Posté 07 juillet 2015 - 06:56
#27
Posté 07 juillet 2015 - 07:46
You do realize it's not about the money right? It's the methods they use to milk people. This stuff are assets used in the upcoming story dlc. They are double dipping instead of already including it as part of the story dlc. It's insulting to me as a fan of bioware and frankly it's bad for gaming. They have to have more respect for their consumers. This process of always having their hands in our pockets trying to squeeze the last dollar out of us. I don't like it. I'll gladly buy their story based dlcs, I don't mind spending money on additional content so long as it's done respectfully.Poeple come on, crying about dlc item packs really? It wont be free, if it should have been part of the game is discussable, It wont stop ... Instead of being happy you can get something new into the game, you cry ... would you rather wait half a year+ and get nothing? ... I am actually happy we got another pack I kinda like Qunari so cool .. the wait will be better now atleast for me .. Is really 5 euro that of a problem come on .. You are just being salty over nothing .. if u dont want it dont buy it period .. being angry wont change anything
- Melcolloien, Callidus Thorn, Meredydd et 9 autres aiment ceci
#29
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 03:23
Bioware has new engine, is focusing on ME:A and under EA policy ... what can i say
Those are such a 3 really lame excuses.
- New engine? well, they should have mastered it before launching the game.
- Bioware is now focusing on ME:A? Great!!! So let's keep buying DAI bullsh*t because they are not focusing on DAI.
- Oh, poor Bioware, it's always EA's fault.
- HydroFlame20, Lord Bolton et the Dame aiment ceci
#30
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 03:24
Those are such a 3 really lame excuses.
- New engine? well, they should have mastered it before launching the game.
- Bioware is now focusing on ME:A? Great!!! So let's keep butinng bullsh*t because they are not focusing on the DAI.
- Oh, poor Bioware, it's always EA's fault.
DICE can't even handle their own engine, and they created it. I'm far from a Bioware apologist, but I don't blame them for their lack of understanding of Frostbite.
#31
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 11:21
The fact that there is no modding support has nothing to do with those "horse armor" style DLC's.
Right?...
I could mention again CD Project Red and the staggering difference in attitude towards their consumers between them and Bioware,
but this horse is deader than dead.
So yay, another money grab.
- Mir Aven, PlasmaCheese et turuzzusapatuttu aiment ceci
#32
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 12:01
Those are such a 3 really lame excuses.
- New engine? well, they should have mastered it before launching the game.
- Bioware is now focusing on ME:A? Great!!! So let's keep buying DAI bullsh*t because they are not focusing on DAI.
- Oh, poor Bioware, it's always EA's fault.
What the **** dude, excuses sure, I would love to see you try making game of their size ... Go achieve what they did, if u dont like this game/games just leave, dont buy them and stop complaining oh my god i am so full of guys like u, wtf some things were the best but nobody forced u to buy this game of try it out, it was your decision and if u come up with an argument about how u want these games to be cool and best .. well you arent helping by throwing **** around u like a little monkey are you? Go create it on your own or give a good feedback (good doesnt mean full of positives)
#33
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 12:09
Bioware has new engine, is focusing on ME:A and under EA policy ... what can i say
1- A new engine is no excuse for releasing overpriced cosmetic content instead of story-based DLC.
2- A completely separate studio is making Andromeda so this excuse is entirely stupid.
3- Origins DLC was made after EA bought BioWare.
Lame, faulty excuses all.
What the **** dude, excuses sure, I would love to see you try making game of their size ... Go achieve what they did, if u dont like this game/games just leave,
This is the dumbest argument you can make. If someone criticizes a movie do you tell them to make a better movie? If someone says a book sucks do you tell them to write a better book?
- Melcolloien, Mir Aven, TheBlackAdder13 et 1 autre aiment ceci
#34
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 12:13
1- A new engine is no excuse for releasing overpriced cosmetic content instead of story-based DLC.
2- A completely separate studio is making Andromeda so this excuse is entirely stupid.
3- Origins DLC was made after EA bought BioWare.
Lame, faulty excuses all.
This is the dumbest argument you can make. If someone criticizes a movie do you tell them to make a better movie? If someone says a book sucks do you tell them to write a better book?
Well this game doesnt suck since it won many awards, got amazing rating and is fun to play, yet there are many people just salty over BioWare that htey suck because they dont give u more fast enough what the **** is that attitude really
#35
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 12:34
Well this game doesnt suck since it won many awards, got amazing rating and is fun to play, yet there are many people just salty over BioWare that htey suck because they dont give u more fast enough what the **** is that attitude really
DAI received GOTY in a particularly shitty year for gaming, without having any real competitors.
Awards and unrealistically high ratings from a clique that its members take turns congratulating each other, are not really impressive.
- mredders91 aime ceci
#36
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 01:04
The fact that there is no modding support has nothing to do with those "horse armor" style DLC's.
Right?...
I could mention again CD Project Red and the staggering difference in attitude towards their consumers between them and Bioware,
but this horse is deader than dead.
So yay, another money grab.
So much this.
DAI received GOTY in a particularly shitty year for gaming, without having any real competitors.
Awards and unrealistically high ratings from a clique that its members take turns congratulating each other, are not really impressive.
If only CDPR had released TW3 a few months earlier...
- Laughing_Man aime ceci
#37
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 01:23
The fact that there is no modding support has nothing to do with those "horse armor" style DLC's.
Right?...
I could mention again CD Project Red and the staggering difference in attitude towards their consumers between them and Bioware,
but this horse is deader than dead.
So yay, another money grab.
Agreed. But I'll go ahead and beat that dead horse anyway. The fact that I purchased the expansion pass for TW3 for $25 and all the alternate outfits, horse armor, minor quests, etc. for free, is a much better deal than what $25 gets you for DAI: Jaws of Hakkon and two armor dlcs.
- Laughing_Man et Isaidlunch aiment ceci
#38
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 01:28
Well this game doesnt suck since it won many awards, got amazing rating and is fun to play, yet there are many people just salty over BioWare that htey suck because they dont give u more fast enough what the **** is that attitude really
What does any of this gibberish have to do with what I posted?
- mrjack aime ceci
#39
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 06:03
Just an FYI, you don't have to buy it. You should be thankful that this is how Bioware and EA are trying to milk us for money, some games and their dlc is just outrageous.
Not saying that this makes everything okay, blatant cash grabs are bad, but at least recognize that it could be a hell of a lot worse and that these items pack are completely optional.
- alschemid et cckat26 aiment ceci
#40
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 06:06
I like DA:I
I like the look of the Qunari spoils DLC
I want DA to continue
sign me up for 2 n to hell what anyone on these boards think
- Exile Isan et Sime aiment ceci
#41
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 06:53
The fact that there is no modding support has nothing to do with those "horse armor" style DLC's.
Right?...
I could mention again CD Project Red and the staggering difference in attitude towards their consumers between them and Bioware,
but this horse is deader than dead.
So yay, another money grab.
People who cite cd projekt red as if they're the such kind hearted individuals tend to forget two things.
1. Their development is subsidized by their government. Meaning, no matter how many copies they sell they still get paid and there is less risk involved on the developers part. Pretty easy to flaunt yourself as the peoples champ when in reality sales numbers don't influence your payday at all.
2. This "free" dlc program is nothing more than held back content that is slowly released. You really think it takes them 1 week to create these dlcs? And yet every week they're coming out with new ones. These expansions were already completed long ago alongside development of the vanilla game. Your average sheeple is either completely ignorant or in denial of this. Fact of the matter is this is a common practice in the industry, we are seeing bioware do it themselves with these spoils packs. Only difference is bioware doesn't have a subsidized development, cdpr does. So bioware has to put a price tag on it to get paid while cdpr does not. The currency cdpr is accepting since it's development is subsidized is brownie points from gamers who will go to every corner of the earth singing their praises as if cdpr is giving them free content out of the kindness of their hearts.
I'm in no way defending biowares practices, but to suggest cdpr is any different is ludicrous.
- Exile Isan, Danny Boy 7, Sime et 2 autres aiment ceci
#42
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 07:00
People who cite cd projekt red as if they're the such kind hearted individuals tend to forget two things.
1. Their development is subsidized by their government. Meaning, no matter how many copies they sell they still get paid and there is less risk involved on the developers part. Pretty easy to flaunt yourself as the peoples champ when in reality sales numbers don't influence your payday at all.
2. This "free" dlc program is nothing more than held back content that is slowly released. You really think it takes them 1 week to create these dlcs? And yet every week they're coming out with new ones. These expansions were already completed long ago alongside development of the vanilla game. Your average sheeple is either completely ignorant or in denial of this. Fact of the matter is this is a common practice in the industry, we are seeing bioware do it themselves with these spoils packs. Only difference is bioware doesn't have a subsidized development, cdpr does. So bioware has to put a price tag on it to get paid while cdpr does not. The currency cdpr is accepting since it's development is subsidized is brownie points from gamers who will go to every corner of the earth singing their praises as if cdpr is giving them free content out of the kindness of their hearts.
I'm in no way defending biowares practices, but to suggest cdpr is any different is ludicrous.
Any proof for anything you just wrote?
- Super Drone aime ceci
#43
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 08:23
- zambingo et PrayingMantis aiment ceci
#44
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 08:49
- Bethgael aime ceci
#45
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 08:53
Everyone slow down. Spoils of the Avvar actually isn't ripped from JoH. It's ripped from the base game! I just went back to the Fallow Mire and noticed that the Avvar wear those outfits in there too. In other words, they're taking armour from the base game that they chose not to make craftable, and are selling it as DLC. Come on Bioware. Ugh.
- FALCONGTX, Bethgael, Lord Bolton et 1 autre aiment ceci
#46
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 09:11
- NRieh aime ceci
#47
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 09:19
Work does have to be done to change armour from single race, non-craftable stuff, to making it wearable by all races and craftable. It's not just a case of flicking a switch and calling it DLC.
Kind of* to the former, but I seriously doubt it's hard to make one into a schematic. Besides, it's irrelevant really. They're still selling base-game armours.
*Kind of because they actually did a terrible job of making it available on all races. Take a look at the armour in Spoils of the Avvar (I haven't seen Qunari). It totally distorts anyone but a human and makes the Qunari look mishapen and small, and the elves look fat and disproportional. That might even be because they just took the human form and stretched it instead of doing it properly. Either way, it's clear that wasn't a huge hurdle for them. If they expect me to pay for something (that I shouldn't have to anyway) I expect it to be of high quality.
Edit: Even the one new armour in JoH, the only non-race specific one besides the defaults, distorts ALL races. I refuse to wear it even on my human (even though I think it looks cool) because it totally changes her body. She looks like a qunari with a human head.
#48
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 09:20
Any proof for anything you just wrote?
No I just pulled all of that from my ass.
If you want to verify that, you can do so on your own. It's not my responsibility to prove this to you. I'm simply informing people who are criminally misinformed in their praise of CDPR. Your belief or misbelief in what I wrote has no effect on the reality of the situation.
- DemonInTheAlly aime ceci
#49
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 09:59
No I just pulled all of that from my ass.
If you want to verify that, you can do so on your own. It's not my responsibility to prove this to you. I'm simply informing people who are criminally misinformed in their praise of CDPR. Your belief or misbelief in what I wrote has no effect on the reality of the situation.
So you got caught lying and this lame comeback is all you could do ? LMAO
- Isaidlunch aime ceci
#50
Posté 08 juillet 2015 - 10:11
If you want to verify that, you can do so on your own. It's not my responsibility to prove this to you.
Well, um, no that's not how it works - if you make a claim, you have to back it up in order to be taken seriously. It's a standard courtesy in any sort of half-decent discussion.
- c0bra951 aime ceci





Retour en haut







