Ok I have heard it all i think about how the leader board is a fail..... but I was talking with some friends and some pugs and we came up with an interesting ideal, have the leader boards based only off of promotions... this will clear out the leader board of inactive and allow some hopefully new and very active players to climb.
what do you all think?
what are your ideals for leader board changes and expansions?
do you think it will add another fun and interesting dynamic to DAMP?
Ok I have heard it all i think about how the leader board is a fail..... but I was talking with some friends and some pugs and we came up with an interesting ideal, have the leader boards based only off of promotions... this will clear out the leader board of inactive and allow some hopefully new and very active players to climb.
what do you all think?
what are your ideals for leader board changes and expansions?
do you think it will add another fun and interesting dynamic to DAMP?
i also wish it was done away with. people take it too seriously.
Well they could add more leaderboard options:
1) Most kills total
2) Most kills this week
3) Most promotions total
3) Most gold medals this week
4) Most treasure room guardians killed this this week
5) Most successful runs this this week
6) Ect..
Then new players actually get a shot at the leaderboard for a week. Thats called motivation instead of a leaderboard they can NEVER get on. (Too little too late)
Yallegro thinks this is a daft idea
Not many people on the leaderboard are inactive and those that are sink fast enough
The leaderboard isn't a terribly exciting gimmic but reducing it to the most active at any given time seems to hollow it out even more
As for expansions I think this is a dead alley, unless they started counting victories in some kind "challenge tournament"
With impressive challenges,
ffs
I would delete leader boards as a whole. Waste of memory and server space.
This
This... might be entertaining. Only time will tell.
It would make all of BW's challenges pointless. As pointed out above, those who are inactive drop rapidly enough anyway. And if they promote that much, these players you're talking about should be getting some challenges done along the way too. Or are they just always playing one kit? I'm not sure I understand the rationale.
I would get rid of it entirely, though.
Well they could add more leaderboard options:
1) Most kills total
2) Most kills this week
3) Most promotions total
3) Most gold medals this week
4) Most treasure room guardians killed this this week
5) Most successful runs this this week
6) Ect..
Then new players actually get a shot at the leaderboard for a week. Thats called motivation instead of a leaderboard they can NEVER get on. (Too little too late)
I second, third, and or fourth which ever number we are on that the leader boards need to go. With the current exp glitch the leader board is a sham anyway. Instead, I would have prestige based rewards so the weeklys are still relevant and have matchmaking try to match players that are around the same prestige level if possible.
Well they could add more leaderboard options:
1) Most kills total
2) Most kills this week
3) Most promotions total
3) Most gold medals this week
4) Most treasure room guardians killed this this week
5) Most successful runs this this week
6) Ect..
Then new players actually get a shot at the leaderboard for a week. Thats called motivation instead of a leaderboard they can NEVER get on. (Too little too late)
I really like that ideal man 
weekly leader boards are cool as well and maybe give out prizes for being on top like gold or a box or somthing
i also wish it was done away with. people take it too seriously.
This
less e-peen, bw pls
The in game score board and the actual leader board for challenge points is so much worse in damp than it was in me3mp. Not sure why they scaled it back so much.
I would delete leader boards as a whole. Waste of memory and server space.
/thread
This too is based on who plays the most during a given period of time. Current leaderboard basically accomplishes the same thing. People who ask for the Leaderboard to be removed are also being foolish because what would a MP board have if not some epeen board?Well they could add more leaderboard options:
1) Most kills total
2) Most kills this week
3) Most promotions total
3) Most gold medals this week
4) Most treasure room guardians killed this this week
5) Most successful runs this this week
6) Ect..
Then new players actually get a shot at the leaderboard for a week. Thats called motivation instead of a leaderboard they can NEVER get on. (Too little too late)
agreed it would take a work out form elsewhereMuch prefer they allocate resources to other areas.
They could allocate some time to get rid of the leader boards.
Well, if nobody's going to Thundadumb anyone, then I'll take my toe back out of the pool and go... 
It should be a little more like MEMP,so you can see where you are at on a bigger scale,and not just the top 100.
yeah I have to agree about this ^^
This too is based on who plays the most during a given period of time. Current leaderboard basically accomplishes the same thing. People who ask for the Leaderboard to be removed are also being foolish because what would a MP board have if not some epeen board?
I would like to see some that people take on as challenges such top 10 of
1. Fastest run clearing all treasure (or not) in each mode routine/threatening/perilous/NM/HB
2. Most Experience generated from the runs in Tevinter/Elven/Orlais/FC Drag/FC no Boss in each mode
3. Fastest Solo Run by Character in each mode
4. Highest Kill Streaks in each mode (to get some competitive blood going)
5. Most Support XP generated Players
Basic Rules:
a. At the end of all runs all players must be standing to have run count
b. Divide by category
b1. Recruit - under 10 Total Promotions
b2. Veterans - Under 150 Total Promotions
b3. Hardcore - Under 300 Total Promotions
b4. Lifers - Over 300 Total promotions
You could even extend out to most poison kills/ most chests opened/most enemies killed etc if the games collects these data. These can be won by players without having to be able to play x-amount during y-period of time.
its not a bad ideal, to have this added into the mix of things, thanks for contributing ^^ I feel like the people downing the leader board are the ones expressing they are casual players .... but the leader board is not for the casual and if you are casual you should maybe not care.......
its not a bad ideal, to have this added into the mix of things, thanks for contributing ^^ I feel like the people downing the leader board are the ones expressing they are casual players .... but the leader board is not for the casual and if you are casual you should maybe not care.......
Oh come now, let's not invalidate a person's opinion just because they are not on the leader board.
Retour en haut
