187 réponses à ce sujet

[abisha]

i wonder do anyone find the (side line story) of Dragon age 3 a little immature?

not talking about main story because their is nothing Dragon age 3 delivers other then I am evil i destroy world blah blah blah.

 

when i was playing wither 3 i found the story's (the side line quests)

I feel like the story's feelt a lot more mature and realistic

for instance the Baron quest with the crones *really impressive work*

not only their appearance because i was expecting some smoking hot woman.

but their motives and overall lore about them.

 

if Bioware gonna make a other ME or DA, please learn from other company's that story's can be a little more mature.

 

my 2 cents.

[Al Foley]

The Baron story was a main quest.  

 

DA Is story was a lot more then just 'blah blah I destroy the world'.  

 

As far as the side stories are concerned, I think DA Is stories are a lot more mature then most people give it credit for.  Just look at all the death, misery, destruction, and other mature content matter out there.  As far as more realistic...who knows?

[Elhanan]

Sorry; prefer my criticism to be a lot more mature and realistic; also helps to be a bit more correct, esp when it is ref. proper writing. Blah, blah, blah....

[Donk]

Sorry; prefer my criticism to be a lot more mature and realistic; also helps to be a bit more correct, esp when it is ref. proper writing. Blah, blah, blah....

English might not be the OP's first language.

@ Op: I think the word you are looking for is "dark". TW3 has darker and grittier content, without a doubt.

DAI has its own but it isn't so in your face, so to speak.

Dark content doesn't necessarily equate to "mature" or a better story either. Some people consider the use of dark content in a game to cause controversy and mask the actual level of how good a story is, so a cop-out.

Having said that, I personally prefer TW3 when it comes to story and gameplay. But on a DAI forum people are sick of seeing these comparison threads as most of them are DA fans and consider it to be the superior game.

There is a thread for this in Feedback.

[Zered]

I know this thread will not end well

[xPez]

I prefer the big bad in TW3 to Coryfish.

 

 

EDIT: I did write more but... I don't think this thread is going anywhere good.

[abisha]

I know this thread will not end well

 

why not i played DA:I for 270 hours. and have great game experience from it, tho was expecting more in line of DA:O (a fine game)

kind of waiting for more DLC and that they become cheaper (find them way to expensive for the content) before i start playing a other DA:I game.

 

I just feel like Bioware makes unnecessary +12 video game when 18+ was expected. to boost (virtual sales).

[Donk]

If it was 12 plus there wouldn't be Boobs.

[Zered]

I prefer the big bad in TW3 to Coryfish.

 

 

EDIT: I did write more but... I don't think this thread is going anywhere good.

 

To be fair both big bads were meh in Witcher and Da:I. The stories behind them are all fine and interesting but the way they are delivered is not interesting.

[correctamundo]

Wow! Another one. I think it deserves a drink

[Shechinah]

for instance the Baron quest with the crones *really impressive work*

not only their appearance because i was expecting some smoking hot woman.

but their motives and overall lore about them.

You were expecting creatures called crones to be "some smoking hot woman"?

 

[Donk]

You were expecting creatures called crones to be "some smoking hot woman"?

To be fair, one is a dead ringer for Tali.. And you know how err.. Desired she is in these parts, that the mere mention of "sweat" sets people off.

[BraveVesperia]

Yay, another thread about The Witcher 3.

[Orian Tabris]

[abisha]

You were expecting creatures called crones to be "some smoking hot woman"?

 

well they represented the painting that's waved with hair.

so natural people expecting something other then those thing's.

[Orian Tabris]

well they represented the painting that's waved with hair.

so natural people expecting something other then those thing's.

 

I don't know what the crones in TW3 look like, but crones are supposed to be old women with magical powers, usually with nasty streaks. So naturally, most people would assume that they are ugly, evil hags.

[Xetykins]

You're in bsn, ofc DAI has better story!

[zestalyn]

saying DAI is only about saving the world is like saying TW3 is just about some dude looking for his daughter

[Apollexander]

Can I hear the companions bantering and telling their stories while exploring in TW?

I haven't played TW3 but I have heard that its main story line is like:

Looking for Ciri. Then you have to go and find the missing person A, B, C again and again, before anyone could give you information.

[correctamundo]

Can I hear the companions bantering and telling their stories while exploring in TW?
I haven't played TW3 but I have heard that its main story line is like:
Looking for Ciri. Then you have to go and find the missing person A, B, C again and again, before anyone could give you information.

No you can't and yes, something like that ;-)

[trevelyan_shep]

Stop with these threads jfc.

[Big I]

They're both great games and I liked them both. I did feel that the main plot of Witcher 3 was more interesting because it was more personal.

 

 

In Inquisition I chose not to engage in the "faith" aspect of the story. I was sceptical about being the Herald, and about Andraste's divinity in general. That was fine and I enjoyed it, but it also meant that whenever any character went on about the Maker and destiny and the Chantry being this important institution I was uninterested and disengaged. I was a little disappointed that no matter what actions I took in game, my PC was regarded as a religious icon and the Inquisition as a religious organisation. I'm just here to save the world, not solve your metaphysical crisis.

 

 

The Witcher 3 was a familiar story about family and one man against the world. Seeing Geralt get emotional about/with Ciri was great. I loved even potenially antagonistic characters like Djikstra  and Philipa, and the relationship between Geralt and Ciri, Yennefer, etc. At the same time it's a little weird with world building and lore. I'm not that well versed on the Witcher setting, but I know Geralt fought in at least one war against Nilgaard, and yet working with them and possibly securing their victory over the Nordlings is dealt with without mentioning that. And if you played through Iorveth's path in TW2 and were expecting to see the impacts of that in TW3, sorry but not happening.

 

 

So I liked the main plot of TW3 better because the story of one man fighting for his family resonated with me more than Inquisition's story about a reluctant prophet, but thought Inquisition was better with world building and respecting previous entries in the franchise.

[Linkenski]

DA:I's story was completely superficial. I wasn't completely overhwlemed by Witcher 3's plot but it had so many small good individual moments that has stuck with me, enough that I think DA:I looks silly in comparison.

 

DA:I had a cringe-worthy Disney-esque singing scene that didn't make any sense at face-value (at least not in how everyone just agrees to sing out of nowhere and then walk away like "uh, i guess that was it" afterwards). Witcher 3 had a genuinely chilling bard-scene that made me shut up and sink a lump in my throat because of how reflective it was, the camera work showing just the right things and because it didn't overdo it.

 

I still like DA:I for having a customizable character but I'm never replaying it again at this point.

[Afro_Explosion]

Dai story suffered because Bioware made huge zones with bs fetch quests with no cutscenes, and no motivation. It made a lot of the story seem disjointed and distant. Still loved the game to death.

[9TailsFox]

If it was 12 plus there wouldn't be Boobs.

Boobs is just PG-13.