Aller au contenu

Photo

Well, Sebastian went off the deep end


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
312 réponses à ce sujet

#176
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

He may be recognized that Meredith was insane, that's why he accepted Kirkwall's mages, but the gross of the rebellion is lead by Fiona, he maybe ignores that she is his mother, but pretty sure he knows that she was one of Duncan's and Maric's best friends, have the mages been led by someone else, or have Alistair known she was his mother, things would be different.


Yeah it'd be worse likely.

His mother is not only responsible for the displacement of the lord of one of his provinces but also let a Magister swoop down and plot his evil **** with impunity.

She's basically sold out Fereldan's hinterlands for the sake of her crumbling rebellion.

So I'd expect... Finding out his mother was responsible would be the worst that could happen.
  • Deztyn aime ceci

#177
MadMadCarl

MadMadCarl
  • Members
  • 58 messages

Yeah it'd be worse likely.

His mother is not only responsible for the displacement of the lord of one of his provinces but also let a Magister swoop down and plot his evil **** with impunity.

She's basically sold out Fereldan's hinterlands for the sake of her crumbling rebellion.

So I'd expect... Finding out his mother was responsible would be the worst that could happen.

Worse because he likely wouldn't exiled her from ferelden you say? not an expert, but i remember that alexius used a time magic cheat and he spread fear on the low ranks, fiona disliked the idea of becoming a tevinter and serving and magister, if she took that chance, was because of fear.



#178
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

Worse because he likely wouldn't exiled her from ferelden you say? not an expert, but i remember that alexius used a time magic cheat and he spread fear on the low ranks, fiona disliked the idea of becoming a tevinter and serving and magister, if she took that chance, was because of fear.

 

Cause and effect are likely irrelevant and justly so.

 

Fear doesn't justify what she did anymore then greed or revenge or whatever half assed excuse that can be applied here does.

 

She made a choice: The consequences of that action are her's to bear.

 

And no he'd still probably boot her ass out of Fereldan only it would be dramatic and angsty...honestly surprised Bioware didn't go that route.



#179
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 585 messages
 

If he didn't exile her, Ferelden would become the laughing stock of Thedas and the nobles would lose confidence in their king.

 


  • Deztyn aime ceci

#180
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

He may be recognized that Meredith was insane, that's why he accepted Kirkwall's mages, but the gross of the rebellion is lead by Fiona, he maybe ignores that she is his mother, but pretty sure he knows that she was one of Duncan's and Maric's best friends, have the mages been led by someone else, or have Alistair known she was his mother, things would be different.

Im not sure if you are talking about decision to provide shelter for mages or decision to kick out fiona.

If first possible but unlikely considering his previous decisions ,there is no reason why person that hated mages would give them shelter.

 

In fact it is pretty clear that alistair not only doesn't hate mages is to certain degree "pro-mage" one of examples when he says that he doesn't agree with chantry on mages , will disagree with you on killing mages in broken circle ,he is friendly with wynne and won't be happy if you kill connor who was not only mage but also an abomnation ,and then we have above.

 

I hope guy learned his lesson after mages screwd him over and won't be naive on matters concerning mages.



#181
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

 

 

If he didn't exile her, Ferelden would become the laughing stock of Thedas and the nobles would lose confidence on their king.

 

 

Quite.

 

Harboring the dissidents who not only betrayed the Monarchy who protected them but also aligned with a hostile foreign power in a attempt at invasion...yeah...

 

Orlais would probably never stop writing comedies about that one.



#182
Andromelek

Andromelek
  • Members
  • 1 161 messages

Im not sure if you are talking about decision to provide shelter for mages or decision to kick out fiona.
If first possible but unlikely considering his previous decisions ,there is no reason why person that hated mages would give them shelter.
 
In fact it is pretty clear that alistair not only doesn't hate mages is to certain degree "pro-mage" one of examples when he says that he doesn't agree with chantry on mages , will disagree with you on killing mages in broken circle ,he is friendly with wynne and won't be happy if you kill connor who was not only mage but also an abomnation ,and then we have above.
 
I hope guy learned his lesson after mages screwd him over and won't be naive on matters concerning mages.


Fine, I take the "hate mages" argument back, still, he is ignorant, incompetent, dumb and really, really peevish, and I still seeing wrong what he did to Yavana, having a dubious morality and goal maybe make her unable to be seen as innocent, but that definitely doesn't make her guilty or evil either, It's just like execute someone with a lack of proofs.

#183
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

Fine, I take the "hate mages" argument back, still, he is ignorant, incompetent, dumb and really, really peevish, and I still seeing wrong what he did to Yavana, having a dubious morality and goal maybe make her unable to be seen as innocent, but that definitely doesn't make her guilty or evil either, It's just like execute someone with a lack of proofs.

 

Oh yes please help resurrect these giant dragons so they can rampage across Antiva and then the rest of the world!

 

Honor your father by doing this blood magic ritual! Or better yet?! Bring him to me so he can go back to being King and you can abandon everything you swore to uphold! Again!

 

All she really needed was the evil Mwuaaha laugh :P


  • Deztyn aime ceci

#184
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

Fine, I take the "hate mages" argument back, still, he is ignorant, incompetent, dumb and really, really peevish, and I still seeing wrong what he did to Yavana, having a dubious morality and goal maybe make her unable to be seen as innocent, but that definitely doesn't make her guilty or evil either, It's just like execute someone with a lack of proofs.

Well almost all of those are debatable as after all he managed run country for good period of time and if his epilogues were truth he is doing not so horrible job , but i would agree on some of that as pretty much sheltering mages was quite dumb decision.Yavana was manipulating him ,had questionable goals not to mention she was involved in forbidden magic.Like warder said dragons are menace so more of them and even worse than high dragons wouldn't be very good for people to put it lightly.

 


  • Deztyn aime ceci

#185
Andromelek

Andromelek
  • Members
  • 1 161 messages

Oh yes please help resurrect these giant dragons so they can rampage across Antiva and then the rest of the world!

Honor your father by doing this blood magic ritual! Or better yet?! Bring him to me so he can go back to being King and you can abandon everything you swore to uphold! Again!

All she really needed was the evil Mwuaaha laugh :P

There is always the phrase "fuckyou, I won't help you" given that he has templar skills, recurring to violence would likely hurt one of them if not both, I doubt she wanted such thing, so her hands would be basically tied.

And again, how you said in the other thread, is just merely speculation you say that she or the Dragons would turn to be bad and I say they won't, we don't know the truth but if you wish we can bet about it.

Edit: Maric agreed with Flemeth's terms, if he would thought that awakening some dragons was a bad idea, he wouldn't leave Ferelden in first place.

#186
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

"Bad" Such a subjective term and unfortunately not applicable here.

 

Morality, Philosophy are all not applicable here because the Dragons themselves are not creatures of such belief or tenant unlike thinking sapient beings.

 

Dragons are animals, intelligent sure but merely animals that's lore.

 

They have no higher reasoning within them other then recognizing their kin and occasionally granting a boon or two.

 

So by bad do you mean a threat? Because that's not merely a interpretation, that's the reality of Dragon Age.

 

Dragons are one to two story tall killing machines; They can threaten entire communities, cities.

 

I think you've been drinking the koolaid bro.

 

"Man's cruelty" as the swamp hag described it was the natural reaction apex predators trying to eat them.


  • Deztyn aime ceci

#187
teh DRUMPf!!

teh DRUMPf!!
  • Members
  • 9 142 messages

 On the topic of Alistair/Loghain.

 

When it comes down to it, I just prefer having Loghain to Alistair. Alistair was to me what Morrigan is to seemingly everybody else: that party member that disapproves of everything you do. I did not really dislike him (although, his letters as king and cameo appearance as Warden in Inquisition were so irritating that I retroactively wonder how I put up with him all that time). He just did not fit in. Loghain is more what I prefer.

 

Anders is a non-choice, though. He dies every time, even before I installed The Exiled Prince. Quite frankly I would not have kept him even that long if I did not *have* to.



#188
Andromelek

Andromelek
  • Members
  • 1 161 messages

"Bad" Such a subjective term and unfortunately not applicable here.
 
Morality, Philosophy are all not applicable here because the Dragons themselves are not creatures of such belief or tenant unlike thinking sapient beings.
 
Dragons are animals, intelligent sure but merely animals that's lore.
 
They have no higher reasoning within them other then recognizing their kin and occasionally granting a boon or two.
 
So by bad do you mean a threat? Because that's not merely a interpretation, that's the reality of Dragon Age.
 
Dragons are one to two story tall killing machines; They can threaten entire communities, cities.
 
I think you've been drinking the koolaid bro.
 
"Man's cruelty" as the swamp hag described it was the natural reaction apex predators trying to eat them.


I don't know what's the koolaid, but for the context I get that was either a prank or more likely an insult addressing alcohol/drugs , but anyway.

They're territorial beings, meaning that unless they run out of food or some threat like darkspawn or red lyrium spawns on their territory, they would likely remain there, that only supposes a danger for curious, but unless you're up to kill every snake and burn every poisonous plant, a dragon makes a little difference.

Second, taking beside that messing with any kind of particular creature will surely affect the rest on the ecosystem, the lore also states that Dragons are somehow connected to the world, extinguishing them won't be exactly better for most.

Third, she meant cruelty towards everything, not only towards Dragons, pretty sure that puppies, elves, Qunary and other humans aren't apex predators trying to eat humans.

And finally, if you believe that size is the best advantage the nature can offer, I'm afraid you are wrong, the most evolved and successful predators are often small and organized creatures, Dragons only keep some males with them, and the young leave the nest with a very low survival ratio, the females can be big and the elemental breath is definitely a dangerous weapon, but numbers and cunning will always overpower size and weapons.

Now, I went too off topic, if you have anything else to argue, I suggest you open another thread for it.

#189
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages
The part of me that dislikes ignorance prompted me to post this.

"Drinking the Kool-Aid" is a figure of speech commonly used in North America that refers to a person or group holding an unquestioned belief, argument, or philosophy without critical examination. It could also refer to knowingly going along with a doomed or dangerous idea because of peer pressure. The phrase oftentimes carries a negative connotation when applied to an individual or group. It can also be used ironically or humorously to refer to accepting an idea or changing a preference due to popularity, peer pressure, or persuasion. The phrase derives from the November 1978 Jonestown deaths,[1][2][3] in which over 900 members of the Peoples Temple, who were followers of Jim Jones, committed suicide by drinking a mixture of a powdered soft drink flavoring agent laced with cyanide.[4][5] Although the powder used in the incident included Flavor Aid, it was commonly referred to as Kool-Aid due to the latter's status as a genericized trademark.

https://en.m.wikiped...ng_the_Kool-Aid

There you go :)

#190
Andromelek

Andromelek
  • Members
  • 1 161 messages
Thanks, and just so you know, I'm not from North America and I'm not exactly the most social person, so I'm not familiar to such terms.

#191
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages
Incidentally I was born a year after that mass suicide :P

#192
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

I don't know what's the koolaid, but for the context I get that was either a prank or more likely an insult addressing alcohol/drugs , but anyway.

They're territorial beings, meaning that unless they run out of food or some threat like darkspawn or red lyrium spawns on their territory, they would likely remain there, that only supposes a danger for curious, but unless you're up to kill every snake and burn every poisonous plant, a dragon makes a little difference.

Second, taking beside that messing with any kind of particular creature will surely affect the rest on the ecosystem, the lore also states that Dragons are somehow connected to the world, extinguishing them won't be exactly better for most.

Third, she meant cruelty towards everything, not only towards Dragons, pretty sure that puppies, elves, Qunary and other humans aren't apex predators trying to eat humans.

And finally, if you believe that size is the best advantage the nature can offer, I'm afraid you are wrong, the most evolved and successful predators are often small and organized creatures, Dragons only keep some males with them, and the young leave the nest with a very low survival ratio, the females can be big and the elemental breath is definitely a dangerous weapon, but numbers and cunning will always overpower size and weapons.

Now, I went too off topic, if you have anything else to argue, I suggest you open another thread for it.

Yeah, well tell that to the victims of dragon rampages like when dragon age started , kirkwall mnies (twice) and as seen in inquisition dragons burning everything that moved around.

 

If somone was messing with it was yavana and i doubt world will collapse beacuse of it.



#193
Deztyn

Deztyn
  • Members
  • 885 messages

Wait was that part directed to me?
If so i have provided plenty of reasons to dismiss it from part about associates to "helping kirkwall" when pretty much he gave away his intentions of revenge on kirkwall because you spared anders from get go in da 2 , and then again there is fact the only factor that makes him attack kirkwall is sparing Anders and it is pretty much telling.

The problem with your reasoning is first, you are assuming Sebastian knows what we know. That most of the people who knew Anders either want nothing to do with him or are no longer in Kirkwall. Even that is debatable and dependent on your choices in game.

Second, you are clinging to something he said in the heat of the moment three years ago immediately after the Chantry explosion, and assuming that there is nothing more than that.

Yes, he attacks Kirkwall only if Anders is spared and there is no question that revenge is a prime motivator, but that doesn't mean he can't also sincerely believe that he is doing what's best for Kirkwall.

I abhor black and white morality. Situations are rarely that simple.

People just can't/don't want to accept that their "heroes" (or perhaps their favourite characters) are as bad as the other guys, while Alistair and Sebastian have their zealot fans using whatever excuse they have to make their bad actions look pretty, people hate Oghren to death for being a dirty drunk, who understands people?

Hmmm.

I don't pretend that Alistair is a perfect man. (Nor is Sebastian.) But I don't exaggerate their flaws.

Did Alistair make a mistake by leaving the Wardens? Yes. Absolutely. That's why he ends up a miserable drunk, drowning himself in alcohol to cope with the guilt and shame.

Do I fault his character for it? Nope.

As a player I've read The Stolen Throne, I've seen all the forum debates, I understand who Loghain is, what drives him and I know him to be a great general who will be loyal to me until the end. I know that David Gaider had said that Loghain didn't plan to betray Cailan in advance and only decided to quit the field the moment he signaled the retreat. I know the secret to defeating the Archdemon. I know that Alistair isn't just another soldier with a sword and shield, he's my main tank and pretty damn irreplaceable.

Alistair doesn't know all that, and neither does The Warden.

Loghain earned his execution and sparing him is a terrible decision when made without metagaming. Alistair's reasons for objecting are completely sound.

Alistair's and Sebastian's arses were meant to be sitting on a throne away from Kirkwall or Antiva.

So now we think that Alistair should be King?

Also i don't get why people put Alistair into same bag that they put Sebastian , Alistair wanted revenge against guy who wronged him if you refuse to kill loghain he will leave (of course that still makes him quite hypocritical after all his talk about grey wardens doing what they have to) and that is about it ,when sebastian pretty much not only left but targeted entire city just because guy who wronged him used to live in that city.

Because if they don't demonize Alistair for having an understandably flawed human reaction that's actually backed by the knowledge available to the characters at the time, it's harder to justify their Loghain ******.


The only truly good reason The Warden had for sparing Loghain is Riordan's vague hint that they need more Wardens on hand, and that evaporates as soon as Alistair says "It's him or me. "

The only experience The Warden has with Loghain's military prowess is the disaster at Ostagar, as Alistair points out.

His reputation as a war hero should be in question to anyone except perhaps a human noble, who would likely be familiar with his actual history rather than just his legend.

His honor and trustworthiness should definitely be a question mark. Throughout the game he's used every shady tactic imaginable to secure his grip on Ferelden -- poisoning his competition, sowing dissent in the Circle, hiring assassins to eliminate The Wardens, kidnapping his own daughter, selling his subjects into slavery, and as far as the characters know planned to let his King die to grab power for himself then blamed the Wardens for it-- As Alistair points out.

Alistair is also a threat to his daughter just by breathing, so even if he was willing to overlook all of the above, he'd still have reason to fear letting Loghain fight at his side.

Yet, The Warden chooses to trust his life to him because. . .?

Alistair is wrong to quit the Wardens, but is certainly justified in being angry.

Because they hate mages, only get the crown to fulfill their mindless revenge, hurt innocents and hide under a sanctimonious' mask did I miss something?

Neither hate mages. Alistair gives them sanctuary in Redcliffe. If you execute Anders and side with the mages, Sebastian does as well and will even say "Not every mage is Anders."

Hardened Alistair wants to be King. Rival Sebastian wants to rule Starkhaven.


If he didn't exile her, Ferelden would become the laughing stock of Thedas and the nobles would lose confidence in their king.

True.

Alistair's always dreamed about having a real family though. If he knew she was his mother before the deal with Alexius, I think he might be foolish enough to forgive her if she turned on the waterworks.

On the topic of Alistair/Loghain.

When it comes down to it, I just prefer having Loghain to Alistair. Alistair was to me what Morrigan is to seemingly everybody else: that party member that disapproves of everything you do. I did not really dislike him (although, his letters as king and cameo appearance as Warden in Inquisition were so irritating that I retroactively wonder how I put up with him all that time). He just did not fit in. Loghain is more what I prefer.

Alistair's letters irritated me too, even as a fan, but in this case I blame poor writing rather than the character. Alistair was more mature than that at 19. Yes, he could be childish, blindly idealistic and tried too hard to be funny at times. He could also be serious when seriousness was required. When he wasn't, it was generally a deliberate use of humor to deflect or diffuse tension. This is him after 10 years ruling a nation? Pfft. If the messages had been addressed to Leliana instead of the Inquisition, maybe I'd let it pass. They weren't. So I can believe he regressed to unseen levels of immaturity despite shouldering the responsibility of ruling a country through hard times for a decade, or believe the writers were trying so hard to sound like 'funny Alistair', they didn't consider whether he'd actually sound like that when writing a formal request for aid from someone he either never met, or only met when exiling one of their allies.

I pick option 2.

I liked Warden Alistair though. His blind idealism didn't survive ten years as a Warden and he's gotten bitter. I approve of this change.
  • teh DRUMPf!! aime ceci

#194
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 585 messages
He is visibly more mature when married to Anora.

"Grand Enchanter! Imagine my surprise when I learned you had given Redcliff over to a Tevinter Magister. Especially since I am fairly certain it belongs to Arl Teagan."

VS

"Grand Enchanter, we would like to discuss your abuse of our hospitality."

Anora beat him into shape.
  • Ieldra, dragonflight288, teh DRUMPf!! et 1 autre aiment ceci

#195
dragonflight288

dragonflight288
  • Members
  • 8 852 messages

And how manchild that decided invade kirkwall because some guy who wronged him used to live in same city suppose make that city better place lol if something it will make it worse because city will be under control of manchild that picks up on that very city in act of misplaced revenge. 

 

And? Avoiding that hawke had no obligation to kill anders sebastian was free to do so he didn't so he can blame only himself for not taking initiative.

 

Doth my eyes deceive me?

 

TheKomandorShepard is making an argument that supports not punishing the masses for the actions of the individual and stating with moral authority that genocide in the name of peace is not the way?  :D

 

Wow.



#196
dragonflight288

dragonflight288
  • Members
  • 8 852 messages

Quite.

 

Harboring the dissidents who not only betrayed the Monarchy who protected them but also aligned with a hostile foreign power in a attempt at invasion...yeah...

 

Orlais would probably never stop writing comedies about that one.

 

Forget Orlais, I wouldn't be able to stop mocking Alistair if that happened, and I usually support mages in playthroughs. But even then my first playthrough I went to Redcliff specifically because Tevinter had set up shop, and then conscripted the mages because of Fiona's idiocy. 



#197
Andromelek

Andromelek
  • Members
  • 1 161 messages
Deztyn, I think I've pointed out before that my hate towards Alistair is as a player and that also is influenced because I know what he will and could have done.

I also question his reasons, because while you use slavery to shield him from Loghain and the "dragon threat" from Yavana, he clearly makes emphasis on less logical reasons.

He takes Duncan as his first argument against Loghain and Maric and everything that happened to Ferelden against Yavana even when she had nothing to do with it (Yes, he doesn't know that the Architect began the blight, but he knows that the deal was between Flemeth and Maric and that Ostagar and many things happened during the Blight were Loghain's fault, that makes him see stupid and childish, because he's applying the same fault to different persons that clearly didn't met each other.)

About the argument of "he should be on Ferelden", well the comics seemingly happen anyway (would be worth to press bioware to point out any difference on this and ME according to the player's choice) the background of the made comic was hardened Alistair ruling Ferelden alone, given that Ferelden stills on a deep hole in Inquisition (I would agree that the poor writing of the game could be blamed for this) he should be more concerned of his living country that looking for his father that as far as he knew was dead, retrieving a corpse is far less important than take care of a country.

Back to the metagame, if I kill Alistair in Origins instead of throwing him with the Nightmare is because that's the only way to give Loghain the punishment he deserves and save Hawke, Stroud, Yavana and even possibly Titus and Claudio.

Before you begin to point Yavana's "dubious" goal again I recall that I'm speaking on the metagame, the same and definitely worse things can be told about the Architect, yet you see that siding him was the right thing to do. Second, if you are really too concerned about the "dragon threat", I think that killing Alistair is more logic than killing Yavana in order to prevent that from happening, even if she doesn't have any mean to come back, someone else (perhaps someone with less scruples than the Witches of the Wilds) can easily hunt down Alistair and awake the dragons in one move.
  • Boost32 aime ceci

#198
Deztyn

Deztyn
  • Members
  • 885 messages
So. . . lemme see if I get this . . . executing Alistair (instead of just exiling him or marrying him to Anora) is a good decision . . . so you can have Loghain get the fate you think he deserves for the many, many lives he destroyed . . . not a quick clean death of course, Maker forbid . . .. And sparing the Architect . . . the guy who caused the 5th Blight . . . and maybe even Blights in general . . . killing an untold number of people in his idiotic blundering . . . is also a good choice . . . unlike letting Alistair live to maybe kill a swamp witch . . . because killing swamp witches is absolutely unforgivable. . ..

. . .there is a point where even I have to throw my hands in the air and give up.
  • Ieldra, Exile Isan et The Baconer aiment ceci

#199
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

The problem with your reasoning is first, you are assuming Sebastian knows what we know. That most of the people who knew Anders either want nothing to do with him or are no longer in Kirkwall. Even that is debatable and dependent on your choices in game.

Second, you are clinging to something he said in the heat of the moment three years ago immediately after the Chantry explosion, and assuming that there is nothing more than that.

Yes, he attacks Kirkwall only if Anders is spared and there is no question that revenge is a prime motivator, but that doesn't mean he can't also sincerely believe that he is doing what's best for Kirkwall.

I abhor black and white morality. Situations are rarely that simple.
 

He knows what we know ,i have said it already he was there when aveline could have left hawke and he was there when hawke said "gtfo" to anders breaking ties with him.So, again even one choice that deems them not being anders associate proves us that he is manchiled that wants revenge on that city.

 

And i have every right to do so ,again he betrayed his motives and intentions toward kirkwall from get go and in dai he did what he promised in da 2, avoiding that attacking city to find 1 person it pretty much have nothing to do outside that used to live there years ago is ridiculous and something mad man would do.

 

Pretty much i commented on it already for an example above. 

 

It isn't even about morality it is about mad manchiled that targeted city because as i said before one person used to live in that city.It is pretty much pure example of misplaced revenge and ridiculous one , he is like sasuke uchiha in da setting.

 

 

 

Doth my eyes deceive me?

 

TheKomandorShepard is making an argument that supports not punishing the masses for the actions of the individual and stating with moral authority that genocide in the name of peace is not the way?  :D

 

Wow.

You are talking about my stance on mages? Because pretty sure it has nothing to do with punishing mages for actions of the indiviudal and is more about protecting world from dangers that mages represent and those "invididuals" only show that dangers.  



#200
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 188 messages

So. . . lemme see if I get this . . . executing Alistair (instead of just exiling him or marrying him to Anora) is a good decision . . . so you can have Loghain get the fate you think he deserves for the many, many lives he destroyed . . . not a quick clean death of course, Maker forbid . . .. And sparing the Architect . . . the guy who caused the 5th Blight . . . and maybe even Blights in general . . . killing an untold number of people in his idiotic blundering . . . is also a good choice . . . unlike letting Alistair live to maybe kill a swamp witch . . . because killing swamp witches is absolutely unforgivable. . ..

. . .there is a point where even I have to throw my hands in the air and give up.

Blame metagaming. I think Alistair killing Yavana is wilful murder with little justification, but even if there is a chain of decisions that plausibly removes that from canon, I still need to justify the decisions based on my characters' personalities, and the decisions required appear to be based on contradictory traits. Particularly, why would a character who wilfully murders Alistair, and who is intent on causing a maximum of pain because of selective vengefulness, have a problem with someone killing Yavana? As a rule, if I play a character, an echo of my thoughts will always be in them.

 

Speaking about selective vengefulness, that's exactly what Sebastian is displaying and why I tend to do my best to thwart his goals. Attacking Kirkwall does nothing but exacerbating the damage done by Anders. As long as order is kept in Kirkwall - Aveline appears to be doing a good job - and people can start to live their lives once more after the disastrous events of DA2, Sebastian has no convincing justification for an intervention. He's either a vengeful brat or a ruthless conqueror. In fact, I would respect him more if he were the latter and honest about it. I can respect imperial ambitions. Petty vengefulness, not so much.  


  • PhroXenGold, Deztyn, Uccio et 1 autre aiment ceci