It sound nice on paper but practically try to please everyone is most horrible think to do for book/movie/game. People like different thinks. Like I don't like killing my enemy, DA:I more or less allowed me it and I am happy but for some it not important and they rather have more kill animations. Or I like samara hanging melons some people want to put her in iron man hulkbuster armor, I don't want what it. Look at DA:I I never asked "open world" and exploration and i hate i because they wasted time and resources for something I never wanted, looks like ME will be same boring fetch quest time sink. And so on and on.
Whatever flaws DAI has, outfits were thankfully not one of them. Since we are able to craft armors for ourselves and our squadmates, none of them (even Iron Hull) are required to flash ridiculous amounts of skin.
Wheras in ME2, EVERYONE was forced to deal with Samara forgetting how a zipper works.
"It's a waste of zots" isn't an inherently unreasonable request to a proposed new feature, is it?
Zots are a factor to be sure. Though that rarely seems to be a counterargument. More often it's accusations of being a prude, of being overly religious/conservative/overly sensitive. They attack the person rather than the idea.