Only speaking for myself, but I prefer to purchase games with a less than M rating, as the content had generally been contained by the Devs themselves. If it is rated M, then I seek to look for options before purchase (eg; nudity contained to optional content, optional gore settings, offensive language manageable by benching characters or optional content).
And Yes; I lobby to have more games that fit these parameters, and pass on those that do not. Seems like most consumers do that. Hopefully will have more future titles that can be purchased than skipped, esp if all that is needed is a possible Toggle.
Lobbying is an annoying practice. It favours those who have more resources than others, in your case it seems the resource is time.
How would you know what most consumers want? If you have that knowledge, than it is worth your weight in gold. Or are you extrapolating from your own anecdotal experience again like you always do? There is no factual evidence supporting your claim, especially since it runs counter normal human behaviour. Who would want to get less when they could have more?
Your possible Toggle is a bad idea, as has been pointed out over and over again and honestly, it's an unrealistic idea. If it was as possible as you think it is, then there would be games with such a feature in existence already. Name one and I'll retract my argument.
Cannot see why, as long as the requests are constructive and civil. As for others, that is another reason for the Ignore function.
And the design call should be made by the Devs; not some vocal majority. Final call should be the consumer, as whether to purchase or not.
Elhanan, civility is just something you hide behind. As many in this forum, you do not observe the art of discussion, of conversation etiquette... all you care about is an absence of profanity. That's the main reason why discussions with you will never be constructive. It's just an endless repetition of the same tired request over and over again, shored up by increasingly transparent arguments.
That is your option and opinion. Mine is different. Neither is superior or inferior to the other, as a rule.
As long as we remain civil and respect the rights (as set by ToS) of all to have differing opinions, then it should be fine. If you were to ask for T rated games to become M, that is your right to do so. And it is my right to ask for the Devs to consider 'messing them up' for me.
As a rule, opinions are equal, that is correct. Arguments on the other hand, are not.
I freely admit that your actions in this forum irritate me, because you simply never stop. You already asked the devs to consider your opinion, your idea. What's your reason for repeating this request endlessly? Because if your intent is to abuse the illusion of truth, then you haven't understood how a forum works. While it is correct that things we hear and see more often become familiar and are eventually accepted as truth by our mind, that only works if they are not immediately refuted by something else. Guess why I am responding to your posts so often? 
What you are doing here is lobbying, you aren't even trying to argue your point, you're just droning on and on...
Thought police; George Orwell must be soooo pleased.....
Have you read 1984? Seen the movie?
I wonder, was there a censored version more palatable to your tastes?
Retour en haut
