Sorry for the double post. Here is the art that I posted in the other thread for comparison (apparently I can't embed pictures from my phone here, so you'll just have to click on the link).
You can see the similarity. Bernal Spheres are useful as space stations as well; however, if you are building a relativistic starship and want to create an artificial gravity of 1g but your method of acceleration is less than that, then you have to spin the ship and use a modified Bernal Sphere design.
The main difference between a Bernal Sphere used as a space station and one used as a starship, for those that are interested, is that for a space station the 1g region is exactly at the spheres equator and therefore conceptually similar to a Stanford torus at that region. But for a starship with constant acceleration, it is not at the equator - but 30,40, etc degrees depending on the linear degree of acceleration.
The greater the acceleration, the "flatter" the ground appears relative to the axis of rotation. With a constant acceleration of 1g, the habitat does not have to spin and in fact doesn't need to be a sphere at all, but rather a flat surface - thus a much more "normal" starship design except the floors would be perpendicular to the direction of acceleration.
https://upload.wikim...l_Sphere_3.jpeghttp://www.wired.com...09/bernal_2.jpg
Side note**: For those that have seen the movie Interstellar, the starship at the end appears to be a modified O'Neil Cylinder with characteristics of a Bernal Sphere as well.