To return to the topic, I think the main problem is 'whether or not the Mass Effect series remains with a set Protagonist'. Do we go the Dragon Age, which features a new character each game, or even the Resident Evil route, which cycles through a relatively set main cast?
- If we are going for a set Protagonist (IE A Shepard, A Nathan Drake, A Bomberman ETC) Then how wildly different do we want this character to be while also being able to properly support all those choices going forward? If we want a more developed character and continue their story and see the consequences of their and thus our actions this is the way to go. If we want to maintain the same level of companion interaction and camaraderie that we got in the Shepard Trilogy this is also the way to go.
In Dragon Age, we may get giddy when we see Morrigan or Human Liara* make another appearance, but our character doesn't really think much of them because they aren't the same character we were. There is a difference in player reaction and character reaction that reduces the level of intimacy that can occur between the player and this character they've known across a prior game since their mediator does not share the player's views.
- If, however, we go the varied Protagonist (Warden, Inquisitor, ETC) route, how many choices of that character move on to the next one? How much customization really matters in the end? If we want more diversity in what our characters look like and in how they act, this is the way to go. The protagonist doesn't have to be as important or well-written as they will not be used in a starring role later on. Perhaps their companions might appear again, but this character will only see a limited role in future entries and may not even appear at all! (Warden). Not being so defined or well-written lets the wonderfully chaotic world of 'Head Canon' spring forth. with reckless abandon, and that is, again, a wonderful world.
--------------------
We know we are playing a human in the next game, but will the game after Andromeda feature this very same human, or will we move on to a new character who may be a Turian, or a Krogan, or perhaps we see the galaxy from the eyes of a domestic race**? I'm curious as to which approach they go for, though I'd rather prefer former protagonist type, leaving the 'Story of the World***' to Dragon Age and the 'Story of One' to a series of Mass Effect games, even if it means jumping to a new protagonist every three games.
--------------------
* Leliana.
** English is a wonderful thing. Did you know that 'Bromance' is now officially a word according to Merriam-Webster? It's true, look it up! In fact, here's a link! Languages evolve and change and not everything means the same thing every time when used, especially as time marches every onwards. After all, Legal Insanity and Medical Insanity are two drastically different things that only have one small similarity that keeps them locked together, however detached that may be. What's more, there was a time when the primary definition for the word gay was 'to be rather happy' which is not entirely the case now, the same can be said for the word 'awesome' which meant something wholesomely different from what it is thought of now. In matters of fiction writing versus maters of biology, the term 'race' is used to refer to any sentient/sapient species of that particular universe (EX. Tolkien's 'Race of Men', High Fantasy's Elven races ETC)
*** Let's face it, people: Dragon Age is really just the high fantasy version of The Gods Must be Crazy, co-starring Morrigan, Leliana, Flemeth, and whatever sub-protagonist they can dig up who is probably voiced by Tory Baker or something I dunno.