Aller au contenu

Photo

New Game +.....seriously.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
89 réponses à ce sujet

#1
crimzontearz

crimzontearz
  • Members
  • 16 789 messages
Come on Bioware. Even CDPR is adding it to TW3 and for free (to that extent...suck it you all who said it would never happen because the game did not need it/could not be done/people who want it are whiners who want cake walks). I would PAY FOR IT more than willingly (if done right...none of this BS like Arkham knight or Darksiders 2) if it came ro DAI.

Seriously at this point for some reason you guys just REFUSE to put it in....it's not that you CAN'T (given there ARE scaling parts in DAI that is not even an excuse) so why is it that this simple feature is so neglected????
  • HydroFlame20 aime ceci

#2
Akrabra

Akrabra
  • Members
  • 2 364 messages

No other Dragon Age game has had NG + so why would Inquisition? They are following the same pattern as always. Level 24 if you do everything and extend into level 30 with DLC and a possible expansion,



#3
crimzontearz

crimzontearz
  • Members
  • 16 789 messages
Neither did the witcher series...or deus Ex up until the HR GOTY edition. But guess what? In both it was added and now it will be a starting feature in Mankind divided to the delight of the fans. Even with people like you saying it was not needed. Was it to be introduced would it REALLY ruin your experience? For that matter is it going to retroactively ruin the experience of those who already played TW3 without it? I think not.
  • KBomb, KonguZya, Lord Bolton et 1 autre aiment ceci

#4
Akrabra

Akrabra
  • Members
  • 2 364 messages

Neither did the witcher series...or deus Ex up until the HR GOTY edition. But guess what? In both it was added and now it will be a starting feature in Mankind divided to the delight of the fans. Even with people like you saying it was not needed. Was it to be introduced would it REALLY ruin your experience? For that matter is it going to retroactively ruin the experience of those who already played TW3 without it? I think not.

Its not the same. Geralt is already a experienced Witcher and that he actually starts at level 1 in The Witcher 3 is a joke. The Inquisitor is a nobody, if they were to start the game in a full dragon crafted armor with the best weapon and already level 24 it wouldn't fit the story it is telling. Every Bioware fantasy RPG is about rising from nothing to become the hero. That is just my take on it, and i prefer the series to be that way. 


  • Ariella, Exile Isan et Atillaiswutz aiment ceci

#5
crimzontearz

crimzontearz
  • Members
  • 16 789 messages
Hopefully they will not listen to you then.

For that matter it does not make sense to have Shepard have spectre grade gear at the beginning of ME1 but NG+ allowed you to and even after removing it early in ME2 development they quickly reintroduced it after fan outcry. If YOU don't like the feature feel free not to use it instead of proposing to diminish someone else's enjoyment because it does not match your ideal of it TYVM.
  • KonguZya et HydroFlame20 aiment ceci

#6
correctamundo

correctamundo
  • Members
  • 1 673 messages

Its not the same. Geralt is already a experienced Witcher and that he actually starts at level 1 in The Witcher 3 is a joke. The Inquisitor is a nobody, if they were to start the game in a full dragonbone armor with the best weapon and already level 24 it wouldn't fit the story it is telling. Every Bioware fantasy RPG is about rising from nothing to become the hero. That is just my take on it, and i prefer the series to be that way. 

 

I cannot agree on the nobody thing since all of them have previous experience but I don't see the point of this new game plus thing at all.



#7
crimzontearz

crimzontearz
  • Members
  • 16 789 messages
Replayability. See my above post about ME2 and Deus Ex and TW3. Some people dislike losing their progress on a new game.

#8
Wolven_Soul

Wolven_Soul
  • Members
  • 1 689 messages

Come on Bioware. Even CDPR is adding it to TW3 and for free (to that extent...suck it you all who said it would never happen because the game did not need it/could not be done/people who want it are whiners who want cake walks). I would PAY FOR IT more than willingly (if done right...none of this BS like Arkham knight or Darksiders 2) if it came ro DAI.

Seriously at this point for some reason you guys just REFUSE to put it in....it's not that you CAN'T (given there ARE scaling parts in DAI that is not even an excuse) so why is it that this simple feature is so neglected????

Why do so many people want a new game + mode for so badly?  The only games I have ever used it on are survival horror games so I can go through it with fully upgraded weapons to get achievements and what not.  But for an RPG?  Don't see the point.

 

Especially as you would have to play the game as the same character.  Same race, same class.  Sure you can use different decisions, but even so, that sounds boring.


  • slimgrin aime ceci

#9
crimzontearz

crimzontearz
  • Members
  • 16 789 messages
To you...sounds boring TO YOU.

I played ME1&2 20 something times wach. ALL NG+ runs.

#10
Dutch's Ghost

Dutch's Ghost
  • Members
  • 722 messages

No other Dragon Age game has had NG + so why would Inquisition? They are following the same pattern as always. Level 24 if you do everything and extend into level 30 with DLC and a possible expansion,


And why shouldn't they do it? New game + adds to replayablility and the fun factor as you boost everything up. Oh right because Bioware are lazy, they have our money and fans like yourself are destroying the industry by patting these good for nothing devs for releasing mediocre products.
  • Lord Bolton et line_genrou aiment ceci

#11
Dutch's Ghost

Dutch's Ghost
  • Members
  • 722 messages

Why do so many people want a new game + mode for so badly? The only games I have ever used it on are survival horror games so I can go through it with fully upgraded weapons to get achievements and what not. But for an RPG? Don't see the point.

Especially as you would have to play the game as the same character. Same race, same class. Sure you can use different decisions, but even so, that sounds boring.


So you see the fun in slogging in another playthrough where the first half consists of mediocre gameplay until you level up to a point where you can actually get worthwhile abilities? If you don't like it then don't play it, new game plus adds replayablility and fun but oh wait the biodrones hate both replayabiliity and fun and so we fans that want it are forced to not have it because the drones have a better sway of the devs since they kiss their feets for releasing a trash product like DAI.

This game needs New Game plus.

#12
Dutch's Ghost

Dutch's Ghost
  • Members
  • 722 messages

To you...sounds boring TO YOU.

I played ME1&2 20 something times wach. ALL NG+ runs.

I agree with you. I don't understand these Bioware lover punks who don't like fun. New game plus is always fun, to say the opposite is frankly retarded and this game needs it for challenge. I wouldn't mind new game plus because I'd rather start a new game with a well built character then a game where i have nothing and have to slog through 100hours of mediocrity and fetch quests to get my gears, ability and perks!

#13
Dutch's Ghost

Dutch's Ghost
  • Members
  • 722 messages
I'm glad CDPR actually listens to its fans. New game plus will add to replayablility and challenge as well as fun. Bioware already made their money so they don't care. Shame.

#14
Boost32

Boost32
  • Members
  • 3 352 messages
I agree with this, BioWare really should do new game + for dragon age.
I really want to play with my canon character again, but starting everything again from LVL 1 and going through the rng schematics again is impossible for me.
  • Dutch's Ghost aime ceci

#15
katerinafm

katerinafm
  • Members
  • 4 291 messages

If they add a new game+ they'd need to double the level cap. I was around level 25 and easily reached the 27 level cap at the beginning of Jaws of Hakkon.



#16
slimgrin

slimgrin
  • Members
  • 12 486 messages

Come on Bioware. Even CDPR is adding it to TW3 and for free (to that extent...suck it you all who said it would never happen because the game did not need it/could not be done/people who want it are whiners who want cake walks). I would PAY FOR IT more than willingly (if done right...none of this BS like Arkham knight or Darksiders 2) if it came ro DAI.

Seriously at this point for some reason you guys just REFUSE to put it in....it's not that you CAN'T (given there ARE scaling parts in DAI that is not even an excuse) so why is it that this simple feature is so neglected????

 

The game did not need it. NG+ makes no sense in an RPG



#17
Boost32

Boost32
  • Members
  • 3 352 messages

The game did not need it. NG+ makes no sense in an RPG

I disagree with you, every RPG need it.

If they add a new game+ they'd need to double the level cap. I was around level 25 and easily reached the 27 level cap at the beginning of Jaws of Hakkon.

There is no need for more lvl, NG+ is made for you to have every precious ability you had avaliable from the start. In Mass Effect 3 you can reach lvl 60 in your first playthrough and continuously play again with NG+.

#18
ashwind

ashwind
  • Members
  • 3 150 messages

If they add a new game+ they'd need to double the level cap. I was around level 25 and easily reached the 27 level cap at the beginning of Jaws of Hakkon.

Think dev said that there isn't a hard level cap in DAI. As long as there r enemies that give u xp, u can eventually gain a level fighting them.

[Edit]
As for NG+, I usually don't have a strong opinion for or against it. However I will make an exception for DAI, anything to reduce mmoish farming is a good thing. Therefore I support NG+ for DAI. Only because DAI is a very annoying game to play.
  • Lord Bolton, line_genrou, Yaroub et 1 autre aiment ceci

#19
Dutch's Ghost

Dutch's Ghost
  • Members
  • 722 messages

The game did not need it. NG+ makes no sense in an RPG


Actually it does. It's a game.
  • CDR Aedan Cousland aime ceci

#20
Elhanan

Elhanan
  • Members
  • 18 626 messages
Would rather have the next title allow for higher levels, as well as more end game content for DAI DLC.

#21
roselavellan

roselavellan
  • Members
  • 475 messages

I would love to start new playthroughs with my current character, so if NG+ lets me do that, then I'd be happy, as long as there aren't massive over-levelling issues.

 

Also, in defence of NG+, I think that it, or at least some form of it, does make sense for an RPG, if it gives you the ability to go back and explore different choices (which is what an RPG is about, isn't it?). Here's what I'd want for a DAI NG+:

  • My character
  • My items
  • All my shards
  • All my mosaics


#22
Al Foley

Al Foley
  • Members
  • 14 542 messages

I don't want NG +.  Per se, though I would not mind having schematics save over from one playthrough to the next...but I do want the ability to import my Inquisitor's faces over from one play through to the next easily.  



#23
caradoc2000

caradoc2000
  • Members
  • 7 550 messages

Think dev said that there isn't a hard level cap in DAI. As long as there r enemies that give u xp, u can eventually gain a level fighting them.

The level cap is 27.



#24
TheOgre

TheOgre
  • Members
  • 2 260 messages

Well since they hid the other NG + thread, I'll repost why it's a good idea for Dragon Age

 

Less time grinding for schematics

Can play around more with the dragon age keep to see vastly different worlds

Not having to recreate your 'perfect' inquisitor while being able to replay the game again and again.



#25
Serza

Serza
  • Members
  • 13 161 messages

I agree with the husky above me.


  • Ariella et LightningPoodle aiment ceci