303 réponses à ce sujet

[God]

No, I'm pretty you don't speak for everyone here.  Stop thinking your opinion is right while mine is wrong. 

 

Then stop doing the same bub. You're the one with the pdf in your signature stating how the ending to ME3 is 'objectively bad'.

[Jay P]

Then stop doing the same bub. You're the one with the pdf in your signature stating how the ending to ME3 is 'objectively bad'.

The only thing objectively bad is his delusion that his opinion on the ending is somehow not subjective.

[The Arbiter]

Alot of people had issues with the me3 endings, for many reasons (mine being no closure on the breath scene).

How much closure can we expect in the new game? Will BW throw us a bone, give us all a full fan-****** or try and forget the last few hours of ME3 ever existed?

Personally I'm hoping for a meeting with someone long-lived such as Liara or Grunt who can give a definitive account of what happend to Shep

there is no closure... BioWare wrote themselves into a corner and refuses to acknowledge it

[Steelcan]

none whatsoever, they seem to be content to let the thread hang on forever because dealing with it is either too much for them to handle or they are just gutless

[Lonely Heart Poet]

I thought Bioware already told us that there will be nodding to past events. And... when I saw this guy who wears N7 armor in the new trailer... Shepard was an N7 legend even if the ME:A game starts between the one and two... these new N7's can't be totally ignorant and they must know their elite groups history.
Like in the James Vega movie called "Paragon lost" -  everyone knew Shepard.

And even if they totally ignore Shepards story they must have some kind of interest to their home Galaxys state. Whenever the Ark group leaves to Andromeda it is highly likely that they are very interested of what´s going on and I do believe they would use big efforts to find out. The real ending and the happening and the Shepard story must have an impact in ME:A or I really don't know what to say.

I actually have thought some minor things how Bioware would import some of the past story to a new one but too shy to write them down here.

[God]

The less ME:A says about the original trilogy, the better. They really don't need to compound on the convoluted plot of the originals any more than they already have.

 

This is their chance to wipe the slate clean and put ME3's (and ME1 and 2's for that matter) mistakes behind them. They shouldn't waste it.

 

You fail because Dany Sue is your avatar.

[God]

I actually have thought some minor things how Bioware would import some of the past story to a new one but too shy to write them down here.

 

Then why bother mentioning that you have ideas at all?

 

Come on: let's see them.

 

The worst your going to get is a detached and slightly irritated critique that looks at your views analytically. 

 

Plus, some of the people here have opinions that just plain aren't worth a darn. I might even be one of them. 

 

Feedback is feedback: you gotta get your feet wet here somehow.

[DarthSliver]

Sad truth is that everyone in this thread is most likely wrong  

 

I want Bioware to be brave and canonize the ending of ME3 because I was thinking it makes more sense for Andromeda to take place after METrilogy because how do we get the tech to get to Andromeda without more space magic if it happens before the Trilogy has ended.  

[God]

Sad truth is that everyone in this thread is most likely wrong

 

I want Bioware to be brave and canonize the ending of ME3 because I was thinking it makes more sense for Andromeda to take place after METrilogy because how do we get the tech to get to Andromeda without more space magic if it happens before the Trilogy has ended.  

 

You enter FTL and wait a really long time to get there. I'm sure there's someway to drop off the drive charge.

[DarthSliver]

You enter FTL and wait a really long time to get there. I'm sure there's someway to drop off the drive charge.

 

Well after ME3 we either got all those Reapers we shut off to learn from or we got the Synthesis Reaper bond or we got the Almighty Shepard who rules the Reapers now that can help.

 

Or they could go the route since its the far future that this takes place before Andromeda and Milky Way merge into one Galaxy, so space travel to Andromeda is literally not as far as we are thinking because of that lol.  

[O'Voutie O'Rooney]

If at some point the franchise is set far enough in the future at that point they do not need closure. The past will exist, in game, as conflicting legends, assuming that Milky Way events ever show up again. I doubt that MEA is far enough in the future for this to happen, but at some point it probably will.

[DarthSliver]

If at some point the franchise is set far enough in the future at that point they do not need closure. The past will exist, in game, as conflicting legends, assuming that Milky Way events ever show up again. I doubt that MEA is far enough in the future for this to happen, but at some point it probably will.

 

That is probably why there won't be closure for METrilogy, Bioware probably plans to wash it away with time. 

[DaemionMoadrin]

I don't need or want any closure. By the time ME:A is released it'll be 4.5 years since ME3. "Closure" would just open old wounds.

 

ME3 is in the past, let's never speak about it again.

[LinksOcarina]

I don't need or want any closure. By the time ME:A is released it'll be 4.5 years since ME3. "Closure" would just open old wounds.

 

ME3 is in the past, let's never speak about it again.

 

Oh we should speak about it, its how art and enjoyment survive of course.

 

What we shouldn't do is worry about it in the next game. At least, until we have reason to. 

[Eyes_Only]

I'd prefer no mention of it at all, rather that this game begin before the ending of ME3.

 

Maybe it takes shape during the time Shepard is in lock up and her trusty friends are scattered across the galaxy.

 

To mention it means to canon an ending. And my ending is the control ending. best suited imo for my paragon femshep. Let me keep my happy and sad memories were they are... in the past and let me move to make new ones.

[Kabooooom]

That is probably why there won't be closure for METrilogy, Bioware probably plans to wash it away with time.

Nopity nope nope. You know what the primary problem with a "far future" setting like that would be?

Technology would not be even remotely reminiscent to the prior trilogy.

We already know there is the Mako and omnitools. Do you really think such tech would be around tens of thousands of years from now? Nope.

[In Exile]

Nopity nope nope. You know what the primary problem with a "far future" setting like that would be?

Technology would not be even remotely reminiscent to the prior trilogy.

We already know there is the Mako and omnitools. Do you really think such tech would be around tens of thousands of years from now? Nope.

But that's exactly what happened in ME. The entire Citadel races barely advanced in 3000 or so years.

[KumoriYami]

I'd like closure for a few things, though not exactly ME3 related since its be about rachni and dark space, though I wouldn't say no to information about those closest to Shepard and the fate of the galaxy.

 

Still, I expect nothing from Bioware since it stops me from being disappointed and allows for surprise if any closure is made.

[Capt_Kangaroo]

None.

I want MEA to start as a new trilogy with only a small reference to ME 3 right at the begining wondering what happend.

Assume the worst.

 

Cheers

[Kabooooom]

But that's exactly what happened in ME. The entire Citadel races barely advanced in 3000 or so years.

Except the reason for that technological stagnation was explained, and wouldn't exist in the post-Reaper era.

Or to elaborate, we dont really know what the tech was like in the 3,000 ish years of galactic history. We DO know that FTL tech did not advance at all, which is due to the fact that the FTL engines were literally described as a "black box", attributed to the Protheans, that they knew how to construct but little about how they actually worked.

The same is true of most other significant technology. The relay network, as per the Reaper plan, causes stagnation - or at least, relative stagnation along the path they desire.

Granted, it is extremely stupid that the galaxy had to wait for humans to come along to invent omnigel, and other similar examples, or that non-mass effect tech in general had not advanced that much. Honestly, that is more a result of bad writing than any in universe canon believability.

[Kingthlayer]

BioWare have made the decision to leave the Milky Way and all it's Reaperness, and head off to another galaxy.  I expect them to commit to that idea.  They won't, but they should, because they're just going to end up writing themselves into a corner again that they don't know how to get out of.

[wolfsite]

I'm fine with ME3 so it's no big deal about how they handle it.

 

I just hope they don't sacrifice any good ideas or plot points to appease a percentage of the fan base.  I just want them to make the game they want to make and then we simply make to decision to either buy it or not buy it.

[prosthetic soul]

what I say isn't an opinion. Just like 1kg of rice being plenty of food to survive for a week isn't an opinion.

No.  It's a goddamn opinion.  Spare me the arrogance. 

 

As for my sig, I stated it's an OBJECTIVE, FACT-BASED analysis.  Please learn reading comprehension. 

[prosthetic soul]

The only thing objectively bad is his delusion that his opinion on the ending is somehow not subjective.

As opposed to Heretic's delusion that HIS opinion is somehow not subjective?  What the frip is it with you people and your double christ almighty standards? Grow up.