Aller au contenu

Photo

So I managed to Reave a couple of NM runs on FC, that Hakkon man :)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
20 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Unbelievabletekkers

Unbelievabletekkers
  • Members
  • 216 messages

I am getting to grips with her, having only tried her for he first time last week!

 

PLEASE ADD YOUR FAVOURITE REAVER BUILDS BELOW AND I WOULD BE DELIGHTED TO TRY THEM OUT...

 

I'm grinding around 2 Reavers per day played atm...

 

 


  • Drasca et Courtnehh aiment ceci

#2
Yallegro

Yallegro
  • Members
  • 617 messages

Spoiler


  • FatCatTrap aime ceci

#3
Unbelievabletekkers

Unbelievabletekkers
  • Members
  • 216 messages

I don't mind, let them flow lol.  It's about preference and choice, I had a Legionnaire each time, so Combat Roll never figured prominently in my mind.  The panic horn is fun, but I couldn't figure a reason to lose out on other useful passives.  The Ring of Pain is a mandatory skill point usage, so I worked on the basis that it was pre-paid for...



#4
kaileena_sands

kaileena_sands
  • Members
  • 1 489 messages

Well, the build is bananas, there is no doubt about it. I don't mean that to insult you though, everyone can play whatever build they like as long as they are even remotely useful for the team which you seem to be from the videos. :) You can afford it because of that GS.


  • Unbelievabletekkers aime ceci

#5
Unbelievabletekkers

Unbelievabletekkers
  • Members
  • 216 messages

^ Precisely the sword.  I can see why someone said I'd be an exclusive Reaver now :)  


  • Texasmotiv aime ceci

#6
T_elic

T_elic
  • Members
  • 487 messages

I don't think i've ever played the reaver without combat roll. How do you recover from terrors knocking you down continuously?



#7
Gya

Gya
  • Members
  • 1 538 messages

I don't think i've ever played the reaver without combat roll. How do you recover from terrors knocking you down continuously?


Terrors know better than to go near a reaver with Hakkon greatsword. Seriously, whenever I'm in a parry with a Hakkon reaver, I seem to get the aggro from every terror in the zone.
  • Courtnehh et Unbelievabletekkers aiment ceci

#8
Unbelievabletekkers

Unbelievabletekkers
  • Members
  • 216 messages

I don't think i've ever played the reaver without combat roll. How do you recover from terrors knocking you down continuously?

 

I actually let the Lego's draw in aggro and then ran in for the kill, in the first two rounds, I just Reaved the poop out of them and Devoured them, they fall quite swiftly under the Hakkon.

 

In no way can I recommend running solo without 75-125 Constitution as you can get knocked down and ganged up regularlyy from Rd 2 onwards...

 

If it's just one, it's no sweat, if there are two then you gotta rampage through one and hope you don't fall victim to the knockdowns.

 

I played carefully and paused often to let a patch of enemies build up before running in.  It's a learning curve and then eventually you know exactly how to react to each situation.  

 

I certainly wouldn't recommend running without at least a Lego/Templar in your party as they take a lot of pressure/flak off the squishy Reaver :)



#9
Spin-Orbit

Spin-Orbit
  • Members
  • 890 messages

I actually let the Lego's draw in aggro and then ran in for the kill, in the first two rounds, I just Reaved the poop out of them and Devoured them, they fall quite swiftly under the Hakkon.

 

In no way can I recommend running solo without 75-125 Constitution as you can get knocked down and ganged up regularlyy from Rd 2 onwards...

 

If it's just one, it's no sweat, if there are two then you gotta rampage through one and hope you don't fall victim to the knockdowns.

 

I played carefully and paused often to let a patch of enemies build up before running in.  It's a learning curve and then eventually you know exactly how to react to each situation.  

 

I certainly wouldn't recommend running without at least a Lego/Templar in your party as they take a lot of pressure/flak off the squishy Reaver :)

I would like to see you run a solo with reaver at 100 con, since everyone thinks solo is so easy on this forum


  • Kalas Magnus aime ceci

#10
Unbelievabletekkers

Unbelievabletekkers
  • Members
  • 216 messages

One day  my friend, one day, only 55 more Constitution to go :)



#11
Spin-Orbit

Spin-Orbit
  • Members
  • 890 messages

One day  my friend, one day, only 55 more Constitution to go :)

so how could you recommend soloing with 75-125 con?



#12
Unbelievabletekkers

Unbelievabletekkers
  • Members
  • 216 messages

As a rough guestimate of the point at which survivability is noticably upped.  Also I meant solo as in, start the NM match and survive comfortably while randomers join, It may be a bit much without 200 Cunning and at least 100-150 Willpower to go through the whole game...



#13
capn233

capn233
  • Members
  • 17 397 messages

There's probably only one build that makes sense on Reaver.



#14
Spin-Orbit

Spin-Orbit
  • Members
  • 890 messages

As a rough guestimate of the point at which survivability is noticably upped.  Also I meant solo as in, start the NM match and survive comfortably while randomers join, It may be a bit much without 200 Cunning and at least 100-150 Willpower to go through the whole game...

Your not soloing the entire run if that is the case you should be able to do this with 75/75/75 comfortably



#15
Drasca

Drasca
  • Members
  • 2 574 messages

In no way can I recommend running solo without 75-125 Constitution as you can get knocked down and ganged up regularlyy from Rd 2 onwards...

 

That's what the combat roll + warhorn are for.

 

http://forum.bioware...rite-mp-builds/

 

That said notice the preface/introduction (that very few people read), that exact build pathing / optimization depends on personal skill and team builds. No combat roll or war horn is entirely legitimate IF there's allies that taunt and panic everything already, or otherwise CC/Barrier.

 

Solo / Carry though? You need CR + Warhorn if you want to play efficiently, which is often the case if your pugs die on you. If you have a strong team with roles covered, you can get away with more, but if you don't-- you'll need to cover the bases yourself.


  • Unbelievabletekkers aime ceci

#16
Sir Perkins

Sir Perkins
  • Members
  • 184 messages
Welcome to the Reaver / Hakkon club! With modest stats currently @ 36 31 36 have completed NM runs with reaver from lvl 15 but prefer 17+ for better durability by taking right tree passives down the middle like armor bonus, clear a path etc.. my go to build is rampage , dragon rage , warhorn, combat roll. .. have had hakkon 2h for a few weeks now n didn't play Reaver much before that ..... as my experience n promotes increase am starting to replace one superb HoK for crit chance and relying more on dragon rage/rampage crit cooldown passives with warhorn to regenerate health , use superb stamulat and superb health belt ofcourse.. eventually I might get to use these superb crit damage bonus rings sitting in my inventory for donkeys...

Modifié par Sir Perkins, 17 août 2015 - 02:06 .

  • Unbelievabletekkers aime ceci

#17
Unbelievabletekkers

Unbelievabletekkers
  • Members
  • 216 messages

I know right I'm 47/35/36 and as long as there is a Lego I feel comfortsble, in fact good call on Combat Roll, it turns you into a super-fast ninja warrior.  I found it to be awesome :)  Is it worth upgrading or purely as is for dodging/escaping/closing gaps...?



#18
Yallegro

Yallegro
  • Members
  • 617 messages

If you don't upgrade you can't recover from stun/knockdown/panic



#19
FatCatTrap

FatCatTrap
  • Members
  • 15 messages

I don't think i've ever played the reaver without combat roll. How do you recover from terrors knocking you down continuously?

 

Agreed, I play with a similar build to yours OP, but with combat roll instead of ring of pain. I've tried the warhornwagon but it's not for me.


  • Unbelievabletekkers aime ceci

#20
Archaeologist

Archaeologist
  • Members
  • 90 messages

Ring.Of.Pain. BRING IT



#21
Cirvante

Cirvante
  • Members
  • 4 067 messages

Build is crap, but you know that already.