Ok, my apologies, Elcor banker was uncalled for.
On playing that "uncharted galaxy" card: Meaning what, the protagonist will be discovering fresh new land and setting up camps from scratch? Surely not. So, what's the big deal with "uncharted galaxy"?
I bet even Andromeda will start off with an existing balance of power, wherever we'll go, there'll be something there that someone before us has already built, that makes it worth having a fight there.
Andromeda is just as uncharted as of ME4 as Mars was uncharted up until ME3, i.e players had not had a mission there before.
So, What's with all that "uncharted galaxy" business as being somehow a 'perfect' reason to bring in customizable race?
You're mostly agreeing with me, and I'm mostly agreeing with you, I think. I don't want them to change the gameplay, but at the same time there's no reason why shooter gameplay would be incompatible with playing all sorts of origins - scouts, archeologists, academics, what have you. If Indiana Jones doesn't stretch credibility as a swashbuckling college professor, then a swashbuckling astrobiologist exploring a new galaxy shouldn't either. Uncharted was a bad choice of words, I obviously know that there's already folks there.
As for it being a good time to introduce such a thing - it's come up in the thread already, but the original trilogy was human centric - and justifiably so (although I won't opine on how that turned out, since I'm still pretty sour on it). But there's no reason for that to be the main focus in this new chapter, unless this ark project or whatever was a human endeavor and not jointly developed with the council and other species (and if that's the case, well, that will be incredibly disappointing).
They can add more reactivity, although in this setting (as I understand it, at least) I don't think it would be a factor as much as it is in Thedas. Even with minimal reactivity though, I thought the option to play as other races in DAI was really important. It's still a better game for it.
And I don't see what the purpose is in trashing the idea and yelling about how it would never work when there's no basis for thinking that.