43 réponses à ce sujet

[lynroy]

I know.

Let me borrow this.

 

Clearly, Morrigan survives a small stab wound to the abdomen. It wasn't a fatal blow.

[Serza]

Let me borrow this.

 

Lyn's going Tacti-cool!

 

I approve!

[ladyofpayne]

 

 

Clearly, Morrigan survives a small stab wound to the abdomen. It wasn't a fatal blow.

She needed a surgeon to survive this. But it doesn't matter really: Oghre and Leliana can be killed but they came back. I really hope they make this for Michel.

[fhs33721]

She needed a surgeon to survive this. But it doesn't matter really: Oghre and Leliana can be killed but they came back. I really hope they make this for Michel.

 

She did? For a single apparently not leathal stab-wound? As a mage? In a setting in which healing magic is real?

[Bad King]

I suppose I'm one of the few who really, truly dislikes Michel?

 

He's half elven, and hated his elven heritage so badly that he willingly killed elves in cold blood.  Young, old... no matter.  That's murder.  And he did so only to gain power and prestige for himself.  I guess people are impressed by his ability to keep a promise, but even if I didn't play elves, I wouldn't trust the guy enough to wish him in my party.

 

He might or might not be a companion in DA4, if there is a DA4 (which let us hope there will be), but personally I don't want him to be.  I'd rather have Neria, the Keeper from multiplayer--and I don't care for her much either.

 

He was also rather arrogant and moronic to think that he could outsmart a powerful demon (which was bound for a reason) and it led to the deaths of who knows how many people.

[HeyYouBase]

I never read Masked Empire, but in Inquisition he's kind of unimpressive, I had to save him from a couple of measly wolves the first time I met him.

[thats1evildude]

Michel is actually unkillable. The baddies can drop him down to his last hit point and that's it. The only way he can die is to be killed by Imshael.

[HeyYouBase]

Michel is actually unkillable. The baddies can drop him down to his last hit point and that's it. The only way he can die is to be killed by Imshael.

Huh, never knew that. Maybe he is a badass after all!

[Rekkampum]

 

She did? For a single apparently not leathal stab-wound? As a mage? In a setting in which healing magic is real?

 

 

I'm sure she had some spare injury kits or a poultice to drink.

[ladyofpayne]

In new Interview Laidlaw says that we know more elven secrets. Yes, in DA 4 there is perfect opportunity for Michel to be our companion.

[Andraste_Reborn]

I'm pretty sure Michel doesn't know any elven secrets.

 

I think he's a neat character and would have been happy to have him as a companion and love interest, but I also think the ship sailed when Imshael was able to kill him depending on player choice. BioWare seem to have given up on bringing Dragon Age characters back from the dead after everyone complained about Leliana, which is probably why they've stopped letting us kill members of our inner circle altogether.

[ladyofpayne]

 

 

I'm pretty sure Michel doesn't know any elven secrets.

He knows about eluvian network and his ancestry is very intresting- he is elven blood.

[daveliam]

She needed a surgeon to survive this. But it doesn't matter really: Oghre and Leliana can be killed but they came back. I really hope they make this for Michel.

 

The devs have since stated that they are going to avoid bringing back characters who can be killed.  I'm not saying it's impossible, but I wouldn't hold my breath.  I think any character with a 'determinant' fate (alive or dead based on PC decisions) will almost certainly not be making an appearance as a companion or major NPC going forward.  I think it's part of the reason why none of the 12 major NPCS (companions and advisors) have confirmed deaths in DA:I.  It gives the authors leeway to use them again in the future.

[ladyofpayne]

[Arakat]

 

They reply almost every question about future content with "spoilers", even if the answer is no. So I wouldn't get my hopes up over this.

[berelinde]

They reply almost every question about future content with "spoilers", even if the answer is no. So I wouldn't get my hopes up over this.

No, it's definitely best not to allow optimism to overtake reason, but they have said "no" on occasion, too. I'm going to interpret that "Spoilers!" as "We are still in the early approval stages that there will even be a DA4, so it's a bit early to discuss who the followers will be, but we're aware that Ser Michel would be popular in certain quarters (and unpopular in others). Either that, or we've found a way to kill him off even if you managed to keep him alive but we don't want to ruin the surprise too early. You decide."

[daveliam]

I think that, in this case, "spoilers" simply means that any answer to that question (affirmative or negative) would constitute a spoiler and he's not having any of it.  It's certainly not confirmation that Michel is showing up in DA4. 

[Solas]

do not want

[d1ta]

He didn't show any regret killing elves despite being half elven.
Sure he needs to do that awful deed to graduate, but it's the lack of remorse/guilt that kinda rubs me the wrong way.

Edit: if BW feels that they MUST have a chevalier as a companion, I'd just rather that person be someone totally fresh and new. Though I'm not a fan of that particular Order. But it's BW's sandbox anyway, they make what they like.