And talking about how they're useless at it, and how they need to find new people to do their job for them. And then the Inquisitor realized no one had stabbed a map in a while, and did Cassandra a solid.
Nope. Not how I remember it. Source?
I remember them saying their people (AKA party members and staff) were known by Solas, so they need new people to help them. I saw that as an excuse for the Inquisitor to pick new party members in a sequel.
You know, I thought Orlais was bad, but the arl from Ferelden makes me like Orlais by comparison.
I really don't get it, or how Alistair permits this douchebag to go barking at me after I saved their precious town. It felt so contrived.
I don't like how Teagan was acting but I actually prefer Ferelden blunt and plainspoken attitude than duplicitous Orlais.
And talking about how they're useless at it, and how they need to find new people to do their job for them. And then the Inquisitor realized no one had stabbed a map in a while, and did Cassandra a solid.
You mean they said they needed help. Not that they needed to be replaced.
And then right after that, once again said that they were going to stop Solas.
I would rather prefer if my Inquisitor will die in a codex or something since now she is one of Mythal's minion.....
so she is far from be trustworthy she isn't even my Inquisitor anymore,she's Mythal inquisitor
Hey guys anyone thinks Sandal's dialogue in DA 2 is in reference to Solas and his now mission to tear down the veil and release the old elven gods ::
One day the magic will come back - all of it. Everyone will be just like they were. The shadows will part and the skies will open wide. When he rises, everyone will see.
---------------------------------------
I completely forgot about that: great point. Certainly points directly to Solas. It still saddens me that Sandal was made into such a unique, mysterious character with tons of foreshadowing just to be forgotten about for the entirety of DA:I..
Pre-DAI I thought Sandal was referring to Corypheus...now it sounds like Solas. Maybe it is Solas, maybe it is someone we don't know yet? Time will tell.
Also, Sandal doesn't appear in DAI, but he does have a journal you can find in the Crossroads in Trespasser.
I am really upset that Bioware made my Inquisitor lose his arm. How is he going to be a 2H whirlwind-spinning Champion maniac now with walking fortress?
If it was an effort to make him more of a tragic hero, then it's done in poor taste.
Hey guys anyone thinks Sandal's dialogue in DA 2 is in reference to Solas and his now mission to tear down the veil and release the old elven gods ::
One day the magic will come back - all of it. Everyone will be just like they were. The shadows will part and the skies will open wide. When he rises, everyone will see.
---------------------------------------
I completely forgot about that: great point. Certainly points directly to Solas. It still saddens me that Sandal was made into such a unique, mysterious character with tons of foreshadowing just to be forgotten about for the entirety of DA:I..
Actually according to David Gaider told they made Sandal as joke character and surprised a lot off people think he is something more. We need shop just befor last battle so they just put sandal and make joke dead darkspown everywhere. . I hope they change it because I really like Sandal, and hope he is something important related to Titans.
i am so tempted to make a character named Cherry Darling now just for crossbow arm....
Actually according to David Gaider told they made Sandal as joke character and surprised a lot off people think he is something more. We need shop just befor last battle so they just put sandal and make joke dead darkspown everywhere. . I hope they change it because I really like Sandal, and hope he is something important related to Titans.
I don't think my Inquisitor missing her arm would be too much of a problem combat wise. She's a knight enchanter, but I reckon something could be done about the sword arm, or something.
I just want my Adaar and Iron Bull to have Qunari babies!
Loving these theories and opinions. I personally would love to see my Inquisitor in the next game, as I feel she does need to be the one to confront Solas because any other character just won't know Solas as well as her. It's time for retain the same character again Bioware, I love my Adaar and I want to play her again - arm or no arm.
I don't like how Teagan was acting but I actually prefer Ferelden blunt and plainspoken attitude than duplicitous Orlais.
Orlais is playing it cool with you. They think they can control you and the Inquisition. They'll give you an inch and then take a mile behind your back. Subterfuge is the name of the game with them.
i wonder will the Inquisitor makes an appearance in DA4 to allow the player to kill them like they can kill Hawke in DAI?
i wonder will the Inquisitor makes an appearance in DA4 to allow the player to kill them like they can kill Hawke in DAI?
I'd really rather that they didn't, honestly, for a couple of reasons. The way it was done in Inquisition was rather clumsy, and since we will presumably not be playing the Inquisitor, I don't much care for the idea of choosing as the new PC at all and I don't want to rehash that whole thing.
I believe that the anchor is gone, because it formed on the spot where the orb made connection to inquisitor's hand. It was connected to her/him and from there it gained power I think. So when Solas turned the inquisitor's hand in to stone so she/he could cut it off, the anchor ceased to function, that was obvious when Solas turned the inquisitor's hand to stone, I saw the surprise and relief on my lavellan's face, I might be imagining it, but Bioware has done a great job on facial expressions and voice acting, therefore, in my opinion, the moment Solas cast his spell on the arm, the inquisitor realized that the anchor has stopped spreading, after all she/he told the advisers that they didn't have much time, so they knew what was happening to them and how the the anchor's condition was like.
But I for one am glad that the anchor is gone even though it costed my lavellan's forearm. I was so mortified to think of the possibility of her dying, I literally didn't want to go on with the DLC XD
..........i just had an awful thought. what if solas was lying? what if he just wanted the anchor for himself? especially now that the orb was ruined, he may need that anchor to do his Veil business. just the way he apparently took mythal's...essence, or whatever it was. he needs the power for his plans. what if he was the one somehow causing the the anchor to become so unstable? so you would willingly, even gratefully, allow him to take it.
he was after that orb the whole time. when that was destroyed, he left. with no orb, he needs the power of the anchor to help him manipulate the Veil.
not to mention that he sure as heck would not want an Inquisitor with that kind of power running around able to thwart his plans.
edit: and it was the removal of the anchor that actually damaged the arm so severely
btw, if Dorian/Blackwall/Sera/Cole left you at in DAI, will they appear in trespasser?
I'm actually wondering about this, because I didn't get that "no direct involvement" thing from my ending. I'm wondering, did you disband the Inquisition or keep it as part of another organization (like the Chantry)? I disbanded it and while it did seem like the loss of potential material resources would hinder the remaining (much smaller) group supporting the Quizzy, they seemed pretty adamant about directly dealing with Solas.
I mean I could be remembering it wrong, but it would seem to me that it would make sense for a still remaining Inquisition to be a little less hands on when dealing with Solas due to the known spies (from multiple organizations, including Solas') that have infiltrated their ranks ... and not having any surefire way of getting rid of all of them. In contrast, if you chose to disband, it does seem that the Inquisitor and their few remaining allies are allowed a lot more free range in their pursuit, to the point where the game seems to at least imply that they themselves are planning on chasing him (to some capacity) and it was only a matter of finding a place they can prepare out of sight for a little while, in order to prepare.
As for the whole tech thing, while it didn't really show up in this game ... with the magical stuff that has been introduced to us (especially in the Descent DLC) there really isn't a reason to think that the Inquisitor couldn't acquire a viable prosthetic ... especially when they have access to Bianca and Dagna.
I disbanded when I realized how spies had infiltrated the ranks of inquisition even though I was mortified to let the order go but it was for the best, I think working underground would give the inquisitor and her team better advantage to purse Solas. And with all the magical and technical advancements, I'm sure they will find a way to grow inquisitor's forearm back.
btw, if Dorian/Blackwall/Sera/Cole left you at in DAI, will they appear in trespasser?
Dorian I believe does.
Sera I hear shows up i Vivienne's "spa day" scenes as usual, but that's it.
I am really upset that Bioware made my Inquisitor lose his arm. How is he going to be a 2H whirlwind-spinning Champion maniac now with walking fortress?
If it was an effort to make him more of a tragic hero, then it's done in poor taste.
All it means is the Inquisitor can't lead from the front lines anymore. HE or she can still lead the Inquisition and operate from the shadows. the job's still there, the focus just shifts.
Beats becoming a faceless torso any day of the week.
Actually according to David Gaider told they made Sandal as joke character and surprised a lot off people think he is something more. We need shop just befor last battle so they just put sandal and make joke dead darkspown everywhere. . I hope they change it because I really like Sandal, and hope he is something important related to Titans.
This is true. However, the "prophecy" is also true. It was an easter egg about things to come, phrased in the vaguest way possible. So it is possible it may refer to Solas and the Veil. Or maybe something else we haven't heard of yet.
If pressed the Inquisitor can still put a fight. Dagger Rogues and Greatsword Warriors will of course need to respec but they can still get back into battle.
A Rogue Inquisitor can have a mechanical Crossbow Arm built by Varric's girlfriend Bianca and if needed can use a dagger in one hand to ward off an immediate attacker.
A Warrior Inquisitor can go at it like Jaime Lannister and use his or her bad arm for an attached shield or buckler whilst using a normal weapon in their good arm.
A Mage Inquisitor may have it easiest of all because he or she should still be able to cast all of the spells they know and could have a staff holder attached to their bad arm to help channel the needed power.
This will of course be far harder for a left handed Inquisitor (was it ever established which was dominant?) and as mentioned before, the Inquisitor would be better situated to a position of command where he or she can coordinate the needed efforts against our next foes.
This will of course be far harder for a left handed Inquisitor (was it ever established which was dominant?) and as mentioned before, the Inquisitor would be better situated to a position of command where he or she can coordinate the needed efforts against our next foes.
I always assumed that the mage was right handed because this is the side the staff is held. Only Knight-Enchanters do anything with the left because of the spirit blade.
I think that the Inquisitor could have a prosthetic arm powered Lyrim/Blood Magic and you could also add the crystals Shale had in Dragon Age Origins.
I am really upset that Bioware made my Inquisitor lose his arm. How is he going to be a 2H whirlwind-spinning Champion maniac now with walking fortress?
If it was an effort to make him more of a tragic hero, then it's done in poor taste.
A reference to Rand al Thor?
Retour en haut