And.... The Hero and Alistair are both Wardens, acting on the Warden treaties specifically drafted by the Wardens in the event of a Blight, which requires a Warden to finish.
See where I'm going with this?
"But... they're not True Scotsmen-- I mean, Wardens!"
Yeah, denying the HoF's status as a Warden is pretty much Intellectual Dishonesty 101.
THIS
During that scene, I wanted to recruit CAUTHRIEN. You've seen how much of a fighter she was AND you know she can be reasonable and given that you spare Loghain's life, she would've been the frist to offer herself as a potential Warden....
I'm not adverse yo keeping Loghain alive but making him a warden? WHY?
Cauthrien of the Grey has a nice ring to it, don't you think? And I could definitely see her trying to find some way to atone for standing by Loghain during his tyranny. Her joining the Wardens doesn't sound too far-fetched, does it?
Considering that a Blight was underway and the sole purpose of the Warden's continued existence is to combat future Blights, I think it's safe to say that Alistair and the Hero were working with the Wardens' interests in mind.
You also act like Alistair and the Hero were totally alone. There was also Duncan before his death and Riordan, plus the Orlesian Wardens whom Loghain denied entry into Ferelden. I like to think that maybe Alistair's and the Hero's actions aren't so out of place when all of these other people are either actively or attempting to do them too.
Also, good job comparing the Empire, an organization that is unambiguously lawful "evil" as a whole with little to no redeeming qualities whatsoever, to the Wardens, who have been depicted as chaotic neutral at their lowest showings.
Very well said.
Just an advice, Shadow, TKS will disregard any argument that is not his own and seemingly loves to have the last word, so, it's up to you end the wall post here.
Yeah, you might as well be arguing with a brick wall. Just save yourself the hassle and don't bother.
Getting back to the topic at hand, what bothers me the most about Teagan's condemnation of the Wardens is not so much the nature of that condemnation, or even that it's totally out of character for Teagan to demonize the people who saved his ass all those years ago, but instead that it's more a microcosm of the slipshod and arbitrary nature of Bioware's characterization these days. Too often, how a character is written doesn't feel like it's being driven by their actual personality/values/backstory/ideals/etc, but by what's most convenient to the demands of the narrative. Teagan's using the Wardens as a bludgeon against the Inquisition because the plot says so, not because it makes any sense in the context of the setting or of who he is.
It's really no different than having Anders go from a self-interested, snarky ladies' man in Awakening to an angst-ridden terrorist jerk in DAII in order to facilitate the conflict there, or Fiona going from a mage rights firebrand who'd fight tooth and nail for her people's freedom to an idiot meekly shackling herself to Tevinter's wagon train; the plot demands a character act this way, and so that's the way they must act. Bioware's basically trying to hammer round pegs into square holes, how it looks, if it's effective or if it makes any sense be damned, and that's pretty much the opposite of effective characterization. It certainly doesn't help the characters feel any more engaging: why get attached to someone who's just going to turn evil/stupid/corrupt the moment the designers write themselves into a corner?