How many of these "bad pug" war stories are down to genuinely out-of-their-depth players; and how many are, in truth, perfectly competent players who simply score low because they just can't keep up with the top-tier players around here?
When I'm playing in a game with a top-tier BSNer or two, the scoreboard can end up looking like the "bad pug" screenshots that some of you like to post; but the top-tier players don't expect me to keep up with them, and don't mock me for failing to do so. I contribute what I can and (hopefully) have fun doing so.
(When I'm in a game without top-tier players, the board tends to look a bit more even, assuming we even manage to extract without a competent person in the mix
)
When put next to you guys, anyone who isn't one of you guys is going to look bad.
I know for a fact some posters complain about PUGs being bad simply because they scored x amount higher than they did. I've only got an issue when they don't do the objectives, and don't gel. I don't have an issue as long as you're actually trying.





Retour en haut







