And the option to let her decide for herself was there for a reason. Freedom of choice should not be violated, even if consequences would be for the greater good.
She decides to get the treatment. So telling her to get it or letting her choose on her own still comes to the same set up. So your argument is based on the illusion of choice.
the final sentence I'm not sure if it is a joke or you just don't understand what you are saying. Freedom of choice gets violated all the time both for greater good and not so good. Your statement is literally saying it is ok for someone to kill someone else because it was a decision they made all on their own. And their actions shouldn't be restricted or punished because it would be violating it even though it would be for the greater good.
I mean I know I have a very cynical out look on life but sweet Elder Jas I never justified mass murders before.





Retour en haut





