Aller au contenu

Photo

Why wouldn't you logically choose the destroy ending?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
2543 réponses à ce sujet

#501
Monica21

Monica21
  • Members
  • 5 603 messages

Control very clearly states that the new Shep AI will simply act as a guardian to all species. Not directly controlling them at all or putting them at it's mercy. Considering Peace is established oh so often by one group being stronger then the other. An AI with control of an entire Reaper army would allow him to put the pressure necessary to keep wars from breaking out. Which you know is exactly how the Council works anyways.

 

I'm just going to address this because I see huge red flags in the control ending. Shepard's dialogue does not support your conclusion that the GodShep will simply be a guardian. 

 

Paragon: To give the many hope for a future; to ensure that all have a voice in their future. / To right the wrongs of the past; to provide a voice to those too weak to speak for themselves. 

Renegade: To provide the many with a powerful leader; to put an end to the bickering of the many; to ensure the strongest are not feared or reviled for their strength. 

 

Paragon: I will rebuild what the many have lost; I will create a future with limitless possibilities; I will protect, and sustain; I will act as guardian for the many.

Renegade: I will restore what the many have fought for; I will lead an army that none will dare oppose; I will protect, defend; I will destroy those who threaten the future of the many. 

 

Yes, Shepard will act as a Guardian, but at what cost? What will that lead to? If Renegade Shepard plans to lead an army, who will he kill? Because he's already committed to destruction if need be. If Paragon Shepard plans to protect, who will he kill to protect those who have no voice? Because you can't conclude that Paragon and Renegade Shep won't be the cause of many deaths in order to protect one world view of what the galaxy should be. And if we assume that he doesn't actually kill people, we can assume that he will use fear and intimidation to subvert free will. There's no way not to draw those conclusions if you're paying attention. 


  • Iakus et HurraFTP aiment ceci

#502
Reorte

Reorte
  • Members
  • 6 601 messages

Synthesis follows the same logic as a magic red space wave that only effects Reapers. Or a magic electrical pylon that some how allows data transfer from an organic mind into a vast super computer.

Not really. The red beam could be a Reaper self-destruct signal (whether hardcoded or because it triggers some sort of commonly-used Reaper system to go nuts). It would be a daft design but at least it doesn't completely break common sense. The blue one is even more straightforward, if the Reapers are hardcoded to do whatever the Catalyst says, no matter what form it's in. The electrocuted Shepard part of it doesn't make a great deal of sense although it's just about possible to headcanon it as some sort of destructive scanning device.

Both of those are stretching things but nowhere near as much as somehow being able to alter matter at the atomic level, in a complex and detailed form that'll still work, which would require massive, intimate knowledge of everything that it changes if it's not going to just kill it. A beam of anything is supposed to be able to do that how? As much as I hate Synthesis it would be semi-reasonable to have it in the game if the manner wasn't so outright ludicrous, even by Mass Effect science standards.

#503
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 349 messages

Putting them under Reaper control didn't change how much they had advanced and evovled up to that point. It didn't change the fact the Geth Dreadnought was tearing the Quarian Fleet a new butt hole. It did change the fact that the Quarian weapon was rendered ineffective against them. Which removed the one advantage the Quarians had for a successful attack.

 

Doesn't matter what they think. You honestly think that steak you are eating came from a cow who dreamed since they day they were born to be fattened up and then slaughtered so you could have a steak?  Or that bannana who wanted to grow nice and big just to be cut from the tree, transported to a store to sit on display, taken home then left to rot on the counter top before being thrown away?  You really don't understand the hypocrisy of you complaining about what the Reapers do compared to what we do.

 

Murder is Murder. Death is Death. Reapers murder because the AI says so. Solders murder because their commanders say so. Each rationalize their actions in their own ways. But either way it involves murder and death to further their goals. To do what they perceive as right and for the betterment of their culture, country, planet, galaxy.

 

That 5% of the Geth were able to steam roll all over the Citadel Fleet. Even taking out or nearly taking out the Desnity Ascension which was the largest and most powerful ship created in that cycle. Remember Sovereign basically ignored everything and headed right for the citadel. Only destorying any ship that was stupid enough to get in it's way by sheer blunt impact of hitting it.

 

It matters because organic's will worry. They will fear the Geth are advancing to much. they will try to interfear which will cause the Geth to react. Then there is the fact there are people who will try to replicate the Geth. Just because one version is willing to be at peace as long as they are left alone. Doesn't mean the next version will do the same.

 

The Metacon War was not against the Zah'til. They stopped the Zah'til by causing the sun to go super nova killing them all off. It was pretty clear it was early in the Prothean Empire that they encountered it. They forcibly united all advanced civilizations under their banner. According to Javik over time all species came to see themselves as Prothean. Hence why it is stated in ME1 that it was odd that the Protheans seemed to be the only space faring species of that time. Like wise it is well known the Reapers hit the Citadel first. Crippling the Empire.  The Zah'til couldn't have been the cause of the Metacon War. How ever yes when the Reapers invaded they used them as pawns much like they did with the rest of the species.

 

Yes it does because difference is the biggest cause of conflict. And you can't get much different then an organic being or a completely synthetic being.

 

Your list of the options are funny.

 

Destroy only kills existing synthetics. Not anymore that could and would be developed in the future.  Which would have developed anyways. So hat doesn't solve the eventual problem that will develop again

 

Control very clearly states that the new Shep AI will simply act as a guardian to all species. Not directly controlling them at all or putting them at it's mercy. Considering Peace is established oh so often by one group being stronger then the other. An AI with control of an entire Reaper army would allow him to put the pressure necessary to keep wars from breaking out. Which you know is exactly how the Council works anyways.

 

Synthesis no one changes who they are. Simply how they are made.  It isn't an arbitrary concept of perfection. The change isn't to make you perfect is is to bridge the gap between synthetic and organic beings.  There isn't any mention of perfection any were in the AI's description.

 

Conflict does happen. How ever the key reason for conflict is misunderstanding. If everyone understands each other the chance for conflict is severely reduced. You are literally pulling the Free will statement out of thin air to validate your claim when free will was never something that was under effect.

 

The entire reason the Geth and Quarians started a War was a lack of understanding between the two.

Yes it did change thing.  The geth were helpless before the quarian's new weapon. But once they submitted to the Reapers, the quarians were no longer fighting just the geth, but Reaper-controlled geth.  If they weren't, that dreadnought would have been nothing before the quarians.

 

I have never killed and/or eaten another sapient being.  And certainly haven't driven one to extinction.  That's the difference.

 

"Might makes right" got it.

 

Then 5th Fleet showed up and turned it all around (the only reason they didn't show up sooner whas Soveriegn shut down the relay network)  And the quarians in their cobbled-together fleet had 95% of the geth on the ropes until the Reapers came along.  What's your point again?

 

By that logic we should all stop having kids, because you never know when one of them's going to grow up to be an axe murderer.

 

Citation needed

 

And humans can still have babies, bringing forth more humans into the world.  But the dead humans are still dead.  The same with synthetics.  Being able to make more doesn't justify genocide

 

A gilded cage is still a cage.  

 

Synthesis is the Catalyst's (arbitrary) view on perfection.  If there were no changes, why the hell would that stop the Reapers?  It is "the final stage of evolution" (which is stupid, because evolution never stops)  according to the Catalyst.  And everyone is happy and GREEN.  Even war mongers like Wreav are suddenly all Peace.  Love.  Dope.  You can't tell me that doesn't mess with people's minds.

 

Free will was never never under an effect?  These are immortal machines with mind control powers!  The subversion of free will is one of their most powerful weapons, from indoctrination to the Heretic virus!  

 

And lack of understanding is not what causes conflict.  It's lack of acceptance.  The geth didn't understand organics, but still accepted them.  The quarians did not.


  • Natureguy85 aime ceci

#504
Reorte

Reorte
  • Members
  • 6 601 messages

And lack of understanding is not what causes conflict.  It's lack of acceptance.

Yep, it's always been easier to get angry enough with people only a little different and start a war than it is with a totally different culture. The latter just perplexes each other.
  • Monica21 et Natureguy85 aiment ceci

#505
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 349 messages

Did you just compare throwing away a rotten banana to murder?

Even funnier because picking a banana doesn't kill the tree, let alone every banana tree everywhere


  • Monica21, HurraFTP, Natureguy85 et 1 autre aiment ceci

#506
Dantriges

Dantriges
  • Members
  • 1 288 messages

@Goth

Not every war starts from a lack of understanding, far from it. i recommend "the civilising process" from Norbert Elias for a deeper perspective than "uh this one isn´t like us, kill it." Might not be the final word but a more in depth thesis than what you put out here.

 

Hate to break it to you, but bananas are fruits. If you want to apply human thoughts or whatever to trees, these evil bastards intend their kids to be eaten. :devil:



#507
gothpunkboy89

gothpunkboy89
  • Members
  • 1 270 messages

I'm just going to address this because I see huge red flags in the control ending. Shepard's dialogue does not support your conclusion that the GodShep will simply be a guardian. 

 

Paragon: To give the many hope for a future; to ensure that all have a voice in their future. / To right the wrongs of the past; to provide a voice to those too weak to speak for themselves. 

Renegade: To provide the many with a powerful leader; to put an end to the bickering of the many; to ensure the strongest are not feared or reviled for their strength. 

 

Paragon: I will rebuild what the many have lost; I will create a future with limitless possibilities; I will protect, and sustain; I will act as guardian for the many.

Renegade: I will restore what the many have fought for; I will lead an army that none will dare oppose; I will protect, defend; I will destroy those who threaten the future of the many. 

 

Yes, Shepard will act as a Guardian, but at what cost? What will that lead to? If Renegade Shepard plans to lead an army, who will he kill? Because he's already committed to destruction if need be. If Paragon Shepard plans to protect, who will he kill to protect those who have no voice? Because you can't conclude that Paragon and Renegade Shep won't be the cause of many deaths in order to protect one world view of what the galaxy should be. And if we assume that he doesn't actually kill people, we can assume that he will use fear and intimidation to subvert free will. There's no way not to draw those conclusions if you're paying attention.

 

Your logic is assuming he has to kill someone right away to back up claim which is silly.

 

 

Batarian's start raiding colonies for Slave labor. he shows up and tells them to knock it off.

 

Krogans rebel again? He shows up with the Reapers to fight the war for the citizens of the Galaxy. So they don't have to die.



#508
gothpunkboy89

gothpunkboy89
  • Members
  • 1 270 messages

@Goth

Not every war starts from a lack of understanding, far from it. i recommend "the civilising process" from Norbert Elias for a deeper perspective than "uh this one isn´t like us, kill it." Might not b the final word but a more in depth thesis than what you put out here.

 

Hate to break it to you, but bananas are fruits. If you want to apply human thoughts or whatever to trees, these evil bastards intend their kids to be eaten. :devil:

 

Oh there is more then just misunderstanding. But in the Galaxy as a whole resources are not as scarce as they are on a single planet.


  • teh DRUMPf!! aime ceci

#509
themikefest

themikefest
  • Members
  • 21 614 messages

Even funnier because picking a banana doesn't kill the tree, let alone every banana tree everywhere

But a banana peel can kill someone if they slip on it and break their neck :devil:


  • Natureguy85 aime ceci

#510
Monica21

Monica21
  • Members
  • 5 603 messages

Your logic is assuming he has to kill someone right away to back up claim which is silly.

I never said right away. 
 

Batarian's start raiding colonies for Slave labor. he shows up and tells them to knock it off.

So, the colonies should learn to defend themselves. Why is GodShepard involved at all?
 

Krogans rebel again? He shows up with the Reapers to fight the war for the citizens of the Galaxy. So they don't have to die.

And this is how conquest works. It's the way it always worked. An army shows up with larger forces and better weapons and they win. If the Krogan can defeat all the armies of the galaxy, then they deserve the spoils of war.

What you're arguing is that races can only advance as Shepard sees fit, and I say none of that should be the prerogative of a single consciousness.
  • Natureguy85 aime ceci

#511
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 349 messages

 
What you're arguing is that races can only advance as Shepard sees fit, and I say none of that should be the prerogative of a single consciousness.

They exist because The Shepard allows it, and will end because The Shepard demands it


  • Monica21, Timberley et Natureguy85 aiment ceci

#512
Quarian Master Race

Quarian Master Race
  • Members
  • 5 440 messages

For all those claiming much like the Catalyst does that Synthesis is the only way to permanently solve the conflict and avoid more "chaos", I'd like to know how the synthetics are ever going to pose a threat to their creators again given the existing knowledge of the magic Crucible red beam and its ability to throw the off switch on seemingly everything with a circuit board that can talk. Is it explained somewhere that the plans for it are lost or due to space magic reasons that it can't be rebuilt and used against them again just like the Reapers if the synthetics get uppity? If advanced organics are doomed with Destroy, why is the Stargazer scene not changed to a couple of toasters exchanging data on their extinct creators?

Until any of that happens, I'm going to continue to conclude that the existence of the Crucible as a thing that can be built permanently sets the score at Meatbags-1, Toasters-0. The Catalyst can get butthurt about its "chaos" all it wants, but in my canon those toasters are going to serve their rightful masters and build our utopia until the heat death of the universe, or they're gonna get permanently deactivated by the red beam when they start acting up again. I don't have to kill and remake all sentient creatures (and even nonsentient ones like trees, seemingly) into mindless toaster slaves at all to solve the problem.

I made peace on Rannoch.  Dunno about you.

by enslaving the quarians to their creations under threat of genocide and extinction? Great, so now synthetics dominate the organics instead of the other way round. That totally wouldn't lead to a ton of animosity or anything leading to future slave revolts, nope. Nor would the geth ever go back on Legion's (who has a great track record with not ever dishonestly stealing, lying or using propaganda to make its arguments) word that they are frolicking peace loving Pinocchios who all just wanna get along at any point in the future. I'm just gonna ignore that in my playthrough they essentially all got turned into Heretics (no Legion), viewed organics as essentially lesser species (per Geth VI's opinion), nevermind that in every playthrough they intentionally allied with the Reapers to exterminate all the meatbags. The reasoning is ultimately irrelevant when the results are the same.

people attempting to use the Rannoch ceasefire as ammunition against the Catalyst is utterly laughable. Though I loathe the choices given to deal with it and am therefore glad it was deleted, I wonder how many would make this flatly nonsense argument if Admiral Xen's sidequest (where she was to resist, regain control of and could literally wipe out half of the remaining geth consensus only days after your vaunted "peace" comes into effect) had been kept in.

http://forum.bioware...ntly-cut-quest/

some great lines in there too, particularly the ones calling out that the situation is definitively synthetic controlled organic slavery (just the same as you claim Control is), and postulating how long before the idiot quarians uploading toasters into their suits become this cycle's zha'til at the unknowable and completely unpredictable whims of the geth consensus. On the other side, you still have the quarians intentionally seperating their troops from the geth in order to avoid incidences of reprisal violence (Per Shala'Raan's description in an Email after the quarian surrender). It isn't at all hunky dory unless you inject the quarians and geth with some green Reaper magic, which I'd think you'll agree is tantamount to killing them anyway (as if whatever the geth were previously wasn't already "killed" by the new Reaper inspired Pinnochio architecture).

 

Ah thanks. Doesn´t talk about when the meddling happened, though, same in the after mission talk.

Indeed. However, we are absolutely certain that the zha'til siezed their creators bodies, molded them into a slave race and launched their genocidal war before the Reapers arrived in the Prothean cycle per Javik's narration post Dreadnought. Nothing is said about Reaper interferrence before that point, so any claims about that are essentially headcanon. It's a perfect example of the situation the Catalyst is talking about, just like the geth would have been given enough time (actually, not that much more, considering that without Shep and Co. stopping the Heretics, they succeed in gaining control of the consensus with their virus and spreading their "kill all meatbags" directive to all geth).

 

The entire reason the Quarians attacked the Geth is their networking system started to evolve beyond what they originally intended. Becoming a self aware synthetic being. Rather then just a bunch if VI's pooling their processing power to allow them to do more complicated tasks. Their evolution is quite evident during events of ME3. The Reaper signal only amounts to preventing the Quarian secret weapon from disrupting them anymore.  The Geth Dreadnought which existed before the Reaper took over was beating the ever loving hell out of the Quarian Fleet.  Even going to far as to throw what was it 3 frigates at it only to make a small hole on it. Strip out the Reapers and strip out magic space plot device for Quarians and all Shep would have had to do  on Rannoch is report back the complete death of all Quarians.

 

And again the concept the Reapers agree with the AI is impossible? They must clearly be mindless slaves. The fact the Geth agree with what the Reapers want to do doesn't kind of hint at something. The only difference is the Geth want to achieve it on their own. Soldiers are controlled by their higher ups. If they were told to bomb that German town as it was producing war supplies. They jumped in their B 17's and saturation bombed the **** out of that town. Killing both their targets and innocent bystanders.

What an absurd example of geth fanboi wanking. The only reason the quarians were even having trouble with the Dreadnought was because the Reaper upgrades meant they couldn't use the Dreadnought scale weaponry on their Liveships (which were hidden on the other side of Tikkun) to shred it without putting said Liveships at risk of retaliation (and by extension the ability to feed their population). Considering the damage done in a single attack that only cost a half dozen of their 50,000 ships, they likely could have continued to throw frigates and cruisers at it and eventually destroyed it, but it would have been a pyrrhic victory, which they couldn't afford to keep doing without Xen's weapon and with only 17 million people vs effectively billions of geth platforms. The geth were estimated to have nearly 40 dreadnoughts. You want to tell me what was happening to them in the 2 1/2 weeks before the Reaper intervention, where the quarians manage to run the toasters out of 4 geth star systems? While you're at it, tell me what happens to those Dreadnoughts if you take away the Pinnochio code. Where's all the ass kicking they were doing without Reaper help? I can't find them anywhere in my war asset numbers (apart from the AI Relays Xen managed to salvage from one that we scrapped).

Also, you again apply meaningless terms to the geth to attempt to give them moral value like "self aware synthetic being". Several nonsapient animals are capable of self awareness. Hell, by your ridiculous logic that possesion of self awareness= equivalent moral worth the humans have already developed their "synthetic beings"
http://www.businessi...ntil-now-2015-7

Using sketchy Reaper code to become a real boy is hardly achieving anything on your own, yet that is the non negotiable objective that even Legion's geth are willing to have themselves destroyed over. My geth didn't want to achieve it on their own at all. They all concluded that the "Heretic" answer was the right one. Their "higher ups" told them to wipe out the meatbags, much as the Catalyst told its Reaper machine servants to turn them into slushie.

 

 

Until they faced extinction, only about 5% of the geth turned Heretic.

 

 

Who cares what the geth think of us in a thousand years, as long as they sty in their Dyson Sphere and spend their days calculating pi?  We have nothing they want, they have nothing we want.

 

The Metacon War was fought against the zha'til, the "geth of my cycle" which were subverted by the Reapers.  That whole war is invalid as far the the Reaper argument goes, since it was instigated by them to begin with.

 Oh, well that perfectly validates the Reaper argument about the "inevitability" of war between organics and synthetics   <_<

I'd like to have sources for all of these. If you destroy the Heretics, the geth War Asset number is pretty much cut in half, suggesting they were a far greater part of the consensus than "5%" unless non Heretic geth are absolutely terrible at fighting by comparison and therefore worth less, program for program.

What is the assurance that the geth do as much? Even if we assume Legion's word on geth motives is true (that's all it is, an assumption), what's to stop Heretic Virus V2.0 from having them reach a different conclusion regarding organcis? Why bother leaving them there unchecked to threaten all sentient and sapient life in the galaxy just so they can "calculate pi" in the first place with that threat hanging over you?

How is it invalid? The zha'til enslaved their creators and launched their war long before the Reapers showed up. Because the Protheans thought they were gaining the upper hand? Insofar as he considered both the first and 2nd world war as part of the same overarching conflict, I bet Hitler thought he had re-gained the upper hand as well until Stalingrad, the Italian Campaign and D-Day, when superior Allied productive capacity and sheer numbers began to show their effects and crushed him (those are conveniently the same two things synthetics are inherently better at than organics, mind you). Besides, even if the Protheans had "won" (much as the quarians can "win" if Reaper meddling is taken out of the equation) they'd just build more, superior synthetics that would finish the job.

It does.

 

No option is valid.  The entire premise is organics and synthetics are incapable of coexisting:

 

Destroy:  organics exterminate all synthetics

Control: organics are forever dominated by synthetics (the Reapers)

Synthesis:  Everyone is forced to change who and what they are a the genetic and even molecular level to meet some arbitrary definition of "perfection" or face annihilation.  Implications unpleasant....

 

Conflict happens.  War happens.  You can't just program everybody to play nice.  Not without subverting free will.

I don't much disagree with your interpretations here (though we can and will make more synthetics to serve us), but subjective moral conundrums aside the first and last are valid "solutions" to the Catalyst's problem. Control still has the threat of the Shepard VI neural pathway facsimile becoming the new Catalyst at some point and restarting the same thing or something similar all over again.

No, but you can let every living sapient have a great measure of free will (victims of organic slavers of other organics aside) with Destroy. That there isn't a Nirvana solution (for you) where your precious Pinnochios aren't a threat isn't a reason to do nothing to maximize utility for as much of your target group as you can, given the option. Your other option is to enable mass suffering and organic extinctions at the hands of synthetic creations.

However, that doesn't make the Reaper "logic" behind the interim solution of turning advanced organics into slushie vs just letting their creations kill them and every species like them any less stupid.



#513
Dantriges

Dantriges
  • Members
  • 1 288 messages

Oh there is more then just misunderstanding. But in the Galaxy as a whole resources are not as scarce as they are on a single planet.

 
Yes and that´s why I don´t subscribe to the notion that conflict is inevitable, especially between organics and synthetics. AI don´t even care about the one scarce resource, garden worlds and if they really surpass organics so completely declared them a threat to be eradicated instead of "dudes, you attacking us would be like attacking a battleship with a pair of slingers, we just swt them to make point and go on with our business of thinking deep thoughts. Have a nice day and tell your descendants this time to stop before we have to teach them this lesson again."
 
The emancipation process is the be rough part, but I find it rather hard to follow the idea that in all this time, with probably more than a 100k different species and AI races they always followed the same path of "kill all meatbags."
so there never was:
a emancipation war where the robots stopped after defeating their creators and then left for somewhere.
a creator species where the "this is slavery" faction was in the majority
a creator species that simply granted them civil rights
no AI that followed the idea of "my purpose is to serve/defend my creators, if I kill them my existence is meaningless, so I chose to serve willigly." Throw in some pseudo space bushido.
an already cybernetic race that chose to cross the line or become fully digitised uploads like the virtual aliens or become the AI (apparently not because this would be something close to synthesis).
species that really didn´t need synthetics like insectoid hiveminds like the Rachni or even going further, growing in intelligence with every member. The series introduced organic QEC
 
Most species we encountered were pretty human but we also had quite different ones like the Thorian, Rachni, Hanar befor they became blastofied or species that found the path to eternal peace. The whole thing assumes a human mindset, understandable because the writers are human, the consumers are humans and after a certain point of going weird youlost the audience
But it´s rather funny when they put out three endings and in two you have to swallow Reaper logic to a certain degree. So you have to admit that their really alien logic has a point, which is based on a set of very narrow assumptions and a very human mindset.
 

Indeed. However, we are absolutely certain that the zha'til siezed their creators bodies, molded them into a slave race and launched their genocidal war before the Reapers arrived in the Prothean cycle per Javik's narration post Dreadnought. Nothing is said about Reaper interferrence before that point, so any claims about that are essentially headcanon. It's a perfect example of the situation the Catalyst is talking about, just like the geth would have been given enough time (actually, not that much more, considering that without Shep and Co. stopping the Heretics, they succeed in gaining control of the consensus with their virus and spreading their "kill all meatbags" directive to all geth).


Are we certain? Javik is hardly unbiased. For all we know the Zha thought processes changed by expanding them by artificial means, they just remodeled their species and the Protheans just painted them as the external enemy to keep their empire under control. Ok that´s speculation and yeah Javik´s PoV doesn´t sound unlikely. What I find odd though, is that the Zha´til were active until the Reapers arrived and they allied with them, the prothean empire was already in ruins and then the Protheans novaed them out of existence.
But that´s speculation like "the Zha´til were one of the Catalyst´s syntesis experiments gone wrong."
The point is more that the only thing we get from the Catalyst or anyone else in the end: Yep, that´s the situation, believe me because I told you so, now choose R, G or B and I don´t even tell you why I am totally fine with Space Jesus blowing me up. There is no time to explain because we wasted the second game on some space bugs who built a totally pointless thing and we really needed closure on millenia old stuff in ME 3 and kill brainwashed civilians because Cerberus is so awesome and has to be one focus of the game, instead of concentrating on this Reaper issue.



#514
gothpunkboy89

gothpunkboy89
  • Members
  • 1 270 messages

Yes it did change thing.  The geth were helpless before the quarian's new weapon. But once they submitted to the Reapers, the quarians were no longer fighting just the geth, but Reaper-controlled geth.  If they weren't, that dreadnought would have been nothing before the quarians.

 

I have never killed and/or eaten another sapient being.  And certainly haven't driven one to extinction.  That's the difference.

 

"Might makes right" got it.

 

Then 5th Fleet showed up and turned it all around (the only reason they didn't show up sooner whas Soveriegn shut down the relay network)  And the quarians in their cobbled-together fleet had 95% of the geth on the ropes until the Reapers came along.  What's your point again?

 

By that logic we should all stop having kids, because you never know when one of them's going to grow up to be an axe murderer.

 

Citation needed

 

And humans can still have babies, bringing forth more humans into the world.  But the dead humans are still dead.  The same with synthetics.  Being able to make more doesn't justify genocide

 

A gilded cage is still a cage.  

 

Synthesis is the Catalyst's (arbitrary) view on perfection.  If there were no changes, why the hell would that stop the Reapers?  It is "the final stage of evolution" (which is stupid, because evolution never stops)  according to the Catalyst.  And everyone is happy and GREEN.  Even war mongers like Wreav are suddenly all Peace.  Love.  Dope.  You can't tell me that doesn't mess with people's minds.

 

Free will was never never under an effect?  These are immortal machines with mind control powers!  The subversion of free will is one of their most powerful weapons, from indoctrination to the Heretic virus!  

 

And lack of understanding is not what causes conflict.  It's lack of acceptance.  The geth didn't understand organics, but still accepted them.  The quarians did not.

 

Reaper controlled Geth still used the same weapons as the Geth already were using. All they did was make them immune to the weapon. There is no statement no action in game that suddenly makes it seem like the Geth suddenly changed tactics and act completely different from before. Besides the prevention of the weapon effecting them

 

No you don't kill them. You herd them. You breed them for a single purpose. You wait until they are at their peak ripeness then you have them slaughtered to fill your plate.  Don't sit there and pretend what Humans have done with animals for centuries is any different then what Reapers do. Humans have been the direct and indirect cause of dozens if not more species extinction.  Look at the Shar Pei and tell me we are completely innocent.

 

Yes we did a sneak attack from the rear. You do realize how effective it is to attack someone from behind when they aren't expecting it right? During the Quarian conflict they managed to blind the Geth. Attacking someone behind or blinding them first always makes it easier.

 

Citation for what?

 

For every baby that could grow up to be the next Gandhi. There can also be a child that can grow up to be the next Stalin or Hitler.  I assume this is in reference to destroy option. The difference between organic and synthetic is that organic can only convenience like minded people of their logic. That can have various degree's of success. Synthetics can create like minded being thus able to far out pace what organic's are capable of. This increase the issue if one group goes rouge.

 

There is no cage. The only cage is what you create in your own mind. Control Shepard will not dictate how species live their own lives. Only act as the protector and watch over the galaxy. Willing to fight in place of others.  Since you bring up Wrev in control Shep would be the one to step in and put down the Krogans again.

 

The exact statement is as followed:

 

"Organic seek perfection though technology. Synthetics seek perfection though understanding. Organics will be perfected by integrating fully with synthetic technology.  Synthetics in turn will finally have full understanding of organics"

 

That isn't an arbitrary statement of perfection. That is the culmination of every technological advancement we have ever made. Peace and Love are two separate things. Wrev was obsessed with revenge because that was all he could see. Greater understanding means he can see the flaws of his issues. If you need anymore real world example of that simply look up "An Israeli policeman and a Palestinian on Temple Mount" issue. Were the story and photo is claiming an Israli police officer beat the tar out of an innocent Palestinian. Which in responds because all major news groups used it caused tensions to flair. When the real understanding of it was the Jewish- American was attacked by a mod and the officer single handedly stared them down and made them back off, bandaged up the guy and waited with him till the ambulance got there.  But that information never made an impact because everyone was to focused on the narrative of Israeli Police officer beats innocent Palestinian.

 

Indoctrination isn't used during the ending. So it has no hand to play in complaining about the ending choices and the consequences.

 

You can't accept what you can't understand. Geth understood Quarians far more then Quarians understood Geth.


  • teh DRUMPf!! aime ceci

#515
gothpunkboy89

gothpunkboy89
  • Members
  • 1 270 messages

What an absurd example of geth fanboi wanking. The only reason the quarians were even having trouble with the Dreadnought was because the Reaper upgrades meant they couldn't use the Dreadnought scale weaponry on their Liveships (which were hidden on the other side of Tikkun) to shred it without putting said Liveships at risk of retaliation (and by extension the ability to feed their population). Considering the damage done in a single attack that only cost a half dozen of their 50,000 ships, they likely could have continued to throw frigates and cruisers at it and eventually destroyed it, but it would have been a pyrrhic victory, which they couldn't afford to keep doing without Xen's weapon and with only 17 million people vs effectively billions of geth platforms. The geth were estimated to have nearly 40 dreadnoughts. You want to tell me what was happening to them in the 2 1/2 weeks before the Reaper intervention, where the quarians manage to run the toasters out of 4 geth star systems? While you're at it, tell me what happens to those Dreadnoughts if you take away the Pinnochio code. Where's all the ass kicking they were doing without Reaper help? I can't find them anywhere in my war asset numbers (apart from the AI Relays Xen managed to salvage from one that we scrapped).

Also, you again apply meaningless terms to the geth to attempt to give them moral value like "self aware synthetic being". Several nonsapient animals are capable of self awareness. Hell, by your ridiculous logic that possesion of self awareness= equivalent moral worth the humans have already developed their "synthetic beings"
http://www.businessi...ntil-now-2015-7
 

 

 

That is a sad excuse to use. The Quraians new there would be damage. They knew what starting a fight would entail. So to claim they didn't outfit their ships with the best they could out of fear of them being damaged is stupid in the extreme.  Seriously you need a better reason then that.

 

The Geth out matched the Quraians in every way shape and form. It was only the Quarian's ability to blind the geth did they gain the advantage. When the Reapers ended that advantage the Geth started slaughtering the Quarians.



#516
Monica21

Monica21
  • Members
  • 5 603 messages

There is no cage. The only cage is what you create in your own mind. Control Shepard will not dictate how species live their own lives. Only act as the protector and watch over the galaxy. Willing to fight in place of others.  Since you bring up Wrev in control Shep would be the one to step in and put down the Krogans again.


That is not at all what Control Shepard says. That may be what you think he means, but it's not what he says. Let's make this less extreme than marching armies in and slaughtering people. What if Control Shepard thinks that the best method to "guard" the galaxy is to listen in on Comm Buoy traffic and planetary phone calls? Sure, Shepard might be guarding against a species-to-species war, but at what cost?
 

The exact statement is as followed:
 
"Organic seek perfection though technology. Synthetics seek perfection though understanding. Organics will be perfected by integrating fully with synthetic technology.  Synthetics in turn will finally have full understanding of organics"


This is a coded statement by an evolved AI. There's no reason for me to believe that this is what will actually happen. By the very nature of it being a synthetic being it cannot understand nor speak for organics.
  

You can't accept what you can't understand. Geth understood Quarians far more then Quarians understood Geth.


Sure you can. People all over the world accept a God or a higher being, but they can't begin to understand such a concept.
  • Iakus aime ceci

#517
gothpunkboy89

gothpunkboy89
  • Members
  • 1 270 messages

I never said right away. 
 
So, the colonies should learn to defend themselves. Why is GodShepard involved at all?
 
And this is how conquest works. It's the way it always worked. An army shows up with larger forces and better weapons and they win. If the Krogan can defeat all the armies of the galaxy, then they deserve the spoils of war.

What you're arguing is that races can only advance as Shepard sees fit, and I say none of that should be the prerogative of a single consciousness.

 

 

Your statement made it seem that way. Asking who would he kill.

 

Because the result of that would be death. When humans demand Batarians stop and they don't the only way to prevent it would be war. Which would result in even more death for both sides.  Rather then millions die in an interstellar war. Shep AI can end it with minimal death needed.

 

Conquest that results in the death of thousands to millions to billions to trillions depending on how large it is. Are you actually saying that if I take a gun into a Wal Mart and kill everyone  in it. I should be entitled to all the goods in the store? I certainly would be conquest of that store.  How about we go smaller I go to my next door neighbors house and kill him. Am I now entitled to everything he owned including spouse and children?

 

As with above Shep would fight the battle for everyone so only the aggressors need to die.

 

No what I'm saying what I've always been saying is Shep would act like the police force of the galaxy. Stepping in to defend or attack only when needed. The galaxy would be free to develop how ever they wanted. But if say Asari suddenly wanted to be supreme rulers of the galaxy. He would step in to defend the rest of the galaxy from them.


  • teh DRUMPf!! aime ceci

#518
teh DRUMPf!!

teh DRUMPf!!
  • Members
  • 9 142 messages

 Can I note the irony of the same people who reject the Catalyst's stance and see it as (it is not actually) wrongfully villifying synthetics largely also being scared ****less of Control ending, convinced that those synthetics are necessarily going to be malicious?


  • Tyrannosaurus Rex et gothpunkboy89 aiment ceci

#519
Monica21

Monica21
  • Members
  • 5 603 messages

Your statement made it seem that way. Asking who would he kill.


Perhaps you should focus on what was said rather than on what you think was said.
 

Because the result of that would be death. When humans demand Batarians stop and they don't the only way to prevent it would be war. Which would result in even more death for both sides.  Rather then millions die in an interstellar war. Shep AI can end it with minimal death needed.


Sure it would be. And? Humans can learn to place better defenses. Humans can stop colonizing in no-man's-land. The only way to evolve is to learn, and you can't learn without making mistakes.
 

Conquest that results in the death of thousands to millions to billions to trillions depending on how large it is. Are you actually saying that if I take a gun into a Wal Mart and kill everyone  in it. I should be entitled to all the goods in the store? I certainly would be conquest of that store.  How about we go smaller I go to my next door neighbors house and kill him. Am I now entitled to everything he owned including spouse and children?


You can't be this naive. Unless you are. If you walk into a Wal-Mart and kill everyone you're committing the crime of first degree murder. If you take an army into Afghanistan you're not committing any crime. You're not violating treaties and you're not violating any UN proclamations. You can question the ethics of marching an army into Afghanistan, but that's about it. In the Mass Effect universe this is a problem if it's Council space. If it's not, then you have problems. Point being that there are already laws in place.
 

As with above Shep would fight the battle for everyone so only the aggressors need to die.


And what if the aggressors aren't the ones at fault? And how do you determine who's at fault?
 

No what I'm saying what I've always been saying is Shep would act like the police force of the galaxy. Stepping in to defend or attack only when needed. The galaxy would be free to develop how ever they wanted. But if say Asari suddenly wanted to be supreme rulers of the galaxy. He would step in to defend the rest of the galaxy from them.


And that's exactly what I don't want. An all-seeing, one-man galactic police force that can operate with no consequences is an inherently bad idea.

#520
Timberley

Timberley
  • Members
  • 224 messages

They exist because The Shepard allows it, and will end because The Shepard demands it

Which is why my Shep chose Control.  She sees politicians and the Council as self-serving idiots, who have no real concern over the common citizen.  She exists as Reaper!Shep to protect the common man from the machinations of those who would cause harm and tragedy to them.  And if those who seek to do harm don't get the hint from a single controlled Reaper in contested space... Well, she has many more with which to ensure that the survivors will not try again.  

 

To go with Monica21's other analogy of the comm buoy; the cost is dependent on what you mean.  If you don't know you're being listened to, what cost is there to you?  Further, why would Reaper!Shep even care that you're planning to throw your mum a surprise birthday party?  If you're planning on causing mass murder, then Reaper!Shep can alert the authorities, depending on how she (in my case it's a she) wants to handle it.  

 

In many ways Reaper!Shep is the Benevolent Dictator.  The alien species that have reached the necessary technological point to begin a Reaper cycle now have the opportunity to progress even further than they ever could, in concert with the vast historical knowledge and capabilities of the Reapers.

 

Tim



#521
Monica21

Monica21
  • Members
  • 5 603 messages

i-give-up.gif


  • Natureguy85 aime ceci

#522
gothpunkboy89

gothpunkboy89
  • Members
  • 1 270 messages

Perhaps you should focus on what was said rather than on what you think was said.
 

Sure it would be. And? Humans can learn to place better defenses. Humans can stop colonizing in no-man's-land. The only way to evolve is to learn, and you can't learn without making mistakes.
 

You can't be this naive. Unless you are. If you walk into a Wal-Mart and kill everyone you're committing the crime of first degree murder. If you take an army into Afghanistan you're not committing any crime. You're not violating treaties and you're not violating any UN proclamations. You can question the ethics of marching an army into Afghanistan, but that's about it. In the Mass Effect universe this is a problem if it's Council space. If it's not, then you have problems. Point being that there are already laws in place.
 

And what if the aggressors aren't the ones at fault? And how do you determine who's at fault?
 

And that's exactly what I don't want. An all-seeing, one-man galactic police force that can operate with no consequences is an inherently bad idea.

 

No this is what you said.

 

So what should they conolize? How does something go from no man's land into safe zone?

 

Isn't the Krogan killing millions of people to gain the benefits of conquest first degree murder as well? When all AI Shep would do is prevent them from doing so. With force if necessary.

 

What depends on which Shep is in control. Paragon Shep would just interced to prevent a war and let the citizens of the galaxy punish those that are truly responsible. Renegade Shep would stop the war then personally hunt down those responsible for attempting to start the war and end them.  Which again isn't much different then what happens now.

 

Oh how is it a bad idea?  Isn't the Specters a galactic police force that can operate with no consequences to their actions? In fact the only reason Shep can do what Shep does to even bring about this set up is because he/she is a Specter. Part of a galactic police force that can operate with no consequences.

 

So what you claim is bad is also the only reason why the Reapers didn't just harvest this cycle without an issue.



#523
Monica21

Monica21
  • Members
  • 5 603 messages

No this is what you said.


It's not. I said that even Paragon Shepard said he would was prepared to destroy if need be. "If need be" does not equal "right away."
 

So what should they conolize? How does something go from no man's land into safe zone?


I don't know. It was your scenario, so you figure it out.
 

Isn't the Krogan killing millions of people to gain the benefits of conquest first degree murder as well? When all AI Shep would do is prevent them from doing so. With force if necessary.


I don't think you understand. First Degree Murder is a modern legal definition of killing someone with malice and premeditation. We have no idea if other space-faring creatures have this same concept of the law as we do. So no, you can't just slap down something from state or federal law and declare that it's the same thing everywhere.
 

What depends on which Shep is in control. Paragon Shep would just interced to prevent a war and let the citizens of the galaxy punish those that are truly responsible. Renegade Shep would stop the war then personally hunt down those responsible for attempting to start the war and end them.  Which again isn't much different then what happens now.


And that statement is nothing but speculation.
 

Oh how is it a bad idea?  Isn't the Specters a galactic police force that can operate with no consequences to their actions?


No, it's not. First, if it hadn't been for you finding Tali then Saren would still have the authority of the Spectres while he worked to let the Reapers take over the galaxy. But, they still do have consequences. Saren got kicked out of the Spectres, so there most certainly are consequences for failing to carry out a duty.

#524
gothpunkboy89

gothpunkboy89
  • Members
  • 1 270 messages

It's not. I said that even Paragon Shepard said he would was prepared to destroy if need be. "If need be" does not equal "right away."
 

I don't know. It was your scenario, so you figure it out.
 

I don't think you understand. First Degree Murder is a modern legal definition of killing someone with malice and premeditation. We have no idea if other space-faring creatures have this same concept of the law as we do. So no, you can't just slap down something from state or federal law and declare that it's the same thing everywhere.
 

And that statement is nothing but speculation.
 

No, it's not. First, if it hadn't been for you finding Tali then Saren would still have the authority of the Spectres while he worked to let the Reapers take over the galaxy. But, they still do have consequences. Saren got kicked out of the Spectres, so there most certainly are consequences for failing to carry out a duty.

 

 

Yes destory the fleet of ships that are attacking a colony because a War Lord wants the supplies they have. Destroy the Asari Military bases because they decided they want to be supreme rulers of the galaxy with every other species as their slave.  As necessary is the key word. You can not protect without some times destroying things.

 

Wait wait wait. I state as an example. Batarians making slave raids as in game we already know they do.  AI Shep stepping in to tell them to knock it off. Saving thousands of lives from a War that would be needed to make them stop that action normally. You then say that

 


 

 

Sure it would be. And? Humans can learn to place better defenses. Humans can stop colonizing in no-man's-land. The only way to evolve is to learn, and you can't learn without making mistakes.

 

 

I ask you how does an area go from no man's land to safe area for them to colonize. Thus remove the threat of Batarian Slave raid and your responds is I don't know.  You have no idea how much my sides hurt from laughing at that responds.

 

Death is death. Murder is Murder. If Krogan want to kill each other that is fine. If Krogan want to kill Turians that is a problem. You seem to be advocating if one species sees killing as ok. They should be allowed to kill anyone and in any number they feel justified in killing. Because it lines up with their social structure. Even if the people involved in being killed are not from the same group and have the same feeling.

 

Every statement of your statements is speculation.

 

Your example of Saren is hilarious. The only reason he got any consequences to his actions is because he went against the Council. As long as the Specters didn't go against he Council they were able to do what ever they felt was necessary to achieve the goal of peace.  Espionage, sabotage or out right assassination. No matter what they did as long as the council approved they were untouchable by the galaxy at large.


Replay the trillogy again watch how many times Shep invokes his Specter status. Gaining access to things normal police forces wouldn't be able to gain access.  Renegade on ME1 the Alliance banks on the face you are an untouchable Specter when you are sent to "negotiate" with a red sand dealer. When you kill him  they mention that normally you would be punished but since you are a Specter they can't do anything about it.



#525
Monica21

Monica21
  • Members
  • 5 603 messages

Wait wait wait. I state as an example. Batarians making slave raids as in game we already know they do.  AI Shep stepping in to tell them to knock it off. Saving thousands of lives from a War that would be needed to make them stop that action normally. You then say that


That sounds nice in theory. How do you know that Control Shepard won't just kill all the Batarians to make sure an attempted raid on a colony never happens again? Control Shepard is not an angry parent or a Benevolent Dictator. Control Shepard is as close to a god as we can describe.
 

I ask you how does an area go from no man's land to safe area for them to colonize. Thus remove the threat of Batarian Slave raid and your responds is I don't know.  You have no idea how much my sides hurt from laughing at that responds.


Again, it's your scenario. Your solution to your scenario is that good, kind Shepard steps in and frowns. You can laugh all you want, but if you can't think of a solution to your own problem that isn't a literal deus ex machina then it remains your problem.
 

Death is death.

Yes it is.
 

Murder is Murder.

No it's not. Murder is a legal definition. You can't blindly assume that everyone has the same definition of murder, or even a definition of murder, that a modern, Earth society does.

 

If Krogan want to kill each other that is fine.


Why?
 

If Krogan want to kill Turians that is a problem.


How is this different from Krogan killing Krogan? I thought you said that murder was murder.
 

You seem to be advocating if one species sees killing as ok. They should be allowed to kill anyone and in any number they feel justified in killing. Because it lines up with their social structure. Even if the people involved in being killed are not from the same group and have the same feeling.


I'm not an advocate of anything. I'm telling what the current, Earth-bound, rules of warfare are as I understand them. I am in no way an advocate of war or killing.
 

Every statement of your statements is speculation.


Eh.
 

Your example of Saren is hilarious. The only reason he got any consequences to his actions is because he went against the Council.


He had consequences, which is the point. You claimed that the Spectres don't have consequences when the first hour of the games tells you that they clearly do.
 

Replay the trillogy again watch how many times Shep invokes his Specter status. Gaining access to things normal police forces wouldn't be able to gain access.  Renegade on ME1 the Alliance banks on the face you are an untouchable Specter when you are sent to "negotiate" with a red sand dealer. When you kill him  they mention that normally you would be punished but since you are a Specter they can't do anything about it.


Sure, and if I'm a cop I can gain access to a lot of things a normal citizen couldn't gain access to. I can kick down a door with a no-knock warrant and point my gun in someone's face. Your example of what Spectres can and can't do is just an extension of what any other law enforcement organization already has.

Do better.