Sure, I'd love that, and they could do it, as they did with the Orlesian Warden in Awakening. But they've said in the past that they didn't like the way that turned out, so I guess that's a nope.
Too bad, though, because I'd love the chance to play a character who wasn't always on the side of good, and that goes beyond just having a bad attitude. The only game I can think of that allowed this ending was Obsidian's NWN2, but, even then, it was game over, as I don't think you could play the expansions with a character who sided with the King of Shadows.
I don't like to measure it in terms of 'good'. I mean, the heroic fiction nowadays often puts such a narrow definition on 'good' right? 'Good' means 'defender of the status quo'. X-men, superman, spiderman, whoever, they usually just declare 'the world is beautiful and I'm going to defend it'. Depending on how cynical you are regarding the modern world, it could be a defensible goal. But Thedas? It is a downright shithole compared to the fantasy realms of most other games and novels. The nations are all flawed, there is corruption everywhere, humanity has been mired in chaos and devastation without any technological or moral advancement. Saving the world from another blight just buys the Orlesians time to host a few more parties, and the Fereldens to get drunk for another decade. On the other hand, I consider Lavellan to be more of her own elven people than the inquisition, especially considering that by Trespasser even having been the Herald of Andraste and killed Corypheus, she still isn't universally accepted by Thedas as a hero. I don't see anything 'evil' with helping her own people and choosing their own path. The people of Thedas have already been saved by the Herald of Andraste. But stepping down and becoming Lavellan again, I'd say she's earned her right to do damn well whatever she pleases, including restoring the People.





Retour en haut





