79 réponses à ce sujet

[PnXMarcin1PL]

Inquisitor is incapacitated in terms of combat. He or she has got one arm. I think we will either be new hero or return to being the hero of ferelden

[Emerald Rift]

There are plenty of reasons to continue as the Inquisitor and also plenty to not continue. The idea of two protagonists could work but it would be complicated. I wouldn't mind either way...unless DA4 might have nothing to do with Solas at all. The next game might just focus on the qunari and maybe Tevinter going through a change of politics and rebellion especially with Dorian being a member of the Magisterium. The new protagonist might have no idea about the bigger threat until the Inquisitor appears if they appear at all.

[Snowy-Ninja]

Well look on the bright side if we do have to remake them (if they reappear) we might have the option to have better hair. Imagine... an Inquisitor with long hair! (without needing mods)

[Fearsome1]

Something came to me, It seems Bioware is planning to keep the Inquisitor around for sometime and the chances of them appearing in Dragon Age 4 are high. 

But the issue i'm seeing is the looks of the inquisitor. With there being no way to save the construction of our Inquisitors face, will we have to rebuild them from scratch like Hawke or will Bioware come up with a solution to this problem.

What is everyone's thoughts on this?

 

Having dropped support of the previous platforms, and even with the existence of the Dragon Age Keep for world state imports, I don't see why we wouldn't be able to import a previous Inquisitor from an active server file for DA4? Now,if that seems unlikely given these elements, then it seems to suggest that the Inquisitor may NOT physically appear next time and will only send communiques or war table aid.

[Mr.House]

Leaving the Inquisitor behind is the best option.

Explain to me how leaving a character behind who

 

1:Is always alive

2:Was able to tell Solas what they will do with him

3: The ending of Trespasser

 

is the best option.

[Jandi]

Explain to me how leaving a character behind who

 

1:Is always alive

2:Was able to tell Solas what they will do with him

3: The ending of Trespasser

 

is the best option.

 

Let's be real here. Dying in Dragon Age series is a very relative term. Characters being alive or dead means very little when it comes to wether or not they will appear later.

[Mr.House]

 

Let's be real here. Dying in Dragon Age series is a very relative term. Characters being alive or dead means very little when it comes to wether or not they will appear later.

Very few characters have died and come back, and except for Oghren (who was a **** character anyways, so no surprise he also had a **** retcon) it was always because of a spirit. There are also plenty of characters who have stayed dead.

[Al Foley]

I imagine that if the Inquisitor reappears we'll be rebuilding them in the character creator.

(Disgusted noise)

[Nefla]

I always recreated my Shepards with each ME game so that they'd be graphically better and tweak a few things so a new CC wouldn't bother me if the inquisitor is the protagonist again. If they're not, then I don't want to play DA4 anyway unless the story has nothing to do with Solas and any of the events of DA:I and Trespasser I guess.

[Fredward]

Why would DA now all of a sudden backtrack on its new-MC approach is what I'm wondering.

[Mr.House]

Why would DA now all of a sudden backtrack on its new-MC approach is what I'm wondering.

Because DAI was not a failure, the new-MC approach only became a thing after DA2 was a failure to the point it's own expac was cancelled.

[jlb524]

I sure don't want the Inquisitor back as protag. If the next game is in Tevinter, I'd rather play as a native to that country (with backgrounds varying by race/class.

The Inquisitor showing up in a Tevinter defeats the whole purpose of going to Tevinter to find people not attached to the Inquisition in the first place. That would just draw suspicion.

[Smudjygirl]

Because DAI was not a failure, the new-MC approach only became a thing after DA2 was a failure to the point it's own expac was cancelled.

 

Hawke also never felt involved in their own story. They always just seemed to be a really unlucky pup. Certain story points that are apparently going to be apart of the "potential" DA4 are intertwined with the Inquisitors story. To bring a new PC just for the sake of having a new PC seems pointless to me.

[Nefla]

*snip*

Guts can do it.

So could Fenris in DA2, swinging around those surfboard swords one-handed like they were toothpicks

 

Inquisitor is incapacitated in terms of combat. He or she has got one arm. I think we will either be new hero or return to being the hero of ferelden

Unless the inquisitor was an archer, I don't see why they would be "incapacitated in terms of combat" though in one of the epilogue slides the inquisitor had a mini crossbow replacing their hand so even an archer could make it work

Spoiler

[Fredward]

Because DAI was not a failure, the new-MC approach only became a thing after DA2 was a failure to the point it's own expac was cancelled.

 

Mmkay. If they didn't decide to go with the Warden cuz they could die and was unvoiced and they skipped Hawke because s/he was a 'failure' I guess I could see why they might decide to suddenly make... actually no, I can't.

 

Guess we'll see in 2-4 years.

[Dancing_Dolphin]

Inquisitor is incapacitated in terms of combat.

Imagine how inspiring it would be if you were wrong.

[BloodyTalon]

Ir's more likely a friend like Hardling will be scouting north, or Dorian will be there to find that someone Solas doesn't know.

At beat we will get a letter, but doubt the Inquestior will show up fully, though if they did we probably get something like we did for Hawke, four year s and such most likely another gen of consoles by then or they could add something to the keep.

[dreamgazer]

Unless the inquisitor was an archer, I don't see why they would be "incapacitated in terms of combat"

#NoExcuses

[PIT_DEFENDER]

Whatever theyll diecide is not going to be like me2>me3 trasition, these days are over. Now they charage huge, focus on DRM and dont deliver. Bioware a divions of Exrteme Assholes.

[AllThatJazz]

Inquisitor is incapacitated in terms of combat. He or she has got one arm. 

 

Yes, because Luke Skywalker was completely useless after his hand was cut off, and was replaced in RoTJ by one of the Ewoks.

[Mr.House]

Imagine how inspiring it would be if you were wrong.

Ash, Anakin, Luke, Jensen, Guts, Shirou, Shepard (by ME2 she is pretty much a cyborg at this point) ect

 

The list goes on with protags/characters that despite losing a hand/arm/limbs  where just as strong or even stronger in terms of writing or combat)

[PIT_DEFENDER]

 

Yes, because Luke Skywalker was completely useless after his hand was cut off, and was replaced in RoTJ by one of the Ewoks.
 

He was completely useless before, which is why no1 realised it was an Ewok not the actual guy in ROTJ.

 

 

 

And yeah some1 said it doesnt matter if someone dies or not in BW games cause he will be likely replaced by a similar double, then on the other hand it doesnt awlays work out, like say Rachni who were xtint and then returned in me1 and then u kill the queen but reapers found another one( or got one in Tesco since you can get a rachni queen everwhere right ?) and rachni returned yet again in me 3. that was big failure on their side xD

[Hanako Ikezawa]

Why would DA now all of a sudden backtrack on its new-MC approach is what I'm wondering.

They almost backtracked it for Inquisition. Hawke was originally planned to become the Inquisitor, but like Mr.House said after the bad reception to DA2 they decided to create a new protagonist, originally being human-only with a few backgrounds and then due to the time extension multiple races. 

[PIT_DEFENDER]

It would be very boring if Hawke would become inquisitor, What i like about DA series is the different stories come with every race and class.

[Teddie Sage]

I think they're going to reuse the Frostbite engine with some tweaks in it, like new hairstyles, etc.