Aller au contenu

Photo

trespasser endings suck


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
29 réponses à ce sujet

#26
BansheeOwnage

BansheeOwnage
  • Members
  • 11 198 messages

Actually the fate of the Inquisition is pretty realistic. The Inquisition came into being during a crisis and was welcomed by the existing powers who were struggling to deal with the problem, but once the existing powers reordered themselves, they were keen to dispose of this new upstart power in their midst. No power likes a rival, and both Orlais and Ferelden would reasonably view the Inquisition as an unpredictable element that they would rather either control or eliminate, to the extent that they might even work together to neutralise the interloper, which is pretty much what happened with the Exalted Council.

I wish we actually got to take part in the Exalted Council. I was looking forward to that clear-your-name, non-combat sort of fight, especially after they skipped Shepard's trial in ME3. There was a crazy amount of build-up for the council only to get one scene where you talk about a keep, then the end scene.

 

It would have been a lot better if you had to go through more of it between eluvian expeditions, and would have made you feel even more pressure as the Inquisitor, which would have been masochistically awesome.


  • Jeffonl1, Ryzaki, Darkstarr11 et 1 autre aiment ceci

#27
Uirebhiril

Uirebhiril
  • Members
  • 2 524 messages

I wish we actually got to take part in the Exalted Council. I was looking forward to that clear-your-name, non-combat sort of fight, especially after they skipped Shepard's trial in ME3. There was a crazy amount of build-up for the council only to get one scene where you talk about a keep, then the end scene.

 

It would have been a lot better if you had to go through more of it between eluvian expeditions, and would have made you feel even more pressure as the Inquisitor, which would have been masochistically awesome.

 

I'm going to agree with this. I would have liked to see more of a battle of wits and words with the council between rushing around after qunari and Solas, and whatever choices, decisions, and influence or help we had or offered would have come into play. Kind of like at the Landsmeet. Just seems like a lot of missed potential even with as good as the DLC was otherwise.


  • BansheeOwnage aime ceci

#28
ArianaGBSA

ArianaGBSA
  • Members
  • 275 messages

I don't understand where you're going with this argument. Are you saying the Inquisition should just outright conquer Orlais and Ferelden? I don't get the realism point.

"I only hate losing a limb, I couldn't care less for the Inquisition, I hated it from the start, it is stupid and should never have existed"
I think it is pretty clear.



#29
Big I

Big I
  • Members
  • 2 882 messages

I understand why they did it. Unless they wanted to make the Inquisition the most improtant institution in Thedas, with any future protagonists being a part of it, they had to decrease it's power. I'm still disappointed.

 

It always annoyed me in the main game when people would act as though the Inquisition should disband after Corypheus, as though there was nothing more to do. Ah, excuse me? Figuring out who the Executors and Those Across the Sea are, fighting darkspawn, aiding rebuilding efforts from the various wars; there is plenty of stuff to do. I chose not to disband the Inquisition, and I hope it does more in the future than just guard Chantries


  • Jeffonl1 et BansheeOwnage aiment ceci

#30
Dai Grepher

Dai Grepher
  • Members
  • 4 661 messages

When I heard about the new DLC I decided it was time to finally finish DAI. so first character I finished was my human mage, sided with the mages, thought mages should be free, but also was a non believer and thought the chantry didnt deserve to be saved nor the seekers. Yeah, a lot of the mages you meet while playing are all like "the circle saved me, I was poor or I was attacked, blah blah blah" but I took my human noble background to heart, the circle kept me from my title, screw them.

 

so then why are the only 2 options for what becomes of my inquisition disband or become the churches guard. where was the "**** you, **** you, **** you, I'm out" option where you blow off the council, give the finger to the chantry and do whatever you want.

 

and after my mage I was really looking forward to playing a power hungry rogue that sees the inquisition as a chance to seize control during the chaos.

 

if a warden of noble birth can save the world from a blight and still become king of ferelden, then my inquisitor should be able to have a better choice than pope patrol or secret solas hunters.

 

I don't disagree with most of what you're posting, but remember, the human noble actually has a legitimate claim to the throne, and he and Anora are elected by the banns. That's why he can become king and she queen. The Inquisition was only restored because of the Divine's directive. Granted, the Inquisition was an independent organization before the Chantry was founded, but it did make the pledge to join, and it had been that way ever since. So there is actually more precedent for the Inquisition abiding Chantry dicta.

 

Having lost the mark, your ability to fight and help the world is drastically reduced. So if the other nations banded against you, it probably wouldn't end well.

 

But I do agree that there should have been a way to keep the Inquisition independent and set it toward reasonable goals. The choice between being absorbed back into the Chantry or disbanding is no choice at all. Disbanding means the Inquisition soldiers probably go to the Chantry anyway, and all the wealth too, or else the nations would fight over it. So it's basically the same result either way.